Eric,
I was going to do OVS after I got things working with a fresh install, so I
don't find it objectionable.
Can you point me to a howto for configuring OVS and virsh net-edit to
accomplish this?
I dont think I have sufficient virt-fu to accomplish it on my own.
Best Regards,
Bob
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM, VISEUR Eric <
eric.viseur(a)be.thalesgroup.com> wrote:
Hello Robert,
I personally use Open VSwitch for such pruposes, it requires a bit more
work but is much more flexible in the end. Would that sound like an
acceptable solution?
Best regards,
*Eric VISEUR* | System Engineer | *THALES Belgium S.A.*
Rue des Frères Taymans, 28 |B-1480 TUBIZE - BELGIUM
Phone : +32 2 391 23 74 | Cell : +32 497 92 36 80 |
eric.viseur(a)be.thalesgroup.com
*From:* virt-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:
virt-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert Strickler
*Sent:* 18 September, 2014 03:49
*To:* virt(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
*Subject:* [fedora-virt] vanilla bridging network
I am trying to define a network tht just bridges the traffic between the
virtual machine network and the LAN attached to eth0
No dnsmasq/dhcp as it is difficult to impossible to tie dnsmasq to the
master ISC servers on the LAN.
It should forward/receive packets like a standard hardware bridge
The virtual guests should get their addressing from the dhcp server on the
LAN and DNS from the server as well.
with the following I can not get dhcp discover reply from the LAN server,
nor can I manually code the IP/gateway/DNS and ping the hard address
(172.30.2.33) can anyone tell me what I am missing? Vhost and vguest are
both CENTOS7
======================
<networkstatus>
<class_id bitmap='0-2'/>
<floor sum='0'/>
<network>
<name>plain</name>
<uuid>31f78c2c-257d-4c57-82e5-0c53deadbeef</uuid>
<forward mode='bridge'/>
<bridge name='virbr1' />
<mac address='52:54:00:b1:34:77'/>
<domain name='plain'/>
<ip address='172.30.2.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'>
<dhcp relay='yes'/>
<dhcp enable='no' relay='yes'/>
<!--
The relay will not be started if the "enable" property is 'no':
-->
</ip>
</network>
</networkstatus>
===========================
A routed environment would be acceptable, but bridged is better as it
should not be required to change my routing on the gateway router
TIA,
Bob