--- Comment #47 from Keyue Hu <hukeyue(a)hotmail.com> ---
First issue, fixed by unitfy all LICENSES files into one and guard it with
'%license' field
Second issue, fixed by regenerating srpm from source tarball at public site
instead of from local source files.
Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file LICENSE.abseil-cpp is not marked as %license
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
/home/fedora/2231252-yass/diff.txt
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.