On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:39:50PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/01/2015 11:06 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>ehlo,
>
>attached is alternative version for ticket 2744.
>The unit test passed but there is a performance improvement.
>
>If we compare 3rd patch to current master than
>there is a 10 less invocation of malloc (an also other functions) per group.
>and we saved allocation of 1091 per group.
>
>There was a comment[1] in old thread about a possibility of double sanitized dn.
>I was not able to find such case. I would be glad if someone
>can extend unit test which will pass with master and fail with attached patch.
>
>LS
>
>[1]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2015-August/024346.html
Looks like I misunderstood your original proposal. This looks indeed better.
I see now why double-sanitization is not an issue.
Ack.
CI:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/26/93/summary.html
master:
* 2cec08a3174bff951c048c57b4b0e4517ad6b7b1
* 6cb5bad3c8e2f35ca9dce1800a506d626f90c079
* 3d8b576bf49a79d5776574b96c6ef9535bbc46ac
* 9c563db822758732b25a3c8c61ffac90a7deffc3