https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
"FeRD" (Frank Dana) <ferdnyc(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ferdnyc(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from "FeRD" (Frank Dana) <ferdnyc(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #12)
However, while having zero knowledge about the package, I wonder if symlinks
are the right solution. It seems to me that in this case the fonts can be
considered web assets and should follow the appropriate guideline [1]. That
means these should be served from the proper place and just the common
virtual font requires should be used instead.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts
I've submitted
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/2 which makes
changes along the lines of what Vit outlined here. It sets the internal
fontpath of the package to /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/ instead of
using the symlinked indirection via /usr/share/rt/fonts/, and depends on
font(droidsans) and font(droidsansfallback) instead of using filesystem paths.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...