September 2017 - perl-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1198991] New: License tag should mention GPLv2+

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198991 Bug ID: 1198991 Summary: License tag should mention GPLv2+ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-Template Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tcallawa(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: CPAN 102523 External Bug ID: CPAN 102523 Current package, perl-Text-Template-1.45-17.fc23, declares license as "GPL+ or Artistic", but the content states "GPLv2+ or Artistic" many times. See upstream bug report <https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=102523>. I believe the license tag should be changed to "GPLv2+ or Artistic" (or to "(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)" until upstream clarifies the report). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zq8a82s6bW&a=cc_unsubscribe

6 years, 3 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1315525] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.05 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315525 Bug ID: 1315525 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pwouters(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psabata(a)redhat.com, pwouters(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.05 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.04-3.fc24 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

2
14
0 / 0

[Bug 1389064] New: EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 Bug ID: 1389064 Summary: EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr Assignee: mitr(a)redhat.com Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mitr(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: EPEL7 branch is missing for perl-IPTables-ChainMgr, preventing psad from being installed. Please build it for EPEL7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

2
7
0 / 0

[Bug 1486717] New: abi-compliance-checker-2.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486717 Bug ID: 1486717 Summary: abi-compliance-checker-2.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: abi-compliance-checker Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com, orion(a)nwra.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 2.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.1-2.fc27 URL: https://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/10/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 1392472] New: root is not built for ppc64

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 Bug ID: 1392472 Summary: root is not built for ppc64 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Alien-ROOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Blocks: 238953 (FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238953 [Bug 238953] ExcludeArch Tracker for ppc64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

2
13
0 / 0

[Bug 1392478] New: root is not built for ppc64le

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 Bug ID: 1392478 Summary: root is not built for ppc64le Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Alien-ROOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

2
12
0 / 0

[Bug 1447528] New: perl-MojoX-JSON-RPC-0.10-2.fc27 FTBFS: Can' t locate object method "is_status_class" via package "Mojo::Message:: Response"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447528 Bug ID: 1447528 Summary: perl-MojoX-JSON-RPC-0.10-2.fc27 FTBFS: Can't locate object method "is_status_class" via package "Mojo::Message::Response" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MojoX-JSON-RPC Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org External Bug ID: CPAN 121395 perl-MojoX-JSON-RPC-0.10-2.fc27 fails to build in F27 because tests fail like this: Can't locate object method "is_status_class" via package "Mojo::Message::Response" at t/../lib/MojoX/JSON/RPC/Client.pm line 111. # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 2. t/basic.t ...... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 34/36 subtests This is caused by upgrading perl-Mojolicious from 7.30-1.fc27 to 7.31-1.fc27 that removed deprecated methods. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1377996] New: perl-libxml-perl: Expanding external entities by default

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377996 Bug ID: 1377996 Summary: perl-libxml-perl: Expanding external entities by default Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: amaris(a)redhat.com CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com It was found that XML::LibXML is vulnerable to XXE attack as it has enabled external entity loading by default. Bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838097 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
14
0 / 0

[Bug 1480480] New: perl-RPM2-1.3-8.fc27 FTBFS: lib/RPM2.xs:157:20: error: 'RPMVSF_NOSHA1' undeclared

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480480 Bug ID: 1480480 Summary: perl-RPM2-1.3-8.fc27 FTBFS: lib/RPM2.xs:157:20: error: 'RPMVSF_NOSHA1' undeclared Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-RPM2 Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com perl-RPM2-1.3-8.fc27 fails to build in F27: gcc -I/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -DVERSION="1.3" -DXS_VERSION="1.3" -fPIC -DRPM2_API=4013 -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -o lib/RPM2.o lib/RPM2.c [...] lib/RPM2.xs: In function 'boot_RPM2': lib/RPM2.xs:154:20: error: 'RPMVSF_NOMD5HEADER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RPMVSF_NORSAHEADER'? REGISTER_CONSTANT(RPMVSF_NOMD5HEADER); ^ lib/RPM2.xs:134:70: note: in definition of macro 'REGISTER_CONSTANT' #define REGISTER_CONSTANT(name) _populate_constant(constants, #name, name) ^~~~ lib/RPM2.xs:154:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in REGISTER_CONSTANT(RPMVSF_NOMD5HEADER); ^ lib/RPM2.xs:134:70: note: in definition of macro 'REGISTER_CONSTANT' #define REGISTER_CONSTANT(name) _populate_constant(constants, #name, name) ^~~~ lib/RPM2.xs:157:20: error: 'RPMVSF_NOSHA1' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RPMVSF_NORSA'? REGISTER_CONSTANT(RPMVSF_NOSHA1); ^ lib/RPM2.xs:134:70: note: in definition of macro 'REGISTER_CONSTANT' #define REGISTER_CONSTANT(name) _populate_constant(constants, #name, name) ^~~~ This is caused by upgrading rpm-devel from 4.13.0.1-41.fc27 to 4.13.90-0.git14002.1.fc27. <https://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.14> mentions MD5 and SHA1 removal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1473017] New: amavisd-new-2.11.0-1 has issue with DCC, can' t write to /etc/dcc

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473017 Bug ID: 1473017 Summary: amavisd-new-2.11.0-1 has issue with DCC, can't write to /etc/dcc Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: amavisd-new Severity: low Assignee: j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com Reporter: pb(a)bieringer.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org, vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com Description of problem: since upgrading EL7 system strange DCC messages are occuring. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): amavisd-new-2.11.0-1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. have amavisd+spamassassin+DCC installed Actual results: Jul 19 22:29:57 *** dccproc[29496]: open(/etc/dcc/map): Permission denied Jul 19 22:29:57 *** dccproc[29496]: lock_open(/etc/dcc/whiteclnt.dccx): Permission denied; file not writeable for locking Expected results: Working as before the update Additional info: related systemd unit file changed, 2.11.0-1 added: ProtectSystem=full This prevents dccproc from writing to /etc/dcc "Workaround": reduce restriction to ProtectSystem=true Looks like systemd.exec is missing a feature, because ReadWritePaths=-/etc/dcc is not supported on ProtectSystem=full, only on ProtectSystem=strict (which is even more hard...) Imho "full" should already honor ReadWritePaths -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
6
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel September 2017