March 2014 - docs-qa - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 1021605] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021605 Bug ID: 1021605 Summary: No Default Syslog Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: brentrbrian(a)gmail.com, johannbg(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kvolny(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, yjcoshc(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co, zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Depends On: 967521, 998573 Blocks: 1001355, 1001356 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically, remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.) --- Additional comment from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on 2013-10-08 15:22:54 EDT --- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=2b8f6883a17b --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:44:57 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Matthew Miller on 2013-10-15 14:38:53 EDT --- The basic change to implement this went in, although quite a few packages still bring in rsyslogd as a dependency. I think this feature is fine as it is, and we'll detangle that as part of making separate, targeted Fedora products. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-16 06:56:42 EDT --- Ok, thanks, moving to ON_QA. --- Additional comment from Karel Volný on 2013-10-21 08:27:14 EDT --- just FTR, journal brings bug #967521 - how could we switch to this nonsense if that one is still unresolved? well, in fact, how could we even have this activated by default, maybe I'm just out of luck googling, but I see no approval for journal to be used? --- Additional comment from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson on 2013-10-21 08:59:21 EDT --- Just an FYI This feature is not as simple as no default syslog. We need to fix the entire syslog ( journal/rsyslog/syslog-ng ) implementation in the distribution, come up with virtual provide ( to sub package or not to sub package rsyslog/syslog-ng ) as well as fix roughly 600 packages. Now the proposal on how to do so has been stuck with FPC for 2 years now and until that has been done and fixed this feature can never be considered 100% complete... --- Additional comment from Matthew Miller on 2013-10-21 09:10:10 EDT --- (In reply to Jóhann B. Guðmundsson from comment #6) > Just an FYI This feature is not as simple as no default syslog. We need to > fix the entire syslog ( journal/rsyslog/syslog-ng ) implementation in the > distribution, come up with virtual provide ( to sub package or not to sub > package rsyslog/syslog-ng ) as well as fix roughly 600 packages. Now the > proposal on how to do so has been stuck with FPC for 2 years now and until > that has been done and fixed this feature can never be considered 100% > complete... I agree that that's the target, and also that it will continue to be slow-moving. This feature was intentionally meant to slice off and accomplish a small portion of that. --- Additional comment from Brent R Brian on 2013-10-21 09:42:27 EDT --- My comments are not intended to be a remedy, fix, enoursement of a fix/remedy or anything other than a "data point". If you guys need a "lab rat", let me know. B --- Additional comment from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson on 2013-10-21 11:10:22 EDT --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #7) > (In reply to Jóhann B. Guðmundsson from comment #6) > > Just an FYI This feature is not as simple as no default syslog. We need to > > fix the entire syslog ( journal/rsyslog/syslog-ng ) implementation in the > > distribution, come up with virtual provide ( to sub package or not to sub > > package rsyslog/syslog-ng ) as well as fix roughly 600 packages. Now the > > proposal on how to do so has been stuck with FPC for 2 years now and until > > that has been done and fixed this feature can never be considered 100% > > complete... > > I agree that that's the target, and also that it will continue to be > slow-moving. This feature was intentionally meant to slice off and > accomplish a small portion of that. That is one of the core problem people really as in that feature and related work are just implemented up to the point it serves the feature requester need ( and is labelled as 100% feature completed ) as opposed to the actual work required to implement properly into the distribution. What we need to do is to keep distribute wide changes as these in a separated branch and switch all the components at the same time when the feature actually is 100% feature complete Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967521 [Bug 967521] /var/log/journal breaks system startup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998573 [Bug 998573] No Default Syslog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001355 [Bug 1001355] No Default Syslog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001356 [Bug 1001356] No Default Syslog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1008207] New: FreeIPA OTP UI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008207 Bug ID: 1008207 Summary: FreeIPA OTP UI Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nathaniel(a)natemccallum.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, tbabej(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998526 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998526 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: FreeIPA OTP UI For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3OTPUI FreeIPA will gain a user interface for managing users' OTP tokens. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:24:59 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001200.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1008206] New: FreeIPA OTP UI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008206 Bug ID: 1008206 Summary: FreeIPA OTP UI Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nathaniel(a)natemccallum.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tbabej(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998526 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998526 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: FreeIPA OTP UI For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3OTPUI FreeIPA will gain a user interface for managing users' OTP tokens. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:24:59 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001200.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1008191] New: Apache OpenOffice
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008191 Bug ID: 1008191 Summary: Apache OpenOffice Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998511 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998511 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Apache OpenOffice For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/ApacheOpenOffice Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1008190] New: Apache OpenOffice
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008190 Bug ID: 1008190 Summary: Apache OpenOffice Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998511 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998511 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Apache OpenOffice For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/ApacheOpenOffice Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1021570] New: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021570 Bug ID: 1021570 Summary: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dlehman(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998527 Blocks: 998532, 1008211, 1008212 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998527 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/InstallerLVMThinProvisioningSupport LVM has introduced thin provisioning technology, which provides greatly improved snapshot functionality in addition to thin provisioning capability. This change will make it possible to configure thin provisioning during OS installation. --- Additional comment from David Lehman on 2013-08-27 11:28:33 EDT --- The only missing piece is a way to select a usage profile in anaconda. You specify metadata size and chunk size via kickstart. The bug to add profiles to lvm2 for common thinp usage patterns is bug 958464. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:45:46 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-21 10:13:43 EDT --- I see 958464 in POST state but probably without profiles. Is it acceptable to consider this Change completed without it or not? FESCo asked me to finish review of Changes this week. Thanks. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998527 [Bug 998527] OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998532 [Bug 998532] Snapshot and Rollback Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008211 [Bug 1008211] OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008212 [Bug 1008212] OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1008211] New: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008211 Bug ID: 1008211 Summary: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dlehman(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998527 Blocks: 998532 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998527 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/InstallerLVMThinProvisioningSupport LVM has introduced thin provisioning technology, which provides greatly improved snapshot functionality in addition to thin provisioning capability. This change will make it possible to configure thin provisioning during OS installation. --- Additional comment from David Lehman on 2013-08-27 11:28:33 EDT --- The only missing piece is a way to select a usage profile in anaconda. You specify metadata size and chunk size via kickstart. The bug to add profiles to lvm2 for common thinp usage patterns is bug 958464. -------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185803.html Please document this Change in the Release Notes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1008212] New: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '18

