autoqa-devel February 2013

autoqa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

9 participants
14 discussions

[Fedora Build Service] Review request
by Petr Schindler 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

Hi, I've made a quick fix to [1]. Here is the patch for review, you can find it also attached to this mail. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-build-service/ticket/9 ---------------------PATCH------------------------------------------- diff --git a/client/imagebuild.py b/client/imagebuild.py index 78a29d4c6b7bb8cbae6c75f9178d8d11549f6410..1460a0611d32d01891b164aa7209e38b337c9752 100755 --- a/client/imagebuild.py +++ b/client/imagebuild.py @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ def main(): type='choice', choices=['boot','dvd','live']) parser.add_option('-w', '--workdir', help='Work directory for the image builder.', - dest='workdir', default=tempfile.gettempdir()+'/imagebuilder_work') + dest='workdir', default='/var/tmp/imagebuilder_work') parser.add_option('-s', '--staging', help='Staging area (file:/// or ftp://)', dest='staging', default='file:///'+os.getcwd()) #parser.add_option('-e', '--email', help='Email address for notification', dest='email') @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ def main(): parser.print_help() sys.exit() + #TODO: write some warning if workdir is /tmp (in F18 and above) + #check for config file path. if not os.path.exists(opts.config): sys.exit('Config file is non-existent') diff --git a/conf/dvd_imagebuild.conf b/conf/dvd_imagebuild.conf index 22ff578f5b9bb0cf5d2b11f0d8b2b93a6afb6993..89793343edc31bf942e0bc7cc95f76337228aa6a 100644 --- a/conf/dvd_imagebuild.conf +++ b/conf/dvd_imagebuild.conf @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ config=file:///usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-install-fedora.ks # sourceisos=0 # force=1 # stage=all (default) -# destdir=/tmp/dvd_iso -# cachedir=/tmp/dvd_iso/cache +# destdir=/var/tmp/dvd_iso +# cachedir=/var/tmp/dvd_iso/cache # Additional packages to retrieve from Koji # Seperated by semicolons; diff --git a/conf/live_imagebuild.conf b/conf/live_imagebuild.conf index 551d71ef9828ab7d961eb1e1e32cb1cf6a2f45e9..a5ff4877e12c3e0ebb62e915610ce860c8bf190f 100644 --- a/conf/live_imagebuild.conf +++ b/conf/live_imagebuild.conf @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ config=http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-liv… # releasever=rawhide # nvr= # bid= -# tmpdir=/tmp/livework +# tmpdir=/var/tmp/livework # cachedir=/var/cache/liveimage -# logfile=/tmp/liveimage.log +# logfile=/var/tmp/liveimage.log # Additional packages to retrieve from Koji # Seperated by semicolons;

2 1

Mailing List Change Proposal
by Tim Flink 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

There was discussion about where qa development related emails should go and whether we should create a new qa-devel list for qa tools discussion or just use autoqa-devel@. Instead of doing either of those, I propose that we depreciate the autoqa-devel@ list and move everything related to qa development (autoqa, blocker tracking app, any other tools) to a new qa-devel@ list. It keeps development discussion off of test@ and doesn't create another mailing list for people to keep track of since many of us are involved in more than one area of qa devel. Thoughts? Tim

3 6

[Fedora Build Service] Why we are developing in develop branch?
by Petr Schindler 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Hi, I'd like to ask, is there any reason for developing in develop branch? I'm not sure what the right git work flow is, but Kamil was wondering why we do this. My experience is that I tried master firstly and I came to develop after Tim told me about it. Wouldn't be better to develop in master branch? Thank you Petr Schindler

5 4

[fedora-build-service] #9: default templates use /tmp
by fedora-badges 27 Feb '13

27 Feb '13

#9: default templates use /tmp ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Initial Deployment Component: Image Building | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- The templates currently in git specify /tmp as working directories for lorax and pungi. This is fine for F17 and earlier, but with tmpfs in F18, this can cause problems because /tmp isn't a real filesystem. This is a simple fix - just substitute /var/tmp for /tmp in the templates. It might be worth a warning if someone tries to use /tmp as a work directory but I really don't think that's necessary at this time. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-build-service/ticket/9> fedora-build-service <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-build-service> A service to build fedora images with a somewhat arbitrary package set from the standard fedora repos or builds from koji.

