https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374982 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk(a)redhat.com&gt; --- This builds on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=799872 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374982 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Looks fine so APPROVED. Only a couple of things to note: * generally packages are named python2-XXX as opposed to python- * no python3 package. Presumably due to lack of support in deps such as koji (and also likely the reason for the python-XX above? * man page or more detailed README would be nice but that's RFE ;-) + rpmlint output pmlint -i download/python-robosignatory-0.0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + latest version packaged + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + Package perserves timestamps on install Permissions on files must be set properly + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package runtime n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream to include it n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a non -devel packages should require fully versioned base n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin - Package should have man files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component