10 Aug '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008212 Bug ID: 1008212 Summary: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dlehman(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998527 Blocks: 998532 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998527 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/InstallerLVMThinProvisioningSupport LVM has introduced thin provisioning technology, which provides greatly improved snapshot functionality in addition to thin provisioning capability. This change will make it possible to configure thin provisioning during OS installation. --- Additional comment from David Lehman on 2013-08-27 11:28:33 EDT --- The only missing piece is a way to select a usage profile in anaconda. You specify metadata size and chunk size via kickstart. The bug to add profiles to lvm2 for common thinp usage patterns is bug 958464. -------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185803.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1080006] New: Incorrect command for multi-core power saving
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080006 Bug ID: 1080006 Summary: Incorrect command for multi-core power saving Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: fedorabugs(a)aylett.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In section 4.2 [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Power_Management_Guide/…], there's a list of commands that can be executed to save some power. The command listed for "enable multi-core power-saving (part of the laptop-battery-powersave profile)" is a duplicate of the previous command and is therefore incorrect. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.1-0 The command is given as: echo Y > /sys/module/snd_ac97_codec/parameters/power_save Which is the command for enabling audio codec power saving, not for enabling multi-core power saving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1036886] New: Incorrect command to start tuned at boot in Power Management Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036886 Bug ID: 1036886 Summary: Incorrect command to start tuned at boot in Power Management Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: stevenhrosenberg(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: On this page -- http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Power_Management_Guide/s… -- the command to start the tuned utility at boot has two words transposed: Specifically right here -- http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Power_Management_Guide/s…: How it reads: To enable tuned to start every time the machine boots, type the following command: systemctl tuned enable But it should be: To enable tuned to start every time the machine boots, type the following command: systemctl enable tuned As you can see, the last two words of the command need to be transposed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1008872] New: CPUfreq documentation for F19 lacks information on the new intel_pstate driver and its governors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008872 Bug ID: 1008872 Summary: CPUfreq documentation for F19 lacks information on the new intel_pstate driver and its governors Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: mail2benny(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Power_Management_Guide/… only documents governors for the acpi-cpufreq driver but not for the new intel_pstate driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 994167] New: typo in servicectl enable command
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994167 Bug ID: 994167 Summary: typo in servicectl enable command Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: joseignacio.quintana(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com Description of problem: >>> F19, power-management-guide, Section: 2.5.3. Installation and Usage >>> command "systemctl tuned enable" should be "systemctl enable tuned" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): >>> F19 doc of power management guide How reproducible: # systemctl tuned enable # ERR: Unknown operation 'tuned'. # systemctl enable tuned # OK: ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/tuned.service' '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/tuned.service' Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 973950] New: Type in Chapter 1.2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973950 Bug ID: 973950 Summary: Type in Chapter 1.2 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Reporter: swierckx(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, r.landmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In chapter 1.2 of the power management guide there is a type in the fedora version mentioned "The kernel used in releases of Fedora prior to Fedora 8 used a periodic timer for each CPU. This timer prevents the CPU from truly going idle ..." should probably be ""The kernel used in releases of Fedora prior to Fedora 18 used a periodic timer for each CPU. This timer prevents the CPU from truly going idle ..."" I deducted this from the sentence a little further where it is mentioned that only from Fedora 18 the idle CPU state is tickles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 842190] New: Cpufreq governor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842190 Bug ID: 842190 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Cpufreq governor Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: h479627(a)rtrtr.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 832179] New: Power management guide is wrong for frequency scaling in Fedora 17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832179 Bug ID: 832179 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Power management guide is wrong for frequency scaling in Fedora 17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jnm11(a)cam.ac.uk Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Power management guide is wrong https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Power_Management_Guide/… Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 the location of the cpufreq directory is misspecified it is /lib/modules/3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64/kernel/drivers/cpufreq There are no modules acpi-cpufreq or p4-clockmod available is acpi-cpufreq directly compiled in. the cpuspeed package is mentioned for the userspace governor but no package exists in fedora 17. I have been completely unable to figure out the following use case. My laptop overheats and powers off if the cpu load is high for too long. There should be a cpu governor or userspace daemon that reduces frequency when the temperature gets too high. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 915751] New: Remove BuildArch: noarch from the meta package example
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915751 Bug ID: 915751 Summary: Remove BuildArch: noarch from the meta package example Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: software-collections-guide Severity: high Priority: high Reporter: pkovar(a)redhat.com Remove BuildArch: noarch from the meta package example in: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html… (Changed in scl-utils-20121110.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 769438] New: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769438 Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: rpm-guide AssignedTo: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 548940 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=548940 Patch to Rpm Guide to fix rpm-guide-programming-python.xml Unfortunately the examples of Python code within the RPM guide have been thoroughly broken since the initial conversion to DocBook, due to the way Python treats leading whitespace as significant. I'm attaching a patch which overhauls this page, so that the code examples are syntactically valid. See the notes in the patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1025475] New: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025475 Bug ID: 1025475 Summary: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: admin(a)velusuniverse.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: calligra-kexi-driver-mysql summary says mysqwl driver for kexi but shouldnt it say mysql driver for kexi ?? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: use the yum extender andd look up calligra-kexi-driver-mysql Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: ummary says mysqwl driver for kexi Expected results: mysql driver for kexi Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1017792] New: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017792 Bug ID: 1017792 Summary: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In the "Verifying the %files section" chapter of the RPM guide [1], there is written "symlink", but it seems RPM uses "link" instead. Also I had trouble with the "maj" and "min", I guess there is "rdev" used instead. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. See the "Verifying the %files section" chapter Actual results: There are symlink, maj and min Expected results: The link and probably rdev Additional info: [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1003962] New: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003962 Bug ID: 1003962 Summary: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: daniel.neuberger(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The fedora RPM guide does not document the -p option that can be passed to the RPM scriptlets. It should probably be located here http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…, but I looked through the entire guide and couldn't find it. The only only place I could find it documented is here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets, but what it says is wrong. It says: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which allows the scriptlet to invoke a single program directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs. (ie: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig)" A more accurate description is: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which specifies the interPreter that should be used to run the script (the default is /bin/sh). Sometimes the -p option is used with no body in order to run a single command directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs (i.e. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig). Note that this form requires that there be nothing but white space (not even comments) until the next section begins." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1057882] New: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057882 Bug ID: 1057882 Summary: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an updated Czech version of the F20 Installation Quick Start Guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Mostly grammar errors found in current version. Expected results: An updated Czech translation published - missing translation(s) added, translation revision and precision. Additional info: If the bug BZ#1056196 is a serious obstacle, publish this update once the bug is resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1050903] New: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050903 Bug ID: 1050903 Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an update of the Czech translation of Burning ISO images to disc guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Translation update - missing translation, revision and precision. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 985020] New: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985020 Bug ID: 985020 Summary: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: bvoperdf21(a)mt2014.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Description of problem: First I'd like to thank for the awesome documentaions available. Also +1 for the export function (PDF,html-single,...). Looking at the packagers guide I missed some information. It would be nice if you also tell what kind of rpm packages are out there. What I found so far: .rpm .src.rpm .debugsource.... .debuginfo.... For example I still don't know if the debugsource is needed when using gdb for debugging or if the debuginfo package is enough. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Edition 18.0.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Pac… 2.read everything Actual results: no description of the defferent types of rpm packages Expected results: find description of the defferent types of rpm packages and what they are used for/by. Additional info: would be nice to have this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 959626] New: config_name mismatch in mock example
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959626 Bug ID: 959626 Summary: config_name mismatch in mock example Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: axilleas(a)archlinux.gr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fnadge(a)redhat.com Category: --- Description of problem: In section 2.4.3. Testing a Package with Mock, the last example uses the epel-6-x86_64 config whereas Fedora 18 is referenced above. According to the preamble, the example should read: mock -r fedora-18-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eject-2.1.5-0.1.fc18.src.rpm Link: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Pa… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1008227] New: SSD cache
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008227 Bug ID: 1008227 Summary: SSD cache Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: agk(a)redhat.com, i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com, jeremy(a)goop.org, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kzak(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, rolf(a)rolffokkens.nl, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998543, 999690, 1000817, 1001120, 1003208, 1000078, 1003207 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998543 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: SSD cache For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SSD_cache Using recent kernel (3.9 and later) features for (fast) SSD caching of (slow) ordinary hard disks. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-21 13:35:33 EDT --- I'll build a bcache-tools RPM and a dm-cache-utils rpm (actually bcache-tools is already available here: bcache-tools-20130820-0.1.fc19.src.rpm). I'll follow the procedure as described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-24 11:51:34 EDT --- Tried to create a dmcache-utils package as well (Bug 1000078) but it doesn't look really useful. So I'll focus on bcache-tools first. For that I still need a sponsor. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-27 06:52:40 EDT --- I closed Bug 1000078 since good userland support requires LVM2 to support dm-cache. Which will happen 'in the future', but F20 doesn't look feasible to me. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:21:30 EDT --- Create Bug 1003207 (bcache support for dracut) which is not blocking for F20, but probably will be blocking for F21. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:25:06 EDT --- Create Bug 1003208 (bcache support for anaconda) which is not blocking for F20, but probably will be blocking for F21. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-09-09 04:18:18 EDT --- Test day planned: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/415 -------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185336.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1058066] New: new virt-xml functionality coming from upstream libvirt should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058066 Bug ID: 1058066 Summary: new virt-xml functionality coming from upstream libvirt should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com There is a new tool called `virt-xml` that will end up in Fedora soon[1]. It looks very useful, and should be documented. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-January/msg01226.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 980931] New: The Virtualization Administration Guide Still Uses UNIX System V Commands
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980931 Bug ID: 980931 Summary: The Virtualization Administration Guide Still Uses UNIX System V Commands Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Keywords: Documentation Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: jhradile(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com, me(a)petetravis.com Description of problem: The Virtualization Administration Guide for Fedora 18 [1] still uses UNIX System V commands “service” and “chkconfig”. Although these commands still work and will continue to work in the foreseeable future, users are strongly advised to learn and use the new command that is shipped with systemd and is part of the Fedora distribution since version 15. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora-Virtualization_Administration_Guide-18-en-US-1.0-1 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: Read section 14.3, “Starting and stopping the daemon” [2], to learn how to configure the vhostmd service to start automatically at boot time. Actual results: /sbin/chkconfig vhostmd on Expected results: systemctl enable vhostmd.service Additional info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet ----- [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/Virtualization_Ad… [2] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/Virtualization_Ad… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 982899] New: 7.3.1. Establishing a Wired (Ethernet) Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '17

11 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982899 Bug ID: 982899 Summary: 7.3.1. Establishing a Wired (Ethernet) Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 7.3.1: Default connection no longer called 'em1' No field for 'connection name' you can add new settings for the network under different profiles by selecting 'add profile...' you can remove/reset a profile by going to the 'options' button under the profile and selecting the 'reset' item on the left, and then choosing to either 'reset' or 'forget' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1001344] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001344 Bug ID: 1001344 Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, vgoyal(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998565 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines. --- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT --- I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not sure how to do it. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT --- (In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1) > I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am > not sure how to do it. Vivek, create Package Review - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps. Thank you. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001343] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001343 Bug ID: 1001343 Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, vgoyal(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998565 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines. --- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT --- I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not sure how to do it. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT --- (In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1) > I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am > not sure how to do it. Vivek, create Package Review - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps. Thank you. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 977042] New: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '16

