On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 09:38 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > ----- "James Laska" <jlaska(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > See attached patch to convey the stand-alone idea noted above. > > Ok, I see your point now. Yes, we can do it like that. We will create > "stand-alone" script check_upgradepath.py, that will depend on autoqa > (therefore be able to use autoqa library and repoinfo.conf), but can > be run alone like: > > $ ./check_upgradepath.py --envrs blobby-0.9b-1.fc13 --kojitag dist-f13-updates > > I'm not sure how large the benefit is over calling it through the hook, > but surely the CLI interface is a little simpler than: > > $ autoqa post-bodhi-update --title blobby-0.9b-1.fc13 --target-tag dist-f13-updates blobby-0.9b-1.fc13 --local -t upgradepath You know, I completely forgot about this method of executing tests against --local. Sounds like I need to reacquaint myself with this approach. If running a test is just a matter of 1) yum install autoqa, 2) autoqa $hook --args ... that's not too bad. We already have the argument handling/parsing being done by autoqa and the hook. Apologies, I never thought of this method. Wwoods, what do you think?

..and since that was really the only objection to the patch, it's been applied to master. Thanks again, Vojta!