https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #56 from Erik Schilling <ablu.erikschilling(a)googlemail.com> ---
The point of the warning is to catch stuff that installs only
architecture-
independent stuff into %{_libdir}, which would be better put into %{_datadir}
or %{_libexecdir}. But this is not the case here, the warning is a false
positive (and since it's an obvious case, it should be reported as a bug to
rpmlint, really).
Thanks a lot for the explanation. Tagged the mail as todo so I do
not forget
reporting the issue against rpmlint.
Copy&paste error there.
Thanks a lot. Fixed locally.
Waiting for more severe issues for kicking off
builds.
I really think the packaging of qbs in Fedora is over complicated.
I am sorry to hear that. I was still open to take input on this subpackage
splitups. But after I pointed out my points I did not receive any input on it
so I sticked on it.
As you can see this new release already adds two new modules... If I would put
everything into the same package I fear that it would be pretty annoying later
on and splitting it later again would be a lot more complex (How could I even
split out a module later? One person might need it so to prevent confusion
during the update I would need to add a Requires: to it. But another person
might have never used it and would end up installing the subpackage he does not
need).
But still thanks a lot for all the input so far!
Regards,
Erik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component