[Bug 1378895] New:
8-bpp TIFF images are broken in the resulting PDF document
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378895
Bug ID: 1378895
Summary: 8-bpp TIFF images are broken in the resulting PDF
document
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-PDF-API2
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bjohnson(a)symetrix.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1369984
External Bug ID: CPAN 118047
Created attachment 1204154
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1204154&action=edit
8-bpp TIFF image
This code creates an PDF with broken 8-bpp TIFF image:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use PDF::API2;
my $pdf = PDF::API2->new(-file => 'out.pdf');
my $page = $pdf->page;
$page->mediabox(157, 196);
my $imgobj = $pdf->image_tiff('8.tiff');
my $gfx = $page->gfx;
$gfx->image($imgobj, 0, 0, 157, 196);
$pdf->save;
$pdf->end;
It works fine if the TIFF image has only 1 bit per pixel. I have
perl-PDF-API2-2.025-1.fc23.noarch, but it it's broken in all Fedoras.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369984
[Bug 1369984] gscan2pdf v1.3.8 saves imported PDF pages as negative images
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1469031] New: Please update perl-Plack version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031
Bug ID: 1469031
Summary: Please update perl-Plack version
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Plack
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: clem.oudot(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,
jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, kwizart(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Hi,
for LemonLDAP::NG I need a more recent version of perl-Plack.
We currently have perl-Plack-1.0030-3.el7.noarch, and I would need at least
1.0033.
Thanks a lot for your help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1335443] New: Net::SSLeay produces a warning on EOF
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335443
Bug ID: 1335443
Summary: Net::SSLeay produces a warning on EOF
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: perl-Net-SSLeay
Severity: low
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: lav(a)yars.free.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Created attachment 1156525
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1156525&action=edit
proposed fix
Description of problem:
I repeatedly get this warning from Net::SSLeay:
Use of uninitialized value $got in string eq at blib/lib/Net/SSLeay.pm
(autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Net/SSLeay/ssl_read_all.al) line 549.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Net-SSLeay-1.68-1.fc22.x86_64
Expected results:
no warnings
Additional info:
a patch is attached.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1485309] New: [Request] Package upgrade
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485309
Bug ID: 1485309
Summary: [Request] Package upgrade
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Email-Simple
Severity: low
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: s.hamacher(a)science-computing.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
The package provides Email::Simple, currently in version 2.203 (from 2014). Is
it possible to get a more recent version? It is needed for a Foswiki
installation which requires at least version 2.206 of that module.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1473856] New: Conflict in perl-libs-4:5.24
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473856
Bug ID: 1473856
Summary: Conflict in perl-libs-4:5.24
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: perl
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: winter(a)kde.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
dnf update is showing a conflict between packages perl-libs i686 and x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387
How reproducible:
dnf update
Actual results:
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/man/man3/XSLoader.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/integer.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/re.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/strict.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/utf8.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/warnings.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
Expected results:
update should work
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1336403] New: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct stringification of
Mail::Internet; same as reference object'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336403
Bug ID: 1336403
Summary: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct
stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Abstract
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 fails to build in F25 because tests fail:
/00-report-prereqs.t .. ok
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# testing Email::Simple with 2.210
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Mail::Internet with 2.17
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# testing Mail::Message with 2.118
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 165.
t/abstractions.t .......
Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600)
Failed 6/165 subtests
This is caused by upgrading perl-MailTools from 2.16-1.fc25 to 2.17-1.fc25.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1489703] New: perl-DBD-Multi-1.01-1.fc28 FTBFS: t/
unavailable-server.t fails: DBI connect('dbname=fake;host=192.0.2.1','
fakeuser',...) failed: could not connect to server: Network is unreachable
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489703
Bug ID: 1489703
Summary: perl-DBD-Multi-1.01-1.fc28 FTBFS:
t/unavailable-server.t fails: DBI
connect('dbname=fake;host=192.0.2.1','fakeuser',...)
failed: could not connect to server: Network is
unreachable
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-Multi
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
External Bug ID: Github dwright/DBD-Multi/issues/2
perl-DBD-Multi-1.01-1.fc28 fails to build because a test fails on properly
configured network like this:
# Failed test 'Direct connection timed out'
# at t/unavailable-server.t line 45.
# Pausing up to 10 seconds to test timeout...
DBI connect('dbname=fake;host=192.0.2.1','fakeuser',...) failed: could not
connect to server: Network is unreachable
Is the server running on host "192.0.2.1" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432? at
/builddir/build/BUILD/DBD-Multi-1.01/blib/lib/DBD/Multi.pm line 441.
DBI connect('dbname=fake;host=192.0.2.1','fakeuser',...) failed: could not
connect to server: Network is unreachable
Is the server running on host "192.0.2.1" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432? at
/builddir/build/BUILD/DBD-Multi-1.01/blib/lib/DBD/Multi.pm line 441.
DBI connect('dbname=fake;host=192.0.2.1','fakeuser',...) failed: could not
connect to server: Network is unreachable
Is the server running on host "192.0.2.1" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432? at
/builddir/build/BUILD/DBD-Multi-1.01/blib/lib/DBD/Multi.pm line 441.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
t/unavailable-server.t ..
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed
This is because 92.0.2.0/24 destination is refused by a router with an ICMP
error message and the test does not expect it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1475786] New: Useless dependency on Test::MinimumVersion
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475786
Bug ID: 1475786
Summary: Useless dependency on Test::MinimumVersion
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Simple
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Simple build-requires Test::MinimumVersion, but the module is not
used at all in the code. I recommend removing the build-requirement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1494297] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.27 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494297
Bug ID: 1494297
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.27 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
caolanm(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 6.27
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.26-3.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3024/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 7 months