--- Comment #141 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #138)
(In reply to Warren Togami from comment #137)
> 1) "bitcoin-core" is not a good main package name because it looks like
> "core" is a subpackage. "bitcoincore" would be a fine single
word name that
> matches its website
bitcoincore.org.
It won't look like a subpackage because it's just SRPM package name, but
none of RPM packages built from it will be called "bitcoin-core".
However, from aesthetic point of view, I think, it would be nicer is RPM
packages would be called "bitcoin-server", "bitcoin-utils" etc.
instead of
"bitcoin-core-server", "bitcoin-core-utils" etc.
This was discussed before, it was the case when I started the review (as it
would be my preference as well) and I was asked to change it as the package
should not represent bitcoin as a whole but one of the different
implementations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.