Hi,
we are trying to address this in a way we believe is the least
intrusive. However, the work is slow as we have other higher priority items.
Keep in mind that we are trying to find and implement a way that won't
bring more work to packagers of new gems,
work to us with trying to add a few lines to specfiles and then
rebuilding the whole ecosystem.
And at the same time won't impact the experience of Ruby developers that
are using Fedora for their project.
[0] See thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...
Vít has raised a few points there that I have on my backlog to even
respond to.
On 10/2/22 08:33, Benson Muite wrote:
When reviewing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127693
fonts are embedded in the generated HTML documentation. It seems that
one can remove the font files and replace them with soft links to the
font files in the packages:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/lato-fonts/lato-fonts/
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts/adobe...
Is this a reasonable thing to do as it would greatly reduce file
duplication?
We do not need font files there at all, the browser will find them in
the right locations as long as the font packages are installed.
(Well, the CSS files seem to be smart enough for that anyway.)
If so, can this change be applied to all rubygem packages? Can create
pull requests for the rubygem packages in Pagure.
Regards,
Jarek Prokop