Perhaps it would be good to create a repository for such submissions.
They could be linked from the section where they were intended, but
include comments that make it clear they are not part of TOSW yet are
included for archival purposes / future reference, as well as--and I
think this would be the greatest value--a point for ongoing discussion
and reflection.
As I read this example, I too find some problems with the tone, but I
wonder if they are the same as yours? Discussions around these types of
contributions, even if never included, provides an opportunity for
greater education and understanding among the community: why aren't the
contributions included? what is the issue(s) with tone?
I'll go out on a limb and offer, one issue I have is that I don't like
the idea of promotion/demotion. Might the idea of merit and role be
better represented as reputation, commitment and/or participation
(something else)? Whatever the case, the resulting discussions would
help develop a common understanding of language, concepts, values,
principles, etc. which in turn would help, not only organize and
clearify TOSW, but also develop it by identifying areas then need
further development and refinement.
Just a thought,
Patrick
On 08/14/2014 08:21 AM, Joseph Ottinger wrote:
These are patches for "community care and feeding,"
contributed for historical reasons and NOT so they can be integrated. The tone is wrong,
on rereading, but I hate to just lose the content.
Here's what it is, if you aren't desperate to read the patches themselves:
------------------------
Imagine if you grow a garden and are very ambitious. The first year you overplant and are
unwilling to thin out the seedlings. You end up with overcrowded, unhealthy plants.
In practice, communities need to grow at manageable rates, with measurable positive
impact. This means that in the formation of a community, you may need to be somewhat
discerning in how you accept and promote community members. This also implies that
sometimes you need to be willing to demote community members for the sake of how the
community operates.
It's important to maintain the community's perspective separately from an
individual community member's opinion; a given member may rub someone else the wrong
way, or be otherwise difficult to get along with, but still offer valuable contributions.
Such a person might find it difficult to be promoted in a community - because a community
is, at its heart, a political body - but such a person also shouldn't be demoted or
otherwise weeded out (using our gardening analogy) without just cause from the entire
community's perspective.
Rely on both contributions and general opinion when deciding to accept or demote
community members; if the overall opinion of a promotion is horror and surprise, it's
probably not a very good idea. Further, promotion should be based on merit, and not merely
opinion (or, as happens often in new projects, desperation for higher user counts).
A careful approach to managing the community establishes a rhythm of growth; careful
tending means your community is built of its strongest potential members, which makes for
a strong community.
_______________________________________________
tosw mailing list
tosw(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/tosw
--
|| | | |||| || || | |||| ||| | |||
Patrick Masson
General Manager, Director & Secretary to the Board
Open Source Initiative
855 El Camino Real, Ste 13A, #270
Palo Alto, CA 94301
United States
OSI Phone: (415) 857-5398
Direct Phone: (970) 4MASSON
Skype: massonpj
Em: masson(a)opensource.org <mailto:masson@opensource.org>
Ws:
www.opensource.org <
http://www.opensource.org>