Re: [fedora-astronomy] Iraf fork?

2008/5/26 Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks(a)gmail.com&gt;: > On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:12:39 +0200, you wrote: > >> Sergio Pascual wrote: >>>> If I understood well, our better (and only ?) option if we want IRAF >>>> in Fedora is to push it to our trac server and work hard, right ? ( i >>>> do not consider the waiting solution ) >>> Yes, that's my opinion. But I would like to hear some others. >> Sadly true that it's our last solution. > An alternative is to not include iraf in Fedora directly but instead > package it up for RPM Fusion (rpmfusion.org). > > While obviously not ideal it does at least get iraf packaged for > Fedora, and a project to replace the non-free bits could still go > ahead without the pressure of getting iraf in as soon as possible. > It looks like a good compromise. But it must be considered only as a *temporary* solution.