https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 --- Comment #1 from Athmane Madjoudj <athmanem(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Note: this is my second package and I'm looking for sponsor. rpmlint output: greybird.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic greybird.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metacity -> meta city, meta-city, mendacity greybird.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grey -> Grey, gray, trey greybird.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ish -> is, sh, dish greybird.src: W: invalid-url Source0: shimmerproject-Greybird-v0.8.1-9-g10555c8.tar.gz greybird.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: shimmerproject-Greybird-v0.8.1-9-g10555c8.tar.gz 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4090481 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 Athmane Madjoudj <athmanem(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |greybird -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License GPLv2+ or CC-BY-SA OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Not a blocker, but might consider shipping the xfce-notify-4.0/ theme too? Also, lightdm is under review, so might be ready to ship it's theme? 2. If I use the method listed in the spec to get the source, I get: shimmerproject-Greybird-v0.8.2-0-g10555c8.tar.gz but you have shimmerproject-Greybird-v0.8.1-9-g10555c8.tar.gz (they appear identical, perhaps your versioning is off in the spec?) 3. rpmlint says: greybird.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist, minimalism, animistic greybird.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metacity -> meta city, meta-city, mendacity greybird.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grey -> Grey, gray, trey greybird.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ish -> is, sh, dish greybird.src: W: invalid-url Source0: shimmerproject-Greybird-v0.8.1-9-g10555c8.tar.gz 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. All can be ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; --- All those changes look good to me, I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. I'll go ahead and sponsor you into the packager group. :) Welcome to the fun. Continue the process from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Sou... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- greybird-0.8.2-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/greybird-0.8.2-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823311 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-06-06 22:34:10 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- greybird-0.8.2-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.