-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I like the simplicity of the Gnome website too.
Thomas Chung wrote:
On 4/24/07, Thomas Chung <tchung(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> So Fedora is starting to mature a bit more in size and I wanted
>>
> to get
>> this ball rolling.
>>
>> Since
fedora.redhat.com is now gone the wiki is our official
>> content site. There's a couple problems with that, performance
>> is an
> issue and
>> most content on the wiki is developer oriented. One thing
>> we're
> working
>> on right now for the F7 release is a simple plone instance for
>> the
fedoraproject.org landing page. Note, the wiki isn't going
>> away,
> but
>> when users go to
fedoraproject.org they'll see more end-user
> content.
>>
>> My question for you guys is, once FAS2 is done and we get into
> having
>> more 'official content'. What do you guys want to do with a
>> plone site? The doc's guys will have their own site. Is
>> anyone
> interested in
>> this project? The idea is that the 'official' fedora site will
>>
> be very
>> small. Having only minimal information for end users and
>> potential contributors. It would then link to the larger sites
>> like the wiki.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Mike
>
> Hi Mike, Can we see the site in development yet? I've been
> thinking we could use the plone site for
> news/communication/marketing site for fedora end-users. Of course
> a plenty of distribution/project information should be available
> which lead to joining various Fedora Projects including
> developments and testings.
BTW, I really like simply approach such as
http://www.gnome.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGL7HtX5FtsCrAzXYRAmucAJ4sMNVVbr5hyqU8Ko0zWUL4rbmAJwCgqSII
jD6Yf96XtqFi6Ki+DwbkUCk=
=1ZNK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----