https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: No checksum, but diff of checkout matches unpacked tar.xz OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Would be good to include commands needed to checkout source if there's not a direct download link: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control A direct Source0 link would be nice if possible. 2. rpmlint says: fedup.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C the Fedora Upgrade tool Change the 'to' to 'To' ? fedup.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fedup-cli man page would be nice, but of course not required. fedup.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %files fedup.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir} fedup.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir} fedup.src: W: invalid-url Source0: fedup-0.7.tar.xz Remove % from those commented lines, or use %% None of those are blockers. If you could address them before import that would be great. Otherwise, this package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.