On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 09:37 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Karsten Wade wrote:
> Very, very, very lightweight calendar, please. I find that they full-
> featured groupware-type stuff coming through a WUI ... is, uh ... not my
> favorite way to do things. I'd much rather a semi-readable, hand-edited
> Wiki.
Yep. I see the calendars as simple, authoritative ics files. One for all
the meetings, one for events, one for release schedule for FC. That's it.
Fine enough. :)
> We really need something we can make PO files from, if we want
to keep
> content easily updated. These can then be checked into CVS and pulled
> out by the trans teams.
>
> Remember, they have existing tools, we do not. We must make our tools
> use their tools, from the start. We can request an odd-ball, one-off
> translation now and again, but not on a regular basis.
So, what can we make PO files from? Is the current f.r.c system in CVS
good enough for this?
No. xml2po is what we use for documentation, and the stuff in CVS is
far from that.
That said, if we have a regular $FORMAT the files are in, we could task
someone with writing or modifying a tool to create PO files from
whatever.
That said, it is probably better to do the site in XML, instead.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Content Services Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject