https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 --- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com&gt; --- New sources Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i1... SRPM URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i1... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |golang-github-nicksnyder-go |golang-github-nicksnyder-go |-i18n - Translate your Go |-i18n - Translate Go |program into multiple |programs into multiple |languages with templates |languages |and CLDR plural support | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Initial comments: 1) I think the peculiar definition of %gobuild (at line 18) is necessary for the successful generation of debuginfo packages, so that should be OK. Maybe add a comment why it's there? 2) Since the package provides a binary (goi18n), I think the main package name could be just named "goi18n" (see [1]) with subpackages "golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n-devel" and "golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n-unit-test-devel" (just like right now). But using the appropriate "Provides:" for the main package name (like you do now) should be fine too. 3) Please leave the %commit and %shortcommit definitions in the spec (just paste the commit hash of the used tag) - this is used by some of the automatic tooling for version tracking, for example like this: # version 1.7.0 == commit f757c9f9b69c16ff69d38dbf224be28a7b6537bb %global commit f757c9f9b69c16ff69d38dbf224be28a7b6537bb %global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7}) 4) What is the purpose of the %if-else block at line 45? There are no bundled sources present, so the BR on golang(gopkg.in/yaml.v2) should be there unconditionally. 5) Since the main package BRs: golang(gopkg.in/yaml.v2) anyway, you can remove it the -devel subpackage (line 61) along with the enclosing %if-endif block. 6) You can remove the empty %if-endif block at line 82-85. 7) Since there are no bundled sources (and both branches of the if-else are identical anyway), you can remove the wrapping around the GOPATH definition in line 106/109. 8) Why are you including a commented-out build / install / %files entry of the codegen binary? Maybe you could include a comment as to why you don't build this binary, but the disabled build alone is not really informative / helpful. [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go#Packaging_Binaries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Looks very good now! Package approved. PS: There's a typo in line 12 (s/loacles/locales) - just fix it before committing the .spec in git. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/go-i18n -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- go-i18n-1.7.0-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8dc79a021 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- go-i18n-1.7.0-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8dc79a021 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component