On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:45 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 09:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:14 +0100, Pierre Carrier wrote:
> >> Hello Stephen,
> >>
> >> On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:54, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>> It would make much more sense to implement a new policy type and
handle
> >>> this there.
> >>
> >> Agreed. We could then cleanly implement the policies defined in
> >> [MS-ADTS].
> >>
> >> Hopefully I'll get a test env up and running soon to work on that.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >
> > Hello Pierre,
> >
> > This discussion fell off my radar, but I wanted to follow up and see
> >
> > if you had done any further work on finishing up this patch. Anything we
> > can do to help?
>
> As far as I know Pierre left Red Hat, so I doubt he will be finishing
> the patch.
Stephen,
I took the original patch and I made changes you requested along with some
fixes you missed. Please take a look if the patch needs anything else.
Thanks
Jan
Nack. The idea was not to use ldap_pwd_policy=shadow but to add a new
ldap_pwd_policy=ad