[389-devel] Re: Please review: pep8 fixes for lib389

On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:57 +0200, Martin Basti wrote: > On 10.06.2016 07:21, William Brown wrote: >> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48878 >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48878/0001-Ticket-48878-pe... >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48878/0001-Ticket-48878-pe... >> >> >> >> -- >> 389-devel mailing list >> 389-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject... > Hello, some notes if I can :) > > 1) > This change is harder to read with PEP8 > - topology.standalone.backends.create(None, > - properties={ > - BACKEND_NAME: NEW_BACKEND_1, > - 'suffix':NEW_SUFFIX_1, > - }) > + topology.standalone.backends.create(None, properties={ > + BACKEND_NAME: NEW_BACKEND_1, > + 'suffix': NEW_SUFFIX_1, > + }) > ents = topology.standalone.backends.list() > for ent in ents: > topology.standalone.log.info("List(%d): backend %s" % > > I suggest to use > topology.standalone.backends.create( > None, properties={ > BACKEND_NAME: NEW_BACKEND_1, > 'suffix': NEW_SUFFIX_1, > }) > > Same for NEW_BACKEND_2 Done! https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48878/0001-Ticket-48878-be... > 2) > I'm not sure if change in python-lib389.spec belongs to PEP8 related > patch or if it is related to PEP8 > > Otherwise LGTM for PEP8 fixes :) > The idea was that basically this is a "house keeping" ticket to get ready for release. That's why I put them there. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject...