[Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 00:07 EST ------- Hmm, this builds but will not install on current rawhide: Error: Missing Dependency: readline = 5.0 is needed by package libreadline-java Rawhide has readline 5.1; I changed readline_ver to match and it seems to be OK. Also, there are a few rpmlint warnings; I think it now checks for more than it did when I first looked at this package. W: libreadline-java macro-in-%changelog _jnidir W: libreadline-java macro-in-%changelog _libdir You need to double any percent symbols that appear in the changelog, lest they be expanded in the final RPM. E: libreadline-java no-cleaning-of-buildroot You need rpm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install. W: libreadline-java mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs It's complaining about a couple of tabs after Group: (use "less -U" to see them). This isn't a blocker. The debuginfo package is now missing the source again. I'm at a loss as to why this is continually a problem, but it's not really a blocker. Perhaps some day someone will actually understand what's going on here. You need to include COPYING.LIB as %doc. Shouldn't the jar file go in /usr/share/java? If not, nothing in your dependency chain owns /usr/lib/java. * source files match upstream: 501720ddded45eaedf429b7cc356107c libreadline-java-0.8.0-src.tar.gz X package meets naming and packaging guidelines (non-numeric release bits). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text upstream but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). ? debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints X final provides and requires are sane: libreadline-java = 0.8.0-10jpp_3fc = X readline = 5.0 /sbin/ldconfig java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 /bin/sh * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * a shared library is present and ldconfig is called properly. * package is not relocatable. ? owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig, gcj-db) * code, not content. * javadocs split out into separate jackage. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * unversioned .so in -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.