I am dropping this proposal for now.
Vít
Dne 17.9.2013 10:21, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
I proposed this change to FPC:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/345
Vít
Dne 3.9.2013 13:14, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hi Rubyists,
>
> Binary ruby- and rubygem- packages ships .so files. These .so files
> are picked up by RPM's automatic Requires/Provides generater and they
> are listed among provides, e.g.:
>
> $ repoquery -q --provides rubygem-sqlite3
> rubygem(sqlite3) = 1.3.5-4.fc19
> rubygem-sqlite3 = 1.3.5-4.fc19
> rubygem-sqlite3(x86-64) = 1.3.5-4.fc19
> sqlite3_native.so()(64bit)
>
> However, these .so files are not useful outside of Ruby world and
> they might even conflict with some system library (although I don't
> have any example at my hand currently). So I believe, we should
> filter out these automatic provides, as is done in Perl for example.
> Therefore, since F19, there are available %{?ruby_default_filter} and
> %{?rubygems_default_filter} macros, which allow to filter out these
> provides.
>
> For your curiosity, this is their implementation:
>
> %ruby_default_filter %{expand: \
> %global __provides_exclude_from
>
%{?__provides_exclude_from:%{__provides_exclude_from}|}^(%{ruby_vendorarchdir}|%{ruby_sitearchdir})/.*\\\\.so$
> \
> }
>
> %rubygems_default_filter %{expand: \
> %global __provides_exclude_from
> %{?__provides_exclude_from:%{__provides_exclude_from}|}^%{gem_extdir_mri}/.*\\\\.so$
> \
> }
>
> If nobody objects, I am going to propose usage of these macros into
> Ruby packaging guidelines [1].
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> [1]
>
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=PackagingDrafts/Ruby&diff...
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig