On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 12:21 -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
I've already started seeing some successes in closing some
security
bugs. I'd like to try to prioritize our efforts a bit. On the
Security Team wiki page I provided links to security bugs based on
their urgency (Critical -> Important -> Moderate -> Low). We should
also prioritize our efforts within those categories as oldest to
newest. I'm hoping that the older vulnerabilities have already been
closed and the tickets just left open. If not we should definitely get
them fixed.
By the way, the links on the wiki look at all vulnerabilities in Fedora
and EPEL (bugs tagged with Keywords: SecurityTracking). I think I'll
modify the query to not show bugs that already have an fst_owner so
people only see what's not taken. Thoughts?
+1 for showing bugs with no fst_owner.
-- Eric
-------------------------------------------------- Eric "Sparks"
Christensen Fedora Project
sparks(a)fedoraproject.org - sparks(a)redhat.com 097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2
E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
--------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ security-team mailing
list security-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/security-team
JT