[Bug 812674] New: Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
3:50 p.m.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking
command-line tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Summary: Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends
to various networking command-line tools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kalevlember(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gnome-nettool.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gnome-nettool-3.2.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
GNOME Nettool is a set of front-ends to various networking command-line
tools, like ping, netstat, ifconfig, whois, traceroute, finger.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 14:32:45 EDT ---
I'll take this one.
Quick spec review:
1. %global is preferred over %define[1].
2. I've never seen desktop-file-validate put in %check. I think that's usually
for "make test" type unit testing to kill builds that fail their tests even if
they build. I usually put it in %install.
Otherwise looks good. Now off the building...
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_ov...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 14:52:34 EDT ---
Ok, I couldn't build for rawhide. It seemed to bomb out during building the
language files:
xsltproc -o gnome-nettool-ru.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename gnome-nettool
--stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd
"-//OASIS//DTD
DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" --stringparam db2omf.lang ru --stringparam
db2omf.omf_dir "/usr/share/omf" --stringparam db2omf.help_dir
"/usr/share/gnome/help" --stringparam db2omf.omf_in
"/builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/help/gnome-nettool.omf.in"
`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` ru/gnome-nettool.xml ||
{ rm -f "gnome-nettool-ru.omf"; exit 1; }
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/dbpoolx.mod:3408: parser warning :
PEReference: %tbl.table.att; not found
%tbl.table.att;
^
which I guess is just a warning, but then it gets a whole bunch of these:
xsltproc -o gnome-nettool-zh_CN.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename gnome-nettool
--stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd
"-//OASIS//DTD
DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" --stringparam db2omf.lang zh_CN --stringparam
db2omf.omf_dir "/usr/share/omf" --stringparam db2omf.help_dir
"/usr/share/gnome/help" --stringparam db2omf.omf_in
"/builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/help/gnome-nettool.omf.in"
`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` zh_CN/gnome-nettool.xml
|| { rm -f "gnome-nettool-zh_CN.omf"; exit 1; }
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/ent/iso-lat1.ent:1: parser error :
Content error in the external subset
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
^
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/ent/iso-lat1.ent:1: validity error
: All markup of the conditional section is not in the same entity
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:28 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 15:28:40 EDT
---
In your build, the XML validation step with xsltproc is failing for some
reason. It is accessing the network to download the DTD files and is getting
errors with the downloaded files.
My local build completes without warnings, but I suspect it's because I have
docbook-style-xsl installed. In any case, it's not a problem with this package;
I guess gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets should get a dep on docbook-style-xsl for
local validation.
I did koji scratch builds for f17 and rawhide and xsltproc is only complaining
about the lack of network access there and the builds are successful:
"ru/gnome-nettool.xml:8: warning: failed to load external entity /.../"
f17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4002389
rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4002392
I'll look into fixing gnome-doc-utils to add the missing dep, but this
shouldn't block this package as the builds are fine in koji.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:23 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 16:23:53 EDT
---
Fixed the missing dep in gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10-2.fc17:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gnome-doc-utils.git;a=commitdiff;...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:28 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 16:28:38 EDT ---
Ok, no showstopper there. Can you comment on comment 1? (that sounds redundant
:)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:46 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 16:46:38 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
I'll take this one.
Quick spec review:
1. %global is preferred over %define[1].
Fixed.
2. I've never seen desktop-file-validate put in %check. I think
that's usually
for "make test" type unit testing to kill builds that fail their tests even if
they build. I usually put it in %install.
There's a section in the packaging guidelines which explicitly says that it's
fine to place it in either %check or %install. In any case, we want the build
to fail if the validation fails, what's the whole point of using
desktop-file-validate.
"one MUST run /.../ desktop-file-validate (in %check or %install)"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_u...
* Wed Apr 18 2012 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 3.2.0-2
- Use %%global instead of %%define (#812674)
Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gnome-nettool.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gnome-nettool-3.2.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
Scratch build for rawhide with new gnome-doc-utils in buildroot:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4003063
gnome-doc-utils update if you want to try and give karma:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10-2.fc17
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:51 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 16:51:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> 2. I've never seen desktop-file-validate put in %check. I
think that's usually
> for "make test" type unit testing to kill builds that fail their tests
even if
> they build. I usually put it in %install.
There's a section in the packaging guidelines which explicitly says that it's
fine to place it in either %check or %install. In any case, we want the build
to fail if the validation fails, what's the whole point of using
desktop-file-validate.
"one MUST run /.../ desktop-file-validate (in %check or %install)"
Hmmm... never noticed that before!
Scratch build for rawhide with new gnome-doc-utils in buildroot:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4003063
gnome-doc-utils update if you want to try and give karma:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10-2.fc17
I'll try it in an F17 mock build (since I was using rawhide).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 16:52:08 EDT ---
Never mind :) The SRPM was fc17, the build was 18.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:11 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 17:11:08 EDT ---
Ok, a couple of problems:
3. Have you reported the bad FSF addresses upstream?
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/info.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/info.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/util-mii.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/main.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/traceroute.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/utils.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/scan.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/lookup.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/finger.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/netstat.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/finger.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/lookup.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/netstat.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/ping.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/whois.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/ping.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/callbacks.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/nettool.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/whois.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/nettool.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/gn-combo-history.h
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/traceroute.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/scan.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/gn-combo-history.c
gnome-nettool-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gnome-nettool-3.2.0/src/utils.c
4. I can't install the packages in a F17 chroot because the programs are in
/bin still, not /usr/bin... Perhaps you need an %if conditionals for the
requires for usrmove?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-18 17:24:54 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Ok, a couple of problems:
3. Have you reported the bad FSF addresses upstream?
No, I don't want to report such bugs without providing a patch and I don't have
the energy right now to do one for gnome-nettool.
