Hello, nice work! From a swift look on the list any `simplecov` might not be needed IMO.

It would be nice to know what cucumber version will be required for this to build since there were renames of multiple packages that cucumber depends on, for example the gem `cucumber-expressions` was renamed to `cucumber-cucumber-expressions`.

Regards, Jarek On 30/09/2020 21:33, Pavel Valena wrote: > Hello, > > following on my previous email (bellow), I'm working on regenerating > the list of packages `ruby-rails` group in Koschei. > > I've done some fixes to package resolving in my script (I'm left with > 3 unresolved /ambiguous/ packages as well), and got current list: >    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/ccdd482ace158bc55c891528e2be22ce

> > > I'm also thinking of a way to get list of packages that are requiring > the dependency (let me know if you want to see that). > > Proposed (generated) changes: >    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/dd00dafa1bf37b8f74312b57e650d8b0 >   + means addition >   - means removal

> > There are some suspicious entries, like `+rubygem-rspec2`, which will > need further investigation. I'll welcome any additional feedback on > packages that are missing, or should not be in this group.

> > Currently failing (dependent) packages: >    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/f9b40fdebed1b9864ea1e1c7fedcb14a > > _ _ _ _ > > Additionaly, Ruby on Rails was updated to 6.0.3.3 in Rawhide and F33 > has update pending: >    https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-83a4999b7c >    https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4dd34860a3 > > Please let me know if this breaks something for you. You can see my > test passing here: >    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/350309be47258e9bdb0e01f7e04fde12 > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...

From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:31:10 AM Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 Dne 30. 09. 20 v 22:16 Jaroslav Prokop napsal(a): > Hello, > > nice work! > From a swift look on the list any `simplecov` might not be needed IMO. There might be some package pulling in simplecov, but we typically remove this dependency, so it would probably make sense to identify how simplecov gets on the list and remove the dependency.

> > > It would be nice to know what cucumber version will be required for > this to build > since there were renames of multiple packages that cucumber depends on, > for example the gem `cucumber-expressions` was renamed to > `cucumber-cucumber-expressions`. Yes, there were huge reorganization in upstream cucumber. Any help with getting recent cucumber into Fedora would be appreciated.

> > Regards, > Jarek > > On 30/09/2020 21:33, Pavel Valena wrote: >> Hello, >> >> following on my previous email (bellow), I'm working on regenerating >> the list of packages `ruby-rails` group in Koschei. >> >> I've done some fixes to package resolving in my script (I'm left with >> 3 unresolved /ambiguous/ packages as well), and got current list: >>    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/ccdd482ace158bc55c891528e2be22ce I think there is missing rubygem-mysql2, which might not appear anywhere, because it is just optional, but we should not forget to include it in the list. For the similar reason, it would be nice to keep rubygem-mongo on the list.

>> >> >> I'm also thinking of a way to get list of packages that are requiring >> the dependency (let me know if you want to see that). >> >> Proposed (generated) changes: >>    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/dd00dafa1bf37b8f74312b57e650d8b0 >>   + means addition >>   - means removal Removed rubygem-web-console? I think it is one of the debug dependencies of default RoR app. Or was this changed? rubygem-debug_inspector might be the same case. And removed rubygem-sass-rails? That also is surprising to me. Also, what happened to sdoc?

And ruby itself should definitely be on the list.

>> >> There are some suspicious entries, like `+rubygem-rspec2`, which will >> need further investigation. I'll welcome any additional feedback on >> packages that are missing, or should not be in this group. It would be nice to get rid of RSpec2, but last time I checked, it did not seems to be really easy.