1 1

Review Request 8: Add Fedora 19 Milestones
by Martin Krizek 27 Feb '13

27 Feb '13

1 2

Fedora Gooey Karma
by Tomas Meszaros 25 Feb '13

25 Feb '13

I was told by Kamil Paral that autoqa-devel is the right place for devel stuff related to the Fedora QA. I announced at the test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org that I'm working on the Fedora Gooey Karma: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-February/113879.html Currently, the code is at the Github: https://github.com/examon/fedora-gooey-karma It's already functional so you can test it. Please notice that I'm new to the Fedora QA so give me some feedback, request features, etc. If you would like to participate in any way, I'm at the #fedora-qa under the nickname examon/exo. Feel free to send me patches, join me at github, comment, IM me via IRC, e-mail. -- Tomas Meszaros

2 3

Re: Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code
by Martin Krizek 25 Feb '13

25 Feb '13

----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/#review6 ----------------------------------------------------------- blockerbugs/config.py <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/#comment5> Why is this commented out? blockerbugs/controllers/main.py <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/#comment6> And why is this commented out? :) blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/#comment7> The url could be loaded from the config, right? blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py <http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/#comment8> Just curious, why is this not loaded in the constructor? - Martin Krizek On Feb. 7, 2013, 9:01 p.m., Tim Flink wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Review request for blockerbugs. > > > Bugs: 334 > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/334 > > > Repository: blockerbugs > > > Description > ------- > > Initial code for blocker submission page > > > Diffs > ----- > > testing/test_bugchange.py PRE-CREATION > init_f18db.sh c20df66c4b4a8f38ab79a1b61043d26de112f71c > init_db.sh PRE-CREATION > blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py 2bae79db2d3a1206b7de1cee5f005f137ba2d6f3 > blockerbugs/templates/thanks.html PRE-CREATION > blockerbugs/templates/propose_bug.html PRE-CREATION > blockerbugs/templates/base_nav.html f3a89798a9dadf297e722c067ad3795a72ebbf74 > blockerbugs/controllers/main.py e7525f8433d74802f7c0cb2d719f0abdc13431c4 > blockerbugs/controllers/forms.py 669d78a5030904d4559d6d68af093bd6f096888b > blockerbugs/config.py 009e7a97f57e31fcc499dba87fe7d33e41252a2c > blockerbugs/__init__.py ad051ca2523aa70ca2d4d26843e9a2bdf0b5cd00 > > Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/2/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Tim Flink > >

1 2

Review Request 2: Initial Blocker Review Code
by Martin Krizek 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

1 0

Review Request 6: Fixing sync to work with new python-bugzilla and new FE naming convention
by Martin Krizek 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/6/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: 331 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/331 Repository: blockerbugs Description ------- Refactoring templates, bug sync and database to fit with new FreezeException nomenclature adding alembic upgrade script for db changes updated bug_sync code for python-bugzilla >= 0.8 Diffs ----- testing/testfunc_bugsync.py 719b530187a5e3fff7aba72c6776eecaad32cc40 testing/test_bugsync_extract_information.py 47df0e7cd34406aafb7c27f35944d6cff8cb96f3 setup.py e9fc12082a4d16afe93b04d7b96658715403eccc blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py 2bae79db2d3a1206b7de1cee5f005f137ba2d6f3 blockerbugs/util/bug_sync.py a85200dae03630d9407d7b27e235eb13c4a5b4a1 blockerbugs/templates/milestone_stats.html 8ff6bc4470967d7eaef633ef8b9b98330eac198b blockerbugs/templates/milestone_info.html 167dc0b1f5778c75f00e667240d03e8bf817e87a blockerbugs/templates/irc_format.txt a931c077f88cc998e9464b520a5625d7d9cc7e73 blockerbugs/templates/blocker_list.html 79a8a4b008319e80763f66de3ed6e56df89aa6d8 blockerbugs/templates/admin/modify_release.html 548c3d90c95bfe2a90d5d399d020b7bfcbcffc90 blockerbugs/templates/admin/main.html 121e79f4aa4330cc7b364f835ff2fd61178ac842 blockerbugs/templates/admin/add_release.html d396629f5f30787bbf136c163d24f272371cf06f blockerbugs/models/milestone.py cad913446157a15079a519fe0c29831b1635dc1f blockerbugs/models/bug.py dc25f060c470c0ad168e88c981ffe82203ca0d93 blockerbugs/controllers/main.py e7525f8433d74802f7c0cb2d719f0abdc13431c4 blockerbugs/controllers/forms.py 669d78a5030904d4559d6d68af093bd6f096888b blockerbugs/controllers/admin.py a6c8674820d602577363959be7d4eecd608cdf12 alembic/versions/487cb8ccce92_dropping_flask_login.py PRE-CREATION alembic/versions/31a6a2f222b7_changing_nth_and_tra.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/6/diff/ Testing ------- I've done several syncs on both sqlite and postgres dbs and clicked around to make sure that all the templates that _were_ working are still working. Some of the admin pages still have issues but that is orthogonal to the changes here. I did an alembic upgrade of the database with no issues. Thanks, Tim Flink

1 7

[AutoQA] #435: Update repoinfo.conf - Remove release
by fedora-badges 14 Feb '13

14 Feb '13

#435: Update repoinfo.conf - Remove release -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: ausil | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Hot issues Component: production | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -------------------------+------------------------ Fedora 16 is now EOL -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/435> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

autoqa-devel February 2013