autoqa-devel August 2011

autoqa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

8 participants
75 discussions

[AutoQA] #209: complete auto CD install test driver
by fedora-badges 02 Aug '11

02 Aug '11

#209: complete auto CD install test driver -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: liam | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Automate installation test plan Component: tests | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- complete the cd_install.py as dvd_install.py to support CD install, with some functions like automatically swap CD when CD1 install was completed. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/209> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 2

[AutoQA] #365: update mediakit_sanity.py to accept different images, DVD, Live, netinst.iso
by fedora-badges 02 Aug '11

02 Aug '11

#365: update mediakit_sanity.py to accept different images, DVD, Live, netinst.iso -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: hongqing | Owner: hongqing Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Automate installation test plan Component: tests | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- mediakit_sanity test covers the DVD.iso sanity test cases. But the Live.iso and netinst.iso are different with DVD.iso, they cannot be done repoclosure and fileconficts tests. mediakit_sanity should be updated to accept Live.iso and netinst.iso sanity tests. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/365> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 1

Very Rough Code for Mock Fedora Infrastructure
by Tim Flink 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

This kept falling off my TODO list, but I finally got what I have for initial mock Fedora infrastructure code up on github:

4 6

[AutoQA] #364: test.py: 'Unknown result keyword' handling in cmp_result()
by fedora-badges 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

#364: test.py: 'Unknown result keyword' handling in cmp_result() ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: pschindl | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Finger Food Component: core | Keywords: ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Test.py raise exception when unknown result keyword is used in PrettyLog.summary_detail dictionary: {{{ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/parallel.py", line 18, in fork_start l() File "/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/job.py", line 522, in <lambda> l = lambda : test.runtest(self, url, tag, args, dargs) File "/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/test.py", line 115, in runtest job.sysinfo.log_after_each_iteration) File "/usr/share/autotest/client/common_lib/test.py", line 710, in runtest mytest._exec(args, dargs) File "/usr/share/autotest/client/common_lib/test.py", line 419, in _exec _call_test_function(self.execute, *p_args, **p_dargs) File "/usr/share/autotest/client/common_lib/test.py", line 630, in _call_test_function raise error.UnhandledTestFail(e) UnhandledTestFail: Unhandled ValueError: tuple.index(x): x not in tuple Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/autotest/client/common_lib/test.py", line 623, in _call_test_function return func(*args, **dargs) File "/usr/share/autotest/client/common_lib/test.py", line 291, in execute postprocess_profiled_run, args, dargs) File "/usr/share/autotest/client/common_lib/test.py", line 215, in _call_run_once self.postprocess_iteration() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/test.py", line 135, in postprocess_iteration self.post_results() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/test.py", line 183, in post_results logname = self._write_log(test_detail) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/test.py", line 313, in _write_log log.write(test_detail.create_output(full_log=full_log)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/test.py", line 561, in create_output return self.log.create() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/pretty_log.py", line 245, in create summary_detail = self._make_summary_detail() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/pretty_log.py", line 87, in _make_summary_detail cmp=lambda x,y: td.cmp_result(x,y)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/pretty_log.py", line 87, in <lambda> cmp=lambda x,y: td.cmp_result(x,y)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autoqa/test.py", line 499, in cmp_result index1 = self.result_order.index(result1) if result1 is not None else -1 ValueError: tuple.index(x): x not in tuple }}} Problem is in cmp_result() from test.py. It compares only results which are in result_order tuple. We can write some reasonable error message or we can rewrite cmp_result to handle this problem (then it is needed to check if it won't break something). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/364> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 5

[AutoQA] #349: Depcheck - prefilter the list of packages passed to yum instance's rpmdb
by fedora-badges 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

#349: Depcheck - prefilter the list of packages passed to yum instance's rpmdb ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jskladan | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 0.6.0 Component: core | Keywords: ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Recent problem with libreport <http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/140482-autotest/172.16.0.20/depchec…> is most probably caused by depcheck selecting too old packages (i.e. ignoring the newest packages in repos) due to the fact that YUM selects packages alphabeticaly on fist-comes-first served basis. Because YUM is hacked into believing that all packages are installed by passing the content of _whole_ pkgsack into the rpmdb, it contains multiple versions of the same package. I belive, that this can be easily solved by pre-filtering the list, so it contains only the newest from each package. <code> # This YumBase object will act like all repo packages are already installed y = YumDepcheck() y.tsInfo = yum.transactioninfo.TransactionData() y.tsInfo.debug = 1 # this line is causing the problems y.rpmdb = MetaSackRPMDB(yum_repos.pkgSack) y.xsack = yum.packageSack.PackageSack() # Hacky way to set up the databases (this is copied from yum's testbase.py) y.tsInfo.setDatabases(y.rpmdb, y.xsack) </code> the yum_repos.pkgSack is a list of tuples NAEVR <code>[('libreport', 'x86_64', '0', '2.0.2', '5.fc15'), ('libreport', 'i686', '0', '2.0.2', '5.fc15'), ('libreport', 'x86_64', '0', '2.0.4', '1.fc15'), ('libreport', 'i686', '0', '2.0.4', '1.fc15')]</code> After the filtering, only the newest package for each architecture should be left. Newest = the first while sorting using E,V,R as keys with decreasing importance in this order. I.e. <code> [('libreport', 'x86_64', '0', '2.0.4', '1.fc15'), ('libreport', 'i686', '0', '2.0.4', '1.fc15')]</code>. koji_utils.compareEVR() can be used to compare EVRs. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/349> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

autoqa-devel August 2011