Re: which bug to bug?
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:45 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
Which bugzilla component should receive bugs for formal Fedora
websites?
FDP created the 'fedora-websites' component in response to a need to
receive and channel such bugs.
However, the Fedora Infrastructure group already existed. Should that
have the component that receives website bug traffic?
Thanks for bringing this to the list where it belonged... I pinged
Karsten in a Bugzilla entry earlier today about this issue. My feeling
is that we don't want to make it harder for users to tell us about
website problems, but we also want to help them put bugs in the right
place when possible.
My main desire is to reduce confusion.[1] We've had some good
beginnings using the FDP-based component, but I'm happy to move our
group of bug responders over to the FI-based component.
[1] Speaking of which, anyone know how to remove or deprecate the
'fedora-docs' component in the 'Fedora Core' category?
I cc'd this to Dan Williams because I think I remember somebody saying
he was the King of All Bugzilla. Certainly that odd component needs to
vanish now that we have our own product category.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)