Re: Duplicate bugs or?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:03:59PM -0400, David Cafaro wrote:
Was looking over Torque bugs (I have one I'm working on), and
noticed these two which are fst_owner=Sparks:
Yeah, I had grabbed them as a result of them being EPEL orphans.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098583
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098584
They appear to be duplicates of each other. The both refer to the same CVE and say they
cover EPEL-ALL (yet both list EL6 as version).
Because of limited functionality in BZ, when a vulnerability affects all EPEL versions a
single ticket is opened (EPEL-ALL) but the version is the latest version seen (in this
case el6).
Am I missing something or are they duplicates? Or should one cover EL5?
These do appear to be duplicates. This could have been a script error. Since these
tickets were opened back in May I suspect the problem has been remedied but I'll
verify. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
- -- Eric
- --------------------------------------------------
Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Fedora Project
sparks(a)fedoraproject.org - sparks(a)redhat.com
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
- --------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=qmtJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----