https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848
--- Comment #20 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to dan.cermak from comment #19)
Thanks for the extensive review, I have tried to address most of the
issues
and pushed the new version to pagure
(
https://pagure.io/Bear_rpm/blob/master/f/bear.spec) and copr
(
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/defolos/devel/).
However, concerning this:
> - Use a more meaningful name for your package:
I'd prefer not to change the package's name, as it is widely known as bear
(it is recommended frequently when working with clang-tooling) and most
other distribution package it under its upstream name.
I'm only talking about the archive name, instead of %{version}.tar.gz use
%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz. It it less ambiguous.
- Use a more meaningful name for your archive:
Source: %{URL}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component