rails 3.0.x in F15
by Mo Morsi
Based on my discussions with the community and various parties that
have a vested interest in this, I feel that it is a good idea to move
the rubygem-rails packages to rails 3.0.x for F15 so that we don't get
left behind and stay up to date w/ the latest / greatest upstream releases.
Unfortunately this process isn't as simple as updating the 6 rails
packages (rails itself and the active/action* packages), there are many
various gems which will need to be updated as well to work with Rails 3.
Based on my findings w/ deltacloud [1], the update process itself isn't
so difficult, but some of the following gems will need to be updated in
Fedora for things to properly work. Most likely more will need to be as
well, these are just the ones that I've found, but conversely all of
these may not need to be updated, as I installed Rails 3 via gem which
pulled in the latest version of all these packages.
* rails, activesupport, activerecord, actionpack, activeresource, actionmailer - 2.3.8 -> 3.0.1 (mmorsi)
* compass - 0.8.17 -> 0.10.6 (mmorsi)
* cucumber - 0.9.0 -> 0.9.3 (kanarip, mfojtik, mkent, stahnma)
* erubis - 2.6.5 -> 2.6.6 (mkent)
* gherkin - 2.2.4 -> 2.2.9 (mfojtik)
* haml - 3.0.17 -> 3.0.23 (mkent, kanarip)
* polyglot - 0.2.5 -> 0.3.1 (kanarip, stahnma)
* rack - 1.1.0 -> 1.2.1 (kanarip, stahnma)
* rack-test - 0.5.4 -> 0.5.6 (mfojtik)
* rspec - 1.3.0 -> 2.0.1 (stahnma)
* simple-navigation - 3.0.0 -> 3.0.2 (mfojtik)
* sinatra - 1.0 -> 1.1.0 (mfojtik)
* sqlite3-ruby - 1.2.4 -> 1.3.2 (kanarip, stahnma)
* term-ansicolor - 1.0.3 -> 1.0.5 (hpejakle, mfojtik)
* thor - 0.13.6 -> 0.14.3 (mkent)
* treetop - 1.3.0 -> 1.4.8 (stahnma)
Also the following are new gems which will need to be packaged
* arel (1.0.1)
* autotest (4.4.2)
* bundler (1.0.3)
* database_cleaner (0.6.0)
* factory_girl_rails (1.0)
* i18n (0.4.2)
* mail (2.2.29)
* tilt (1.1)
* timecop (0.3.5)
* rack-mount (0.6.13)
* railties (3.0.1)
* rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
* tzinfo (0.3.23)
In the upcoming weeks (most likely starting after the new year) I will
be looking to updating the rails packages themselves and coordinating
updates with the owners of these gems. I also think it might be a good
idea to submit a feature request for Fedora 15 for Rails 3.
Thoughts, comments, and help with any and all of this would be very much
appreciated. Thanks alot.
-Mo
[1] http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/331
13 years, 1 month
Ruby stack and rails in EPEL 6
by Michael Stahnke
We talked it over with the ruby sig and decided that rails 3.x was
probably best for EPEL6. However, since then, I have run into several
packages, including ones I use everyday that require rails 2.3.x or
it's dependencies. I am proposing to put in rails 2.3.x and then have
a rails3 package set when rails 3 is packaged in Fedora and ready to
go. Currently, it looks like that might hit for F15, but then will
probably take some additional work to get it ready for EPEL.
On a side note, rubygems.org now has as many package as CPAN does for
perl. We could really use a lot more ruby packagers.
Also, if you are packaging something for Fedora and don't wish to
maintain in EPEL, please email me. I will likely take the EPEL
branches.
stahnma
13 years, 4 months
EPEL6 Rails Version
by Michael Stahnke
I've been wondering which version of Rails we should try to put into
EPEL6. Right now, obviously, Rails 2.3.x is pretty popular, however,
in looking forward at a 7 year life-cycle, it seems like Rails 3 might
be a good idea. My fear however, is that even the next version of
Rails 3 will have abi/api breakage, so it will be very difficult to
move.
Thoughts?
stahnma
13 years, 4 months
[Fwd: Re: Review Request 661436 - rubygem-heroku & rubygem-launchy]
by Minnikhanov
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 02:11 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Minnikhanov wrote, at 12/11/2010 02:09 AM +9:00:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I just finished packaging up rubygem-heroku and rubygem-launchy.
> > Make Review Request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 .
> > Check my Review Request, please.
> > I wish to be sponsored.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
>
> I am now checking.
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru
Your advices will be very helpfull.
Next I plan to packed
devise-1.0.9_20101209.gem - it is for rails ~>2.3 <3.
For run-time dependencies need warden.gem .
I download:
warden-0.10.7_20101209.gem
warden-1.0.2_20101209.gem
I don't know what version ( warden-0.10.7 or warden-1.0.2 ) packed for
devise-1.0.9 .
Best regards.
13 years, 4 months