Vít >> >> Currently failing (dependent) packages: >>    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/f9b40fdebed1b9864ea1e1c7fedcb14a >> >> _ _ _ _ >> >> Additionaly, Ruby on Rails was updated to 6.0.3.3 in Rawhide and F33 >> has update pending: >>    https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-83a4999b7c >>    https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4dd34860a3 >> >> Please let me know if this breaks something for you. You can see my >> test passing here: >>    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/350309be47258e9bdb0e01f7e04fde12 >> >> Regards,

From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 12:02:02 PM Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 Dne 01. 10. 20 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a): > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:31:10 AM >> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 >> >> >> Dne 30. 09. 20 v 22:16 Jaroslav Prokop napsal(a): >> >>> On 30/09/2020 21:33, Pavel Valena wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> following on my previous email (bellow), I'm working on regenerating >>>> the list of packages `ruby-rails` group in Koschei. >>>> >>>> I've done some fixes to package resolving in my script (I'm left with >>>> 3 unresolved /ambiguous/ packages as well), and got current list: >>>>    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/ccdd482ace158bc55c891528e2be22ce >> >> I think there is missing rubygem-mysql2, which might not appear >> anywhere, because it is just optional, but we should not forget to >> include it in the list. For the similar reason, it would be nice to keep >> rubygem-mongo on the list. > Hmm, but if it's not in the buildroot, should we concern ourselves with it? > Or do we care for weak dependencies the same? I could add those explicitly > (Recommends -> Require for those builds), or could be just on some > "Includelist" WDYT? I think there should be some initial list of packages we do care about, this should be probably: ruby

rubygem-rails and actually everything what appears in the Gemfile of fresh RoR app

and some DB adapters: rubygem-mysql2 rubygem-mongo rubygem-pg (mongo got somehow pulled in, but it is just by coincidence I'd say).

>> And ruby itself should definitely be on the list. > Well, isn't `ruby` other group? I've opted for `rubygems-` packages only. I think we were talking about RoR group, which might not be just about rubygems. Actually, we might be missing js-jquery for example. There used to be also some other js- dependencies required by RoR app.

V.

From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 10:28:42 AM Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 Dne 01. 10. 20 v 20:21 Pavel Valena napsal(a): > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 12:02:02 PM >> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 >> >> >> Dne 01. 10. 20 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a): >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:31:10 AM >>>> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 >>>> >>>> >>>> Dne 30. 09. 20 v 22:16 Jaroslav Prokop napsal(a): >>>> >>>>> On 30/09/2020 21:33, Pavel Valena wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> following on my previous email (bellow), I'm working on regenerating >>>>>> the list of packages `ruby-rails` group in Koschei. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've done some fixes to package resolving in my script (I'm left with >>>>>> 3 unresolved /ambiguous/ packages as well), and got current list: >>>>>>    https://gist.github.com/pvalena/ccdd482ace158bc55c891528e2be22ce >>>> I think there is missing rubygem-mysql2, which might not appear >>>> anywhere, because it is just optional, but we should not forget to >>>> include it in the list. For the similar reason, it would be nice to keep >>>> rubygem-mongo on the list. >>> Hmm, but if it's not in the buildroot, should we concern ourselves with >>> it? >>> Or do we care for weak dependencies the same? I could add those >>> explicitly >>> (Recommends -> Require for those builds), or could be just on some >>> "Includelist" WDYT? >> >> I think there should be some initial list of packages we do care about, >> this should be probably: >> >> ruby > Not sure about ruby itself. Rails could theoretically run on any ruby > runtime, right? We don't have any other runtime ...

> Anyway there's not much harm to have it there, if you insist. I'm simply > missing the point, ... now I realized. We don't have a `ruby` Koschei > group. Maybe that's something we want instead? It is probably easier to search for "ruby". I don't want to create some dump groups, which will nobody care about. "rails" group would deserve more attention on itself.

> >> rubygem-rails and actually everything what appears in the Gemfile of >> fresh RoR app > Ok, good idea. Although we currently don't have the asset pipeline > (webpacker). Please don't add on the list any packages we don't have (sorry, couldn't resist :D)

> >> and some DB adapters: >> >> rubygem-mysql2 >> >> rubygem-mongo >> >> rubygem-pg (mongo got somehow pulled in, but it is just by coincidence >> I'd say). > > Yes, I think this corresponds to comps group. I'll take all packages from > there. Good idea. V.