15 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977042 Bug ID: 977042 Summary: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com The System Administrator's Guide references a number of GUI utilities, many of which are specific to GNOME. It isn't immediately obvious to the uninitiated that this is the case, causing non-GNOME users to find fault with the guide. I suggest an admonition in the preface along the lines of "Some of the graphical procedures and menu locations are specific to GNOME, but most command line instructions will be universally applicable" Comprehensively differentiating between GNOME procedures, procedures for other DEs, and universal procedures would probably be prohibitively time consuming. --Pete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 997219] New: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '16

15 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219 Bug ID: 997219 Summary: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Assignee: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Reporter: sirjake(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Guide says that you can right click on a ISO image and choose "Write to disc." This is not true, at least with Fedora 19. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 19 How reproducible: Always, at least in 32 bit. Steps to Reproduce: 1. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Burning_ISO_images_to_di… 2. Insert a DVD. 3. Attempt to follow the directions above. No "Write to disk" option exists. Actual results: No obvious way to burn ISO images in Fedora Linux 19. Expected results: Directions to burn ISO disk in Fedora Linux 19 Additional info: I had a new-to-me computer that I assumed would not support 64 bit, but after installing 32 bit found out that 64 was supported by my processor. I downloaded 64 ( Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-1.iso ), and wanted to burn a disk of it, but the option was not available and the directions online did not help. I had to go back to Windows on a different machine to burn it. Note: I do have a DVD burner on this machine. The same thing occurs with CD's in the burner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 948823] New: Need a search solution for docs.fedoraproject.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jun '16

10 Jun '16

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948823 Bug ID: 948823 Summary: Need a search solution for docs.fedoraproject.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: project-tracking Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Category: --- Description of problem: Due to the removal of Google search feature (see bug 616876) we no longer have a search solution for docs.fp.o. We need to investigate an alternate solution and bring the search feature back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1002573] New: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002573 Bug ID: 1002573 Summary: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, me(a)petetravis.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, steved(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 984718, 998566, 1001346 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1001346 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998566 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS The Linux Kernel has grown support for passing SELinux labels between a client and server using NFS. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001216.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982914] New: 7.4.1. Configuring 802.1x Security
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982914 Bug ID: 982914 Summary: 7.4.1. Configuring 802.1x Security Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 7.4.1 under 'Procedure 7.8. For a wired connection...', ' Procedure 7.9. For a wireless connection...': The 'Network Connections' dialogue can be accessed via: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections, or via nm-connection-editor This is not specified at all in this section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982911] New: 7.3.3. Establishing a Mobile Broadband Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982911 Bug ID: 982911 Summary: 7.3.3. Establishing a Mobile Broadband Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Under section 7.3.3, in 'Procedure 7.3. Adding a New Mobile Broadband Connection', 'Procedure 7.4. Editing an Existing Mobile Broadband Connection': network connection editor can also be found at: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 982910] New: 7.3.5. Establishing a DSL Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982910 Bug ID: 982910 Summary: 7.3.5. Establishing a DSL Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 7.3.5 under 'Procedure 7.6. Adding a New DSL Connection', 'Procedure 7.7. Editing an Existing DSL Connection': These procedures could also specify that the network connections editor can be accessed from: activities --> applications --> Sundry --> Network Connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1003065] New: images missing from document
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003065 Bug ID: 1003065 Summary: images missing from document Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: mordred(a)warpmail.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: in document: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administra… missing following 5 images under: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administra… images/authconfig-ui.png images/authconfig-local.png images/authconfig_LDAP.png images/authconfig_nis.png images/authconfig_winbind.png Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): n/a How reproducible: n/a Steps to Reproduce: n/a Actual results: Expected results: n/a Additional info: n/a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987309] New: Section 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 screenshot requires updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987309 Bug ID: 987309 Summary: Section 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 screenshot requires updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777226 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777226&action=edit advanced options F19 Description of problem: Screenshot in 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 needs updating -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987307] New: Section 11.1.2.4 Figure 11.2 requires updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987307 Bug ID: 987307 Summary: Section 11.1.2.4 Figure 11.2 requires updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777222 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777222&action=edit layout of ldap/kerberos options in authentication dialog Description of problem: Figure 11.2 in section 11.1.2.4 no longer looks like this as there is a third 'password options tab' on this dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 987301] New: Section 11.1.1 Figure 11.1 missing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987301 Bug ID: 987301 Summary: Section 11.1.1 Figure 11.1 missing Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 11.1.1 has a missing screenshot (Figure 11.1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 983366] New: Cover Page says "Fedora 17" in 'header' logo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983366 Bug ID: 983366 Summary: Cover Page says "Fedora 17" in 'header' logo Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Header logo on cover page of System Administrators guide says "Fedora 17" above first line of text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982894] New: 7.2.4. User and System Connections
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982894 Bug ID: 982894 Summary: 7.2.4. User and System Connections Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: the network settings dialogue does not have tabs, instead, the identity section of the dialogue is concerned with setting the connection to be available to all users (or not) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982510] New: 4.3. Using the User Manager Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982510 Bug ID: 982510 Summary: 4.3. Using the User Manager Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 4.3, the location of the user manager tool has changed in Gnome 3.8.3: Activities --> Applications --> Sundry --> Users and Groups -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982504] New: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982504 Bug ID: 982504 Summary: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: section 4.2 Using the User Accounts Tool related to bug 982500 location of the settings dialog is: activities --> applications --> utilities --> settings Further: The 'User Accounts' tool is called 'Users' in Gnome 3.8.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982444] New: 1.1 - region and language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982444 Bug ID: 982444 Summary: 1.1 - region and language Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Sys admin guide information regarding region and language doesn't specify which desktop environment is assumed to find the region and language. Also to find region and language in KDE, you click on the applications launcher, go to applications --> settings --> system settings, but it's also set as a favourite by default in F19 so can be found under favourites. Also in KDE, under system settings, the 'region and language' settings are under 'locale', 'country/region and language'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982500] New: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982500 Bug ID: 982500 Summary: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Gnome settings menu location has changed in 3.8.3: Activities --> Applications --> Utilities --> Settings This is not reflected in section 2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1018500] New: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '16

06 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018500 Bug ID: 1018500 Summary: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: storage-administration-guide Assignee: ddomingo(a)redhat.com Reporter: david.jones74(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: There's no section in the documentation for current Fedora versions, about how to configure NFS. There's SAMBA and FTP, but no NFS. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Search or browse documentation. 2. 3. Actual results: Can find scattered information about configuring NFS, but no consolidated section. Expected results: Section for configuring NFS clients and servers. Additional info: There are many changes in NFS configuration since Fedora 14. There's a different init system with different service names, There's also a new firewall manager. I'm just guess at a lot of the details, and it's pretty frustrating. Why does SAMBA have a large detailed section, and NFS has nothing? This is Linux, right? Is the Fedora Project moving to SAMBA as the preferred file sharing method? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 990252] New: incomplete index for Virtualization Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990252 Bug ID: 990252 Summary: incomplete index for Virtualization Administration Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: stephent98(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The index for the Virtualization Administration Guide has only three entries. Specifically, I was trying to find information on host memory requirements. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administr… How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1068889] New: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068889 Bug ID: 1068889 Summary: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: sclark(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 866496 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=866496&action=edit The attached archive contains patches to implement this change Following instructions in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs remove the version number from the directory name for all references to any package documentation directory in /usr/share/doc , leaving just the package's name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1008149] New: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Nov '15

06 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008149 Bug ID: 1008149 Summary: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: jrodrigosm(a)yahoo.es QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, In the Fedora 19 "Virtualization Getting Started Guide", section 2.2 ("What is migration?"), URL http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Virtualization_Getting_S… In the paragraph right before the 2.2.1 title, it is stated that "In Fedora 19, shared storage is not necessary for storing guest images to be migrated. With live storage migration [...]". But in the last paragraph of the page, right before the note, it is stated that "Shared, networked storage must be used for storing guest images to be migrated. Without shared storage, migration is not possible." These two statements seem contradictory to me. I just started learning about virtualization, so I am unable to propose an alternative. But I do think some clarification is needed. Thanks, Rodrigo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982906] New: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982906 Bug ID: 982906 Summary: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 7.3.2 under the heading: 'Saving Your New (or Modified) Connection and Making Further Configurations' it states: "You can further configure an existing connection by selecting it in the Network Connections window and clicking Edit to return to the Editing dialog." This could be clarified by stating that network connections can be found under: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Sep '15

28 Sep '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158 Bug ID: 979158 Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-guide Severity: high Priority: unspecified Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot adding scsi drive Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012 Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: using the previose version 1-52 works fine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '15

21 Jul '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762 Bug ID: 999762 Summary: Java FAQ Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: 1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009 2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during install and recommends against use of OpenJDK. 3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java. The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001342] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '15

30 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001342 Bug ID: 1001342 Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, pmachata(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883, 991919, 998564 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154 This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20. --- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT --- Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1) > Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two > weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, > iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?). Thanks. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1001341] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '15

30 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001341 Bug ID: 1001341 Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pmachata(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883, 991919, 998564 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154 This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20. --- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT --- Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1) > Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two > weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, > iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?). Thanks. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1001346] New: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '15

30 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001346 Bug ID: 1001346 Summary: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, steved(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 984718, 998566 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998566 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS The Linux Kernel has grown support for passing SELinux labels between a client and server using NFS. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001216.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001345] New: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '15

30 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001345 Bug ID: 1001345 Summary: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, steved(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 984718, 998566 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998566 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS The Linux Kernel has grown support for passing SELinux labels between a client and server using NFS. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001216.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1008221] New: Ryu Network Operating System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008221 Bug ID: 1008221 Summary: Ryu Network Operating System Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, ymht.fedora(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998540 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998540 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Ryu Network Operating System For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Ryu Ryu Network Operating System http://osrg.github.com/ryu/ ------------------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184930.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008220] New: Ryu Network Operating System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008220 Bug ID: 1008220 Summary: Ryu Network Operating System Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, ymht.fedora(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998540 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998540 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Ryu Network Operating System For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Ryu Ryu Network Operating System http://osrg.github.com/ryu/ ----------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184930.html Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 989059] New: PDF file content has been located at right half of page.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989059 Bug ID: 989059 Summary: PDF file content has been located at right half of page. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: dmitry_orekhov(a)mail.ru QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: All content has been located at right half of page. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Virtualization_Getting_St… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Virtualization_Security_G… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/pdf/Virtualization_Administra… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/pdf/Virtualization_Getting_St… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/pdf/Virtualization_Security_G… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 846864] New: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '15

18 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846864 Bug ID: 846864 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: laine(a)redhat.com Summary: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: laine(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Product: Fedora Documentation The Getting Started Guide needs an overview of all the different toolsets, and when each would be appropriate. In particular I'm talking about the following: 1) gnome-boxes 2) virt-manager 3) virsh, virt-install 4) ovirt 5) Should we point some people to OpenStack? I will write up a first draft of this, and hand it to a qualified docs person to edit and correctly place in the guide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 846184] New: New Russian translation for Fedora Resource Management Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '15

28 May '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846184 Bug ID: 846184 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Summary: New Russian translation for Fedora Resource Management Guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: brezhnev(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: resource-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Created attachment 602635 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=602635&action=edit Russian translation of Fedora 17 Resource Management Guide The patch providing Russian translation of the guide is attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 829952] New: Outdated information about cgconfig service in Resource Management Guide for Fedora 17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '15

28 May '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829952 Bug ID: 829952 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Summary: Outdated information about cgconfig service in Resource Management Guide for Fedora 17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: brezhnev(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: resource-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: The Resource Management Guide for Fedora 17 contains outdated information about cgconfig service in section 2.1 "The cgconfig Service" The guide states that the cgconfig service is not started by default in Fedora 17. It is not true. In addition, the guide contains phrase "When you start the service with chkconfig" that is wrong for any release. For Fedora 17 is should be "When you start the service with the <command>systemctl start</command> command". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1018053] New: New nmcli features should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Apr '15

