https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #13 from Georg Sauthoff <fedora(a)georg.so> ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10)
Well, the authors try to get compatible with GPL. Maybe ask upstream
to
upgrade.
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5
FWIW, the EPL 2.0 FAQ lists 4 'major' changes. The _optional_ GPL2+
compatibility (through specifying the GPL as a secondary license) is just one
of them:
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.a0eux401qus
Thus, the EPL 2.0 (without the secondary license option) is as GPL compatible
as EPL 1.0, i.e. it isn't GPL compatible.
cf. e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License#Version_2.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component