autoqa-devel August 2012

autoqa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

3 participants
20 discussions

[AutoQA] #417: Prune old autotest results [waiting upstream]
by fedora-badges 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

#417: Prune old autotest results [waiting upstream] -------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Packaging, Review, & Deployment Component: production | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Since we execute a large number of jobs, the database fills pretty quickly and the autotest interface gets slower and slower. Lucas implemented a new script to prune the database, but we have to wait until it is released in a new autotest-server version (probably 0.14). https://github.com/autotest/autotest/issues/98 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/417> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 2

[AutoQA] #251: Move autotest applications into /usr/*bin
by fedora-badges 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

#251: Move autotest applications into /usr/*bin -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Packaging, Review, & Deployment Component: packaging | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- The autotest package should supply binaries in /usr/bin/ ... so we can rely on PATH and not have to call autotest with the full-path (/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/autotest) when scheduling jobs in '/usr/bin/autoqa'. Alternatively, the autotest package could drop a script that updates PATH appropriately into /etc/profile.d/autotest. But yuck. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/251> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 2

[AutoQA] #419: Adjust code to Autotest API changes
by fedora-badges 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

#419: Adjust code to Autotest API changes -----------------------+-------------------------- Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: mkrizek Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Future tasks Component: autotest | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+-------------------------- With recent proposed changes to Autotest API [1], the job here is to make appropriate adjustments to AutoQA code and make sure that everything works after that. [1] http://test.kernel.org/pipermail/autotest/2012-April/010235.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/419> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 1

[AutoQA] #191: Submit autotest for Fedora package approval
by fedora-badges 26 Sep '12

26 Sep '12

#191: Submit autotest for Fedora package approval -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Packaging and Review Component: packaging | Version: 1.0 Keywords: | -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522 Currently stalled, pending packaging of the gwt package. This includes packaging all bundled .jar files included with gwt. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/191> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 3

Potential issue with depcheck on F18
by Tim Flink 30 Aug '12

30 Aug '12

I just filed a bug against yum that is causing problems with pungi because pungi creates yum repos without configuration files. Since depcheck does almost the same thing, we may want to keep an eye on the resolution of this bug - if the root issue isn't fixed, we may have to patch depcheck. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852961 Tim

1 0

[AutoQA] #432: Submit python-resultsdb for Fedora package approval
by fedora-badges 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

#432: Submit python-resultsdb for Fedora package approval ------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: mkrizek Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Packaging, Review, & Deployment Component: packaging | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ------------------------+--------------------------------------------- -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/432> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 0

[AutoQA] #431: depcheck: installs wrong architecture for speed-dreams
by fedora-badges 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

#431: depcheck: installs wrong architecture for speed-dreams ---------------------+---------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Depcheck Component: tests | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ---------------------+---------------------- Depcheck reports broken i686 dependencies while checking x86_64 package. The dependencies are not broken, package can be installed. Read more: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-August/170962.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/431> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 0

rats_install and rats_sanity need a new maintainer
by Kamil Paral 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

Hongqing used to maintain rats_install and rats_sanity tests. Because he has left, we need to find a new maintainer or remove the tests. - rats_sanity has some minor scheduling issues, I'm working on it just now. Apart from that it shouldn't be a problematic test. - rats_install is currently broken, and we can start fixing it only after anaconda releases some new compose (with serial console install included). This is a problematic test and will probably require lots of maintenance (according to anaconda changes throughout the Branched period). Tao, do you feel like taking Hongqing's former responsibilities? Is there any other volunteer?

1 2

[AutoQA] #414: rats_install: run twice, once for updates, once for updates+updates-testing
by fedora-badges 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

#414: rats_install: run twice, once for updates, once for updates+updates-testing --------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Nice to have soon Component: tests | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+------------------------------- We decided it would be beneficial to run rats_install twice. Once for stable updates only, once for main+updates, once for main+updates+updates- testing. Currently we're running just the second option. The discussion is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120319#t15:55:42 Change rats_install to execute twice and report both variants. The easiest way is probably to modify 'control' file to execute the job twice and modify some input argument to distinguish the two cases. Also we need to change the summary accordingly so that we can easily distinguish that in our ResultsDB view. Marking "Nice to have soon" if we can do it before F17 Final, otherwise it'll probably go into "Future tasks". -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/414> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 10

[AutoQA] #430: depcheck: yum.Errors.RepoError: Can't download or revert repomd.xml
by fedora-badges 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

#430: depcheck: yum.Errors.RepoError: Can't download or revert repomd.xml ---------------------+------------------------ Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues Component: tests | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ---------------------+------------------------ We're getting quite a lot of these crashes lately: {{{ Traceback (most recent call last): File "./depcheck", line 112, in <module> profile=opts.profile) File "/usr/share/autotest/tests/depcheck/depcheck_lib.py", line 394, in depcheck_main test_dir=temp_dir, accepted_dir=acc_dir) File "/usr/share/autotest/tests/depcheck/depcheck_lib.py", line 293, in do_depcheck yum_repos.pkgSack # initializes package sacks File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 1013, in <lambda> pkgSack = property(fget=lambda self: self._getSacks(), File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 777, in _getSacks self.repos.populateSack(which=repos) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/repos.py", line 341, in populateSack sack.populate(repo, mdtype, callback, cacheonly) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 186, in populate if self._check_db_version(repo, mydbtype): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 294, in _check_db_version return repo._check_db_version(mdtype) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1358, in _check_db_version repoXML = self.repoXML File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1536, in <lambda> repoXML = property(fget=lambda self: self._getRepoXML(), File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1532, in _getRepoXML self._loadRepoXML(text=self) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1523, in _loadRepoXML return self._groupLoadRepoXML(text, self._mdpolicy2mdtypes()) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1497, in _groupLoadRepoXML if self._commonLoadRepoXML(text): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1332, in _commonLoadRepoXML self._revertOldRepoXML() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1168, in _revertOldRepoXML raise Errors.RepoError, "Can't download or revert repomd.xml" yum.Errors.RepoError: Can't download or revert repomd.xml }}} http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/414152-autotest/qa05.qa/depcheck/re… -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/430> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

autoqa-devel August 2012