4. I can't install the packages in a F17 chroot because the
programs are in
/bin still, not /usr/bin... Perhaps you need an %if conditionals for the
requires for usrmove?
You probably have an old mock cache or something. All these paths resolve fine:
$ repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/dig /usr/bin/netstat /usr/bin/nmap
/usr/bin/ping /usr/bin/ping6 /usr/bin/pinky /usr/bin/traceroute
/usr/bin/traceroute6 /usr/bin/whois
bind-utils-32:9.9.0-1.fc17.x86_64
bind-utils-32:9.9.0-1.fc17.x86_64
nmap-2:5.51-3.fc17.x86_64
iputils-0:20101006-14.fc17.x86_64
iputils-0:20101006-14.fc17.x86_64
coreutils-0:8.15-6.fc17.x86_64
jwhois-0:4.0-29.fc17.x86_64
whois-0:5.0.15-1.fc17.x86_64
whois-0:5.0.15-1.fc17.x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:19 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 10:19:53 EDT
---
Weird... I did a mock --scrub=all but still didn't work for me. I'm not going
to worry about holding up the review for it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:32 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 10:32:40 EDT
---
Ok, I have one minor optional nit-pick. It's kind of stupid but the freedesktop
spec indirectly requires at least a 48x48 icon file even if you have an SVG.
This package only provides up to a 32x32. You could ask upstream or use
imagemagick convert to create one of the SVG. I've done this on the fly in the
spec file for previous packages but then you have the extra BRs of ImageMagick.
+: OK
-: must be fixed
=: should be fixed (at your discretion)
?: Question or clairification needed
N: not applicable
MUST:
[+] rpmlint output: shown in comment.
[+] follows package naming guidelines
[+] spec file base name matches package name
[+] package meets the packaging guidelines
[+] package uses a Fedora approved license: GPLv2+
[+] license field matches the actual license.
[+] license file is included in %doc: COPYING
[+] spec file is in American English
[+] spec file is legible
[+] sources match upstream: md5sum matches (18b97581aee0d297d9ec5df60b550dc6)
[+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested F16/17 x86_64
[N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch
[+] all build requirements in BuildRequires
[+] spec file handles locales properly
[N] ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] no bundled copies of system libraries
[+] no relocatable packages
[+] package owns all directories that it creates
[+] no files listed twice in %files
[+] proper permissions on files
[+] consistent use of macros
[+] code or permissible content
[N] large documentation in -doc
[+] no runtime dependencies in %doc
[N] header files in -devel
[N] static libraries in -static
[N] .so in -devel
[N] -devel requires main package
[+] package contains no libtool archives
[+] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate
[+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
[+] all filenames in UTF-8
SHOULD:
[+] query upstream for license text
[N] description and summary contains available translations
[+] package builds in mock
[+] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64
[?] package functions as described: Not tested
[+] sane scriptlets
[N] subpackages require the main package
[N] placement of pkgconfig files
[+] file dependencies versus package dependencies
[N] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:44 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #13 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 12:44:23 EDT
---
Thanks Richard!
I'll talk to upstream about the icons, good catch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 12:45:49 EDT
---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gnome-nettool
Short Description: Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line
tools
Owners: kalev
Branches: f17
InitialCC:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:14 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 13:14:54 EDT ---
Unretired devel and f15, please take ownership in pkgdb, then file a Package
Change request for f16 and f17.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #16 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 13:34:52 EDT
---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: gnome-nettool
New Branches: f17
Owners: kalev
Thanks Jon. I'm not interested in the f15 and f16 branches, but took ownership
for devel and here's the change request to create the f17 branch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:53 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-19 13:53:06 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:17 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:17 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-04-20
01:17:41 EDT ---
gnome-nettool-3.2.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-nettool-3.2.0-2.fc17
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:50 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
--- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-20 12:50:45 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #9)
4. I can't install the packages in a F17 chroot because the
programs are in
/bin still, not /usr/bin... Perhaps you need an %if conditionals for the
requires for usrmove?
Turns out you were right here all along.
Apparently in addition to working with remote repos, repoquery also uses local
rpm database for depsolving, sometimes (!). And the local rpm database somehow
handles the /bin -> /usr/bin symlink, so that it can resolve symlinked
directories in already installed packages.
$ rpm -qf /bin/netstat
net-tools-1.60-134.20120127git.fc17.x86_64
$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/netstat
net-tools-1.60-134.20120127git.fc17.x86_64
Watch the inconsistency here, can't find provides for '/usr/bin/netstat' when
it's the only thing I'm quering:
$ repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/netstat
$ repoquery -q --whatprovides /bin/netstat
net-tools-0:1.60-134.20120127git.fc17.x86_64
... but works when '/usr/bin/dig' is also specified on the command line:
$ repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/dig /usr/bin/netstat
bind-utils-32:9.9.0-1.fc17.x86_64
bind-utils-32:9.9.0-1.fc17.x86_64
Fixed in
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gnome-nettool.git;a=commitdiff;h=...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:03 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-04-21
17:03:42 EDT ---
Package gnome-nettool-3.2.0-3.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gnome-nettool-3.2.0-3.fc17'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6322/gnome-nettool-3....
then log in and leave karma (feedback).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:44 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 812674] Review Request: gnome-nettool - Graphical front-ends to various networking command-line tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812674
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |gnome-nettool-3.2.0-3.fc17
Resolution| |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-05-02 00:44:20
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-02
00:44:20 EDT ---
gnome-nettool-3.2.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4398
days inactive
4415
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
23 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla