https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #21 from Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Antonio Murdaca from comment #16)
I've created
https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs where I do
have .spec(s)
and SRPM(s)
I'm planning to remove the .spec from the source repo and maintain the .spec
at
https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/tree/master/skopeo/fedora/skopeo
FWIW, Fedora's packaging repository will keep its own copy in a branch for each
Fedora release (see repositories at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/
for examples).
This license stuff is tricky...I've re-licensed my tool with ASL
2.0 since
all my vendors are ASL 2.0 afaict.
Yeah, that should be accurate either way.
I've added the removal of vendor/ when %{with_bundled} is 0
Right now, unluckily, this tool won't build from debundled vendor's copies,
and
also not all vendors are already in Fedora - but I'm working on packaging
them
with Lokesh and Jan for a future version
Understood, it's a work in progress.
should I call `make clean` to remove generated files in a %clean
section?
Historically, %clean's job was to clean up $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, way back when even
using a buildroot was optional. Now that the buildroot is set and cleaned up
by default, Fedora doesn't expect you to have a %clean section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component