13 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018053 Bug ID: 1018053 Summary: New nmcli features should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com nmcli in Fedora 20 can now add, delete, edit, activate, and deactivate connections, probably including bridge and Bond devices. This functionality should be represented in the SysadminGuide. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Networking/CLI is a start. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001349] New: NetworkManager Bridging Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001349 Bug ID: 1001349 Summary: NetworkManager Bridging Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, psimerda(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998568 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998568 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bridging Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBridging NetworkManager should be able to configure bridge interfaces with commonly used options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without disrupting their operation. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001352] New: NetworkManager Bridging Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001352 Bug ID: 1001352 Summary: NetworkManager Bridging Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, psimerda(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998568 Blocks: 1001349 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998568 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bridging Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBridging NetworkManager should be able to configure bridge interfaces with commonly used options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without disrupting their operation. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1005479] New: Need references for YUM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005479 Bug ID: 1005479 Summary: Need references for YUM Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: I noted the following Within http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-pk… In the Note Only one desktop environment can be selected at install time. To install additional environments once Fedora is installed, use the *Software* tool or the yum groupinstall| command. I do not recall a previous mention of yum in this guide. We who are familiar with Fedora know yum as the command line system software tool that accompanies Fedora. Perhaps we need to elaborate with a footnote, about yum and where to visit to fetch the yum documentation. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Refer to the link. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1060216] New: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060216 Bug ID: 1060216 Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: limburgher(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr) gpodder is being upgraded from 2.20.3 to 3.5.2. There is a configuration and date storage change between these versions. After upgrading the RPM, any user on the system who uses gpodder, prior to opening it, should run /usr/bin/gpodder-migrate2tres, which will migrate the user's data and configuration to the new format, including all subscribed feeds and downloaded podcasts. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083 [Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 928623] New: Need to explain HOW to try different desktop environments in live image
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928623 Bug ID: 928623 Summary: Need to explain HOW to try different desktop environments in live image Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-live-image Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: mike(a)thosehallidays.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nathan(a)afternoondust.co.uk, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Chapter 6 says "You can use the live image to try different desktop environments such as GNOME, KDE, Xfce, or others" but does not explain HOW to do that (or provide a contextual reference). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 18 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1050197] New: Deployment Guide misspells yum's --disableplugin option
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050197 Bug ID: 1050197 Summary: Deployment Guide misspells yum's --disableplugin option Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: deployment-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: scottt.tw(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dhensley(a)redhat.com, jhradile(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Deployment_Guide/sec-Yum… The "Enabling, Configuring and Disabling Yum Plugins" section of the Deployment Guide incorrectly mentions a "--disableplugins" yum option. The correct option name is "--disableplugin", i.e. without the extra "s" at the end. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982908] New: 7.3.4. Establishing a VPN Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982908 Bug ID: 982908 Summary: 7.3.4. Establishing a VPN Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Under section 7.3.4, in 'Procedure 7.5. Adding a New VPN Connection': 3. There is no VPN menu entry, There is also no interface option if you select the plus sign, however if you click the plus sign and select VPN, and then set the type of VPN, you can begin configuring the connection. 4. There is no create button 5. After clicking the plus button you are asked to choose the protocol type 6. The 'add network connection' dialogue comes up with the identity section selected on the left side of the dialogue 1,2,3. The dialogue is different to what is shown in 'Figure 7.5. Editing the newly-created VPN connection 1.' Also the menu items do not correspond with the instructions in 1,2,3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 982819] New: 3.3.2. Installing chrony
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982819 Bug ID: 982819 Summary: 3.3.2. Installing chrony Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 3.3.2 states the default install location for 'chrony' (guessing chronyc here) is listed as /usr/local/sbin, actual install location for chronyc is /usr/bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 982821] New: 3.4.1.1. Configuring chrony to Connect and Disconnect
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982821 Bug ID: 982821 Summary: 3.4.1.1. Configuring chrony to Connect and Disconnect Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Location of chronyc is incorrect in the examples. Actual location is /usr/bin/chronyc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982818] New: 3.3.1. Checking if chrony is Installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982818 Bug ID: 982818 Summary: 3.3.1. Checking if chrony is Installed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 3.3.1 states the install location of chronyd is /usr/local/sbin. It is actually installed at /usr/sbin/chronyd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982485] New: 3.3.7 Manually Adjusting the System Clock
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982485 Bug ID: 982485 Summary: 3.3.7 Manually Adjusting the System Clock Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 3.3.7 - Manualy adjusting system clock 1) Manually spelt wrong in title 2) when typing the commands listed, I get the following: $ chrony chrony version 1.28-pre1 Copyright (C) 1997-2003, 2007, 2009-2012 Richard P. Curnow and others chrony comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU General Public License version 2 for details. chronyc> password password: (tried root password) 501 Not authorised --- Reply not authenticated chronyc> makestep 501 Not authorised After consulting the help file (e.g. chronyc> help) it states: password [<new-password>] : Set command authentication password So it seems the password option sets the command auth password, but then it should have set the password so this is confusing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 977045] New: Guide should document chronyd, not ntpd
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977045 Bug ID: 977045 Summary: Guide should document chronyd, not ntpd Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com As of F16, Fedora uses `chrony` (chronyd.service) as the default time daemon[1]. Chrony monitors and offsets local clock skew, making it superior for machines without a constant connection to an ntp server. It also effectively changes the system clock for even very large time changes, where ntpd would require manual adjustment. The System administrator's guide should be updated to reflect this. The following sections, and references to them, should be updated: 2.2.3, “Configuring the Network Time Protocol” D.1.14. /etc/sysconfig/ntpd --Pete [1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/release-notes.git/plain/en-US/System… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1008217] New: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008217 Bug ID: 1008217 Summary: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, psimerda(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, thaller(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998530 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998530 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerCLIAddConnection Support for adding new NetworkManager connections using the nmcli commandline tool. --- Additional comment from Thomas Haller on 2013-08-28 04:08:50 EDT --- I did some minor rephrasing on the Changes page. It should be ok as it is now. --------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186525.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001348] New: NetworkManager Bonding Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001348 Bug ID: 1001348 Summary: NetworkManager Bonding Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dcbw(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998567 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998567 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bonding Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBonding NetworkManager should be able to configure bond master interfaces with commonly used options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without disrupting their operation. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001214.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001354] New: No Default Sendmail
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001354 Bug ID: 1001354 Summary: No Default Sendmail Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998571 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998571 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Sendmail For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail No longer install an MTA by default. (Specifically let's remove sendmail from @core and @standard comps groups.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001365] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001365 Bug ID: 1001365 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001195.h… and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186623.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008215] New: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008215 Bug ID: 1008215 Summary: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dvratil(a)redhat.com, jgrulich(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kevin.kofler(a)chello.at, ltinkl(a)redhat.com, mbriza(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, than(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998528 (kde-4.11), 995167 (lokalize), 995226 (kde-dev-utils), 996067 (kcron), 996068 (ksystemlog), 996069 (kuser), 1005133 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998528 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/KDE411 Rebase to version 4.11 of: the KDE Plasma Workspaces including the Plasma Desktop and Netbook workspaces, the KDE Applications and the KDE Platform. --- Additional comment from Lukáš Tinkl on 2013-08-26 08:54:02 EDT --- KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 is in its final and fully testable state. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-27 11:11:30 EDT --- KDE team agreed to move to MODIFIED. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001178.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008202] New: Apache Hadoop 2.x
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008202 Bug ID: 1008202 Summary: Apache Hadoop 2.x Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, matt(a)redhat.com, mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998521, 1003034, 1005724, 985087 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998521 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Apache Hadoop 2.x For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Hadoop Provide native Apache Hadoop packages. ---------------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185026.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1001336] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001336 Bug ID: 1001336 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, rhughes(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186166.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001368] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001368 Bug ID: 1001368 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001187.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1008195] New: Enlightenment
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008195 Bug ID: 1008195 Summary: Enlightenment Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, metherid(a)gmail.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 954132 (Enlightenment-Tracker), 998517 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998517 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enlightenment For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Enlightenment Enlightenment 0.17 a new stable release has been released after 12 years or so of development. As many desktops are being landed on Fedora, Integrating Enlightenment in Fedora can not only enlarge the number of available desktops in Fedora, but also improve user experiences and give users another choice of Desktop Environment. --------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001210.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001362] New: Ruby on Rails 4.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001362 Bug ID: 1001362 Summary: Ruby on Rails 4.0 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, jstribny(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, vondruch(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998578 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998578 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Ruby on Rails 4.0 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_4.0 Ruby on Rails 4.0 is the latest version of well know web framework written in Ruby. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001189.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008185] New: ACPICA Tools Update
