https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #48 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
* Modifying license file downstream
- Well, even if rpmlint complains somehow, I am strongly
against modifying license text downstream arbitrarily.
License text change must be done upstream.
Please pull the _actual_ upstream fix with the URL:
https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains-ng/commit/567935b1abb93af5616000814...
* Relation with "proxychains"
(In reply to Till Maas from comment #29)
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #28)
> Is proxychanins-ng going to replace proxychains? or is it installable in
> parallel? I must have missed that in my earlier comment.
sorry for the confusion. proxychains-ng is meant to replace proxychains i.e.
the current plan is to retire proxychains when this review is finished.
- Then please add some "Obsoletes" entry against proxychains.
* NOTE:
- Currently %_sysconfdir/proxychains.conf is also owned by
the "old" proxychains, so installing both proxychains and
proxychains-ng sees a conflict on %_sysconfdir/proxychains.conf .
Anyway, adding "Obsoletes" or "Conflicts" against proxychains
is currently needed (unless config file on proxychains-ng
is changed).
* Distro-specific configuration
Adjust ~/.proxychains/proxychains.conf for your Proxy and use
ProxyChains NG
with
proxychains4 application
- If this application cannot be used as it is and some
configuration
by user is needed, I think some explanation file like "README.fedora"
or so should be created, such explanation is not suitable for writing
in Summary or %description.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component