On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 17:09 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:43:55PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 18:11 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I've built a qemu image in here:
> >
> >
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1102151
> >
> > It contains the basic work to get qemu package updated. Basically,
> > we're talking about getting the qemu code from svn
> ...
>
> Another thing to watch out for is the guidelines for numbering
> pre-release snapshots:
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_pack...
>
> According to those, I think this should be 0.9.2-0.1.svn6392 rather than
> 0.9.1-svn6392.
Let's let it this way for now.
Let's follow the guidelines carefully written by people with more
packaging experience than us :-)
I believe it's not yet certain that the new version will be
called
0.9.2, right?
I think the point is 0.9.2 > 0.9.1, not so much that 0.9.2 will be what
the next version will be called.
Cheers,
Mark.