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008185 Bug ID: 1008185 Summary: ACPICA Tools Update Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ahs3(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, okrh(a)johnfreed.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998504 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998504 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: ACPICA Tools Update For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AcpicaTools For developers working with the ACPI subsystem, there are tools available from the reference implementation at http://www.acpica.org. These tools have been restructured over time and the current Fedora packages as a result contain either outdated versions or do not make available a complete set of tools. We propose an acpica-tools package that replaces both the existing iasl package and the the existing pmtools package in order to make all current tools available, and make it more straightforward in the future to keep them up-to-date. --- Additional comment from Al Stone on 2013-08-28 18:08:23 EDT --- Package has been uploaded into git and builds done for all architectures for f20. --- Additional comment from John Freed on 2013-09-09 04:02:26 EDT --- acpica-tools obsoletes pmtools, but it appears it should also obsolete iasl: Transaction check error: file /usr/bin/iasl from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64 file /usr/share/man/man1/iasl.1.gz from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64 Erasing iasl and installing acpica-tools works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1008186] New: ACPICA Tools Update
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008186 Bug ID: 1008186 Summary: ACPICA Tools Update Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ahs3(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, okrh(a)johnfreed.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998504 Blocks: 1008185 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998504 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: ACPICA Tools Update For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AcpicaTools For developers working with the ACPI subsystem, there are tools available from the reference implementation at http://www.acpica.org. These tools have been restructured over time and the current Fedora packages as a result contain either outdated versions or do not make available a complete set of tools. We propose an acpica-tools package that replaces both the existing iasl package and the the existing pmtools package in order to make all current tools available, and make it more straightforward in the future to keep them up-to-date. --- Additional comment from Al Stone on 2013-08-28 18:08:23 EDT --- Package has been uploaded into git and builds done for all architectures for f20. --- Additional comment from John Freed on 2013-09-09 04:02:26 EDT --- acpica-tools obsoletes pmtools, but it appears it should also obsolete iasl: Transaction check error: file /usr/bin/iasl from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64 file /usr/share/man/man1/iasl.1.gz from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64 Erasing iasl and installing acpica-tools works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001339] New: Migrate to Bluez 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001339 Bug ID: 1001339 Summary: Migrate to Bluez 5 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bnocera(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kalevlember(a)gmail.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998563 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998563 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Migrate to Bluez 5 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Bluez5 BlueZ is the Linux Bluetooth stack for managing wireless Bluetooth devices. In Fedora 20, we are going to switch from BlueZ version 4 to version 5. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-August/001227… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001377] New: Perl 5.18
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001377 Bug ID: 1001377 Summary: Perl 5.18 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998584 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998584 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Perl 5.18 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/perl5.18 A new perl 5.18 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of development. See 5.18.0 perldelta for more details. --- Additional comment from Jitka Plesnikova on 2013-08-23 04:40:10 EDT --- Perl has been updated and the most of packages was rebuilt. All packages, which was not built, are listed on the feature page. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:25:18 EDT --- (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1) > Perl has been updated and the most of packages was rebuilt. > All packages, which was not built, are listed on the feature page. Thank you, I'm changing bug state to MODIFIED now to reflect current Change state. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-June/001158.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008231] New: SSSD CIFS plugin
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008231 Bug ID: 1008231 Summary: SSSD CIFS plugin Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhrozek(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sbose(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998544 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998544 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: SSSD CIFS plugin For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SSSD_CIFS_plugin During the F20 development cycle, the SSSD will provide an ID-mapping plugin for cifs-utils so that Windows SIDs can be mapped onto POSIX IDs and/or names without requiring Winbind and using the same code as the SSSD uses for identity information. --- Additional comment from Sumit Bose on 2013-08-28 11:40:40 EDT --- The public interfaces for SID related queries are available and testable. The plugin for the cifs-utils is planned for the next SSSD release which is aligned with the Fedora 20 beta schedule. ---------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185376.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008200] New: GNOME 3.10
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008200 Bug ID: 1008200 Summary: GNOME 3.10 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998518 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998518 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: GNOME 3.10 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Gnome3.10 Update GNOME to the latest upstream release --- Additional comment from Matthias Clasen on 2013-08-23 10:44:03 EDT --- 3.9.90 is in f20 Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001192.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008219] New: Plasma-nm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008219 Bug ID: 1008219 Summary: Plasma-nm Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jgrulich(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, ltinkl(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998531 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998531 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Plasma-nm For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Plasma-nm Replace current network applet in KDE with a new one and bring the latest news in NetworkManager to KDE. --- Additional comment from Lukáš Tinkl on 2013-08-20 08:27:16 EDT --- This change is currently fully working and in testable state, using: $ yum install kde-plasma-nm ------------------------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185649.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008193] New: Developer Assistant GUI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008193 Bug ID: 1008193 Summary: Developer Assistant GUI Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bkabrda(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, phracek(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998501 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998501 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Developer Assistant GUI For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/DeveloperAssistantGUI The feature aims to provide GUI for devassistant package. --- Additional comment from Petr Hracek on 2013-08-23 03:53:55 EDT --- Main Developer Assistant GUI is finished and testable. Problem with aborting project creation was already solved. GUI for creation of user assistants depends on some devassistant-lint engine which is not implemented yet (will be in future). devassistant-lint program should check whether yaml assistant is correct and runnable by devassistant engine. Developer Assistant Creator GUI can be used only for beginners which do not want to use any command line or IDE editor for YAML files. Field "Fixed in Version" will be filled during next week when will be a new release --- Additional comment from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda on 2013-08-28 07:57:30 EDT --- Testable in devassistant-0.6.1-2.fc20 by invoking "da-gui". --------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001190.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001359] New: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001359 Bug ID: 1001359 Summary: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: a.badger(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, toshio(a)fedoraproject.org, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998574 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998574 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Python_setuptools_0.7 Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not completely compatible with previous releases. The python-setuptools "major" version may be higher than 0.7.x as there's some other structural changes happening that should not affect API. --- Additional comment from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi on 2013-08-26 12:51:51 EDT --- Currently, no rawhide packages are known to be incompatible with the updated setuptools. Moving to MODIFIED. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-June/001159.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1076963] New: 9.14.5 Recommended Partition Scheme, outdated info
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076963 Bug ID: 1076963 Summary: 9.14.5 Recommended Partition Scheme, outdated info Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Existing documentation with the problem is here: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Installation_Guide/s2-di… Here's a minimal list of problems and proposed changes for this page. 1. 9.14.5.1 recommends a layout the installer doesn't use by default. To fix it: a. Change "partitions" to "mount points", to be consistent with newui terminology, and to apply to either partitions or LVs since the default is swap, root, home on LV, and only boot is on a partition. 2. The first NOTE, under "A /boot/ partition (500 MB)": Let's just remove this. We haven't dealt with cylinders on drives for over 5 years, but rather Logical Block Addresses. I'm not sure what problem this is trying to solve, other than 2.2+TB drives in which case they need to be GPT and hope the BIOS doesn't puke. If it does, a separate /boot isn't going to fix it. Seems like very antiquated advice. 3. A root partition (3.0 GB - 5.0 GB) Change to 3 GB to 20 GB to be consistent with the body text "full desktop installation, a minimum of 20GB for the root partition is recommended". Please also drop the insignificant digit 4. Side bar "Root and /root" Both sentences are confusing, suggested rewrite: The / mount point is the top of the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy, and is referred to as the root file system, or root.The /root directory, sometimes pronounced "slash-root", is the home directory for the root user. *I consulted the v2.3 FHS to come up with this. 5. A home partition (at least 100 MB) 100MB is useless for gnome which is our default installation. Its indexer consumes 3GB for just one person. So if present, it needs to be a lot bigger than this or it should just be in /. 6. "To store user data separately from system data, create a dedicated partition within a volume group for the /home directory. This will enable you to upgrade or reinstall Fedora without erasing user data files." This is really confusing because it conflates partitions and Logical Volumes in one sentence. Rewrite as follows: "To store user data separately from system data, create a mount point for /home. This will enable you to reinstall Fedora without erasing user data." 7. "If you create many partitions instead of one large / partition, upgrades become easier." This should be removed as it's based on partitioning mythology/religion, not fact. We even say separate /usr is proscribed. Fewer volumes to assemble is less complex which is easier, but so long as we can upgrade what we permit users to create, the "ease" of upgrading should be the same and if not then it's a bug. I'd just strike this whole sentence. 8. 9.14.5.1.1 Advice on partitions. "Each kernel installed on your system requires approximately 220 MB on the /boot partition." Untrue. On /boot, kernel 3.14 takes up 18.1MB total. That includes config*, initramfs*, System.map*, and vmlinuz*. Debug kernel with a generic non-host initramfs is 45MB. Even fully installed (to both /boot and /lib) is 141MB. This should be changed to "approximately 25MB" which leaves a bit of headroom for growing kernel sizes. 9. Find all instances of "partition" and make sure we mean partition (i.e. related to an entry in the MBR or GPT) and not either "mount point" or "volume". Partition is not a good generic term for applying to Logical Volumes and Btrfs subvolumes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1029712] New: Suggestions for documentation improvement.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029712 Bug ID: 1029712 Summary: Suggestions for documentation improvement. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: r.landmann(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com, me(a)petetravis.com, mmcallis(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, r.landmann(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 994794 Thanks Leslie: Cloning to separate the Document Conventions suggestions from the Install Guide suggestions. +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #994794 +++ Improvement recommendation for Install Guide. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Insta… Under 1.1. Typographic Conventions The indented paragraph reads To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell prompt and press Enter to execute the command. I would replace the word "see" with view. To view the contents of the... See for me, would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view the contents. As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder" whereas view tranlates to "voir". A similar difference is with Spanish Please correct for Fedora 20. ====== Further on the same page... Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data loss. My comment. Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not attended to, will most likely cause data loss. ======= Follow page with Introduction Introduction This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free and open source software. Please change ... built on ... to built with. My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is built with free and open source software ======= Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you say "Install Fedora onto a computer"? My preference is to drop the "on a computer". That would shorten the sentence and accommodate some future hardware device. ======= 2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files? To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download, refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”. Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in "Of which Architecture Is My Computer?" (sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3) --- Additional comment from Pete Travis on 2013-08-08 20:59:31 EDT --- The "Typographic Conventions" content is defined by publican, the publishing tool used to create the guide. --- Additional comment from Leslie Satenstein on 2013-08-15 15:36:18 EDT --- In the installation guide, I noted that chapter two and following that "the discussion is about downloading the various versions of Fedora (netinstall, dvd, etc)." Then aas a follow up, there is a long discussion about which version of Fedora is the one to select from a list of options based on architecture and the like. Should not the latter documentation section precede the downloading information? As the comments in the guide were "for new users of Linux and experienced ones", the guide may (in my opinion) be presenting information that the individual should know about before downloading or acquiring any version. Most users of technical manuals do a two pass read. The first read is to get an appreciation of the product and guide, and the second pass is to follow the recipe. By following the recipe, it should be a) step one, determine your version and suitability of hardware b) step two determine the version of Fedora you want to install (32bit/64bit) etc. c) Download/acquire .... and so forth. The guide is almost in the step by step recipe sequence, If you go forward, would the improvements be present before Fedora 20,so the new sequence could be ready for a reviewer and his comments? And if you keep the sequence, I presume the update draft would also be ready for the reviewers and their comments. --- Additional comment from Leslie Satenstein on 2013-08-15 15:37:32 EDT --- In the installation guide, I noted that chapter two and following that "the discussion is about downloading the various versions of Fedora (netinstall, dvd, etc)." Then aas a follow up, there is a long discussion about which version of Fedora is the one to select from a list of options based on architecture and the like. Should not the latter documentation section precede the downloading information? As the comments in the guide were "for new users of Linux and experienced ones", the guide may (in my opinion) be presenting information that the individual should know about before downloading or acquiring any version. Most users of technical manuals do a two pass read. The first read is to get an appreciation of the product and guide, and the second pass is to follow the recipe. By following the recipe, it should be a) step one, determine your version and suitability of hardware b) step two determine the version of Fedora you want to install (32bit/64bit) etc. c) Download/acquire .... and so forth. The guide is almost in the step by step recipe sequence, If you go forward, would the improvements be present before Fedora 20,so the new sequence could be ready for a reviewer and his comments? And if you keep the sequence, I presume the update draft would also be ready for the reviewers and their comments. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994794 [Bug 994794] Suggestions for documentation improvement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1045205] New: post-f19 askmethod behavior should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045205 Bug ID: 1045205 Summary: post-f19 askmethod behavior should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: awilliam(a)redhat.com, g.kaviyarasu(a)hotmail.com, jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, kanarip(a)kanarip.com, maurizio.antillon(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, rtguille(a)gmail.com, sbueno(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 889887 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #889887 +++ Description of problem: If one boots the netinstall to install over nfs (or anything that is not closest mirror) one needs to wait for closest mirror to be ready. In my case it is about 20 minutes, but that will be different for other people. The issue is that anaconda has already selected (correctly) closest mirror for the netinstall iso, but it is cannot be interrupted. I wanted to install from nfs source over wi-fi but i must wait my SLOW(TM) internet connection prior to selecting nfs as an INSTALLATION SOURCE. If anaconda has access to the internet, everything has to wait for closest mirror to be ready. Please, consider adding a small timeout that allows one to enter INSTALLATION DESTINATION to override the closes mirror. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F18-TC2 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot anaconda netinstall 2. wait for closest mirror to be ready 3. select your nfs installation source and install. Actual results: long wait for an installation source to be setup which will not be used. Expected results: some time to enter INSTALLATION SOURCE and be able to select nfs (or other) without waiting for closest mirror. Additional info: --- Additional comment from Chris Lumens on 2013-01-22 15:30:11 EST --- I do somewhat agree, given that we've got this shiny installation source UI that we then don't really let you use. On the other hand, our threading/spoke stuff doesn't really work in this direction. Threads can wait on other things to be completed but there's not really any way to stop a thread when you enter a spoke. So, I think implementation of this would be very difficult. Would you settle for a check for the old "askmethod" command line parameter and not immediately fire up the mirror checking stuff if that parameter exists? --- Additional comment from Reartes Guillermo on 2013-01-23 16:46:11 EST --- > Would you settle for a check for the old "askmethod" command line parameter > and not immediately fire up the mirror checking stuff if that parameter exists? I have no objection for such proposal. The current workaround (Fedora Release NetInstall ISO) is: 1. Start Anaconda and reach the MAIN HUB 2. Enter NETWORK CONFGURATION and 'disable' the Network 3. Wait for INSTALLATION SOURCE to be back in 'Nothing Selected' 4. Enter NETWORK CONFGURATION and 'enable' the Network 5. Enter INSTALLATION SOURCE and now select NFS or other. In my test (KVM Guest) it works, but i don't know if this workaround do work with all network cards at them moment. (It should but there could be bugs). Since this workaround is somewhat simple, maybe it should be documented as the default way of aborting the automatic selection of closest mirror by Anaconda for NetInstall Images. In that case, nothing new is needed. Cheers. --- Additional comment from Adam Williamson on 2013-05-11 02:33:13 EDT --- Tested with F19 Beta TC3. The askmethod behaviour described in c#1 has been added. It works, though it's somewhat ugly: it leaves the Installation Source spoke in an 'error' condition. But it works. --- Additional comment from Adam Williamson on 2013-05-13 12:38:48 EDT --- Note, Reartes took the testing further than me, and found that if you actually try to complete an install with the new parameter, it fails: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962098 . --- Additional comment from Reartes Guillermo on 2013-06-01 17:05:55 EDT --- There parameter 'askmethod', it is still not usable due to the issue in comment #3. Re-Tested with F19b RC4 (19.30-1) --- Additional comment from Adam Williamson on 2013-06-02 13:54:58 EDT --- How do you mean 'not usable'? It does what it's meant to do: lets you go into the spoke immediately. I wouldn't call that 'not usable'. ======================================== Also refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda_Boot_Options?rd=Anaconda/Options Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889887 [Bug 889887] please add a small timeout in netinstall images for INSTALLATION SOURCE that permits one to override the 'closest mirror' selection (and the long wait it might imply) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1065771] New: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065771 Bug ID: 1065771 Summary: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: sclark(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Created attachment 863833 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=863833&action=edit The attached archive contains patches to implement this change Following instructions in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs remove the version number from the directory name for all references to any package documentation directory in /usr/share/doc , leaving just the package's name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1079540] New: Document SELinux sandboxing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079540 Bug ID: 1079540 Summary: Document SELinux sandboxing Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co What is SELinux sandboxing and why should I care? How do I do it? These questions and more should be covered in the Security Guide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1008204] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008204 Bug ID: 1008204 Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, pspacek(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, tbabej(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998522 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured zones. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. --- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT --- It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for Fedora 20 beta. From: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface (i.e. revert patches for user interface) --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT --- Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version to rawhide. Thanks for update! ----------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1008203] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008203 Bug ID: 1008203 Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pspacek(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tbabej(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998522 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured zones. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. --- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT --- It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for Fedora 20 beta. From: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface (i.e. revert patches for user interface) --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT --- Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version to rawhide. Thanks for update! ----------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion available at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1002289] New: it is deprecated, right?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002289 Bug ID: 1002289 Summary: it is deprecated, right? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: translation-quick-start-guide Assignee: noriko(a)redhat.com Reporter: kraymond(a)shaiton.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: aalam(a)redhat.com, dimitris(a)glezos.com, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, noriko(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Hi, this guide is deprecated IMHO. The L10n team moved to the wiki while we moved from transifex.fedoraproject.org to fedora.transifex.net The new guide is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Guide I removed this guide from the fedora-docs release at transifex.com (but it's just a name to gather guides). The guide is still at https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/translation-quick-start-guide/ I can see that Raven has blocked the translations. nice. Please update (or close?) the fedorahosted repo https://fedorahosted.org/translation-quick-start-guide/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008575] New: Install Guide Tweaking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Dec '14

07 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008575 Bug ID: 1008575 Summary: Install Guide Tweaking Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Please consider corrections for Fedora 20 install guide. The following is my feedback for F19 Install guide. Description of problem: Improvement recommendation for Install Guide. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Insta… Under 1.1. Typographic Conventions The indented paragraph reads To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell prompt and press Enter to execute the command. I would replace the word "see" with view. To view the contents of the... For me, "see" would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view the contents. As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder" whereas view translates to "voir". Il voit le contenu. Please correct for Fedora 20. ====== Further on the same page... Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data loss. My comment. Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not attended to, will most likely cause data loss. ======= Follow page with Introduction Introduction This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free and open source software. Please change ... built on ... to built with. My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is built with free and open source software ======= Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you say "Install Fedora onto a computer"? If the latter is more correct, this fragment is found within the Audience section. ======= 2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files? To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download, refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”. Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in "Of which Architecture Is My Computer?" (sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1069985] New: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069985 Bug ID: 1069985 Summary: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Release notes for Fedora 20 contains nothing about the changes to kickstart options. It would be helpful if changes to kickstart options will be noticed in future release notes too. Now I know that I have to check the wiki diffs of the Anaconda/Kickstart wiki page to see the changes, but other administrators may check only the release notes. An example is the "--addsupport=" option to the "lang" kickstart option which was added to Fedora 20 (I assume... - I have no information about the time of the change), together with "%packages ... -instLangs=..." still not implemented. Please see also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051816#c11 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 release notes. How reproducible: Always. Another note: This request is to improve the next release notes. But I want to note that there should a place (web page, wiki page, etc.) too where additional (late) informations can be added to release notes of already released Fedora versions. Is such a place available? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1060328] New: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060328 Bug ID: 1060328 Summary: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed (section 2.8.1) during normal installs. It appears, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSyslog, that it got moved from @core to @standard. However, I suspect that a lot of users will do installs that include @standard, and as a result they will get rsyslog installed and perhaps be confused as to why they got it when the Release Notes imply it is no longer included. I can confirm that the repodata/ac802acf81ab55a0eca1fe5d1222bd15b8fab45d302dfdf4e626716d374b6a64-Fedora-20-comps.xml file on the x86_64 install DVD contains rsyslog in the @standard package group. Also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSendmail implies that sendmail got moved from @core to @standard, whereas it appears to me that it actually got removed from both of them (at least I can't find it anywhere in the comps.xml file). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 x86_64 DVD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1063068] New: Wrong distribution mentioned ;)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063068 Bug ID: 1063068 Summary: Wrong distribution mentioned ;) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Severity: medium Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: hetz(a)hetz.biz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Description of problem: the page regarding the compatibility mentioning wrong Linux distributin Here is the page: http://hetz.me/y30lk As you can see, it mentions "Fedora 6". IMHO it should be Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 - as Fedora 6 is dead long time ago ;) Also, Where can I see the latest version of the doc? or is it always the same URL as right now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1001374] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001374 Bug ID: 1001374 Summary: Web Assets Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely to other code in the distribution. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001371] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001371 Bug ID: 1001371 Summary: Web Assets Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely to other code in the distribution. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008210] New: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008210 Bug ID: 1008210 Summary: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: abokovoy(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998502 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998502 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3TransitiveTrusts FreeIPA will support transitive trusts with Active Directory --- Additional comment from Alexander Bokovoy on 2013-08-26 23:20:18 EDT --- I'm on vacation and will only be able to work fully on the feature starting September. ----------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185634.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1015896] New: Documentation error in FreeIPA guide "Setting up a Kerberized NFS Server"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015896 Bug ID: 1015896 Summary: Documentation error in FreeIPA guide "Setting up a Kerberized NFS Server" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: freeipa-guide Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Reporter: bschneiders(a)woti.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dlackey(a)redhat.com Description of problem: A command example is missing from the text of the guide. This example still exists in the coresponding RHEL documentation. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/kerb-nfs.h… Actual results: If ipa-getkeytab command is run on the NFS server, then save the keys directly to the host keytab. For example: For a Fedora machine, that's all you need to do. Expected results: If ipa-getkeytab command is run on the NFS server, then save the keys directly to the host keytab. For example: [jsmith@server ~]$ ipa-getkeytab -s server.example.com -p nfs/nfs-server.example.com -k /etc/krb5.keytab For a Fedora machine, that's all you need to do. Additional info: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1080575] New: Forgetting: condition="fedora"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080575 Bug ID: 1080575 Summary: Forgetting: condition="fedora" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: freeipa-guide Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dlackey(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In automount.xml, line 467/468 <screen condition="redhat">[jsmith@server ~]$ ipa-getkeytab -k /etc/krb5.keytab -p host/nfs-client-server.example.com(a)EXAMPLE.COM</screen> the screen for "fedora" is forgotten. When you "publican" on fedora the automount.po file, the example dont appear. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): present How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: " Si la commande ipa-getkeytab est exécutée sur le client NFS, enregistrer alors les clés directement dans le tableau de clés de l'hôte. Par exemple : Pour une machine sous Fedora, c'est tout ce qu'il est nécessaire de faire." Expected results: " Si la commande ipa-getkeytab est exécutée sur le client NFS, enregistrer alors les clés directement dans le tableau de clés de l'hôte. Par exemple : [jsmith@server ~]$ ipa-getkeytab -k /etc/krb5.keytab -p host/nfs-client-server.example.com(a)EXAMPLE.COM Pour une machine sous Fedora, c'est tout ce qu'il est nécessaire de faire." Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001356] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001356 Bug ID: 1001356 Summary: No Default Syslog Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998573 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically, remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. In particular, review for coverage of `journalctl` and journald features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 986370] New: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986370 Bug ID: 986370 Summary: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: justin.mitchell.bennett(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Description of problem: With OEMs shipping preloads of Windows 8 on new purchase computers, UEFI tends to be enabled by default. Though Fedora can work with a secure boot UEFI bios, certain features have been disable (See Fedora 18 UEFI Secure Boot Edition 18.4). As hibernation (suspend to disk) functionality has been disabled on an UEFI Secure Boot system, users need to be aware, prior to installation of Fedora (as sole OS on the system), whether to enable or disable this functionality. Those using Fedora on a laptop/netbook, shouldn't discover *after* completing installation, that hibernation has been disabled. It becomes a huge pain, to google how to disable the /boot/efi partition, and grub2, if even possible. If not documented or referenced in the install-guide, CommonBugs should make note of this issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 18, Fedora 19 How reproducible: Install Fedora on a system with a Secure Boot, UEFI, enabled bios. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001049] New: Reinstallation method is not explained
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001049 Bug ID: 1001049 Summary: Reinstallation method is not explained Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: wifienclair(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In paragraph 18.1 Determining Whether to Upgrade or Re-Install, it is written: "This recommended reinstallation method helps to ensure the best system stability possible." But I didn't find a reinstallation method in the document. I suggest to replace this sentence by something like: "The reinstallation method is recommended to ensure the best system stability possible." and to add a paragraph or a chapter on how to reinstall. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1012697] New: There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4 chapter (Kickstart options) and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012697 Bug ID: 1012697 Summary: There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4 chapter (Kickstart options) and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co It seems Wiki is more updated, because at least in "upgrade" option shows a note like this: "Note that from F18 onward, upgrades are no longer supported in anaconda and should be done with FedUp, the Fedora update tool.", whereas in Install Guide this note doesn't exist. And there are more differences between these two places, so I'm confused about which of these is the right place to have the right reference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1001367] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367 Bug ID: 1001367 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001187.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1021602] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021602 Bug ID: 1021602 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 Blocks: 1001367, 1001368 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:45:00 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Matthew Miller on 2013-10-15 14:41:27 EDT --- Here's the current status: A) New web site design will put cloud on equal footing as described. Will continue to work with web team on this. B) Yes, we have basic cloud image release criteria. C) The updated koji isn't in place for image generation with the new method, so we will just use the old one. Not a problem but we may need to kludge things differently in the kickstart file. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-16 06:58:37 EDT --- Ok, thanks, setting the Change to ON_QA. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998582 [Bug 998582] Visible Cloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367 [Bug 1001367] Visible Cloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001368 [Bug 1001368] Visible Cloud -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001335] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335 Bug ID: 1001335 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, rhughes(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186166.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021600] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021600 Bug ID: 1021600 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562, 1002288 Blocks: 1001335, 1001336 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-27 11:26:43 EDT --- Application Installer is tracked/still under discussion by FESCo. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-28 14:43:51 EDT --- Current status from Change Page: The hawkey backend is available in PackageKit git master. gnome-software is available in git.gnome.org. Neither is in f20 yet. We are aiming for a first gnome-software release by end of August, and will package it asap, then. --- Additional comment from Matthias Clasen on 2013-09-02 13:52:34 EDT --- gnome-software has been built for f20 today --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:26 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-21 09:06:29 EDT --- Change is completed, moving to ON_QA as agreed with the owner. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998562 [Bug 998562] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335 [Bug 1001335] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001336 [Bug 1001336] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002288 [Bug 1002288] Review Request: gnome-software - A software center for GNOME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1036625] New: Link to docs.redhat.com should properly link to access.redhat.com
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036625 Bug ID: 1036625 Summary: Link to docs.redhat.com should properly link to access.redhat.com Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In Section 3, Acknowledgements, link to "docs.redhat.com" (correctly) redirects to access.redhat.com, but links should really link directly to the correct page, I think. Not sure if this has already been logged, it's possible there are other links with the same property. rday -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001364] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001364 Bug ID: 1001364 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001195.h… and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186623.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1021603] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021603 Bug ID: 1021603 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: adam(a)spicenitz.org, jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 Blocks: 1001364, 1001365 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. --- Additional comment from Adam Goode on 2013-09-25 22:50:18 EDT --- This should be fixed in rawhide. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:54 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993551 [Bug 993551] F20 Unversioned doc dirs tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998579 [Bug 998579] Unversioned Docdirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001364 [Bug 1001364] Unversioned Docdirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001365 [Bug 1001365] Unversioned Docdirs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1021203] New: PDF version of Installation Guide misformatted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021203 Bug ID: 1021203 Summary: PDF version of Installation Guide misformatted Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ruslan.khafizov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: PDF version of Installation Guide looks unusual. Margins are huge and take 2/3 of page width. Font is quite small and barely readable. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 19 How reproducible: Download document from http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Installation_Guide/Fedora… Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Installation_Guide/Fedora… 2. See. Actual results: pdf document which is hard to read Expected results: pdf document which can be read and printed. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 991093] New: Innacurate information about deleting data in 12. Storage and partitioning
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991093 Bug ID: 991093 Summary: Innacurate information about deleting data in 12. Storage and partitioning Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Below is a copypaste of two e-mails from docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org explaining the issue. ================================================================================ Mail 1 from Adam Williamson: Someone on the forums kindly pointed out an inaccuracy in the Installation Guide: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Quick_Star… "All data will be erased during installation from the disks you select at this stage. Do not select disks that contain data you want to preserve." This is not correct. It would be correct to say that no data can *possibly* be deleted from any disks you *don't* select at this stage, but it is not true that all data will be removed from disks you *do* select. Suggesting that this is the case prevents people from following lots of common install paths. What actually happens to the data on the selected disks depends on the user's choices at Installation Options and 'custom partitioning' or Reclaim Space. If you go to custom partitioning, basically, you're in complete control of what happens; you can do all sorts of stuff from there, but no data/partitions will be lost unless you explicitly choose for that to happen. If the disk has sufficient unpartitioned space and you just pick the easiest 'install into empty space' path, no existing data will be disturbed, though any existing bootloader in the MBR will be overwritten (this is normal and has always been the case). If you go through Reclaim Space, you get the choice of what existing partitions to delete or resize. ===================================================================== Mail 2 from Chris Murphy: Yeah, the user actually needs to go to some extreme lengths to erase all data on the selected disk. In Custom, it's deleted one partition at a time, with an optional shortcut that popsup offering to delete all related partitions (which still may not be all data on disk). Further, a summary pops up and shows what will be deleted in red text. In Guided, user either must set each partition to be deleted, or click on the disk (make model number) and set it to delete which then shows all partitions being set to delete as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1036643] New: Example 3.1 appears to mix references to 32- and 64-bit install DVD isos
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036643 Bug ID: 1036643 Summary: Example 3.1 appears to mix references to 32- and 64-bit install DVD isos Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In Example 3.1 in the current install guide, the mount command refers to a 64-bit version of the ISO, but the final call to "livecd-iso-to-disk" refers to a 32-bit version of the ISO. Is this deliberate? It seems potentially confusing. rday -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 995886] New: kickstart "repo" suboptions incomplete
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995886 Bug ID: 995886 Summary: kickstart "repo" suboptions incomplete Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: stephent98(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Description of problem: For the kickstart "repo" option, the F19 Installation Guide lists three suboptions: repo --name=<repoid> [--baseurl=<url>| --mirrorlist=<url>] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ki… The Anaconda/Kickstart wiki lists nine suboptions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo repo --name=<name> [--baseurl=<url>|--mirrorlist=<url>] [options] --name= --baseurl= --mirrorlist= --cost= --excludepkgs= --includepkgs= --proxy=[protocol://][username[:password]@]host[:port] --ignoregroups=true --noverifyssl Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 Installation Guide http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ki… Anaconda/Kickstart wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo Additional info: Bug 995526 - regression: --cost ignored in kickstart file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982656] New: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation Complete
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982656 Bug ID: 982656 Summary: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation Complete Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Documentation Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pkovar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Hey Petr, Just a couple of suggestions for section 9.17. Installation Complete "Now that you have configured the remaining settings, your Fedora installation is now complete!" --> "Now that you have configured the remaining settings, your Fedora installation is complete." "9.17.1. Initial Setup in GNOME" --> GNOME Initial Setup "haven't" --> "have not" "The Initial Setup application is only available for GNOME." This might need some rewording since we now have two initial setup apps in Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewFirstboot, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/InitialExperience) that do almost the same thing, but target different DEs. "create an user account" --> "create a user account" "After you are finished configuring" --> "After you have finished configuring" "On the first login, the Gnome Help application will automatically open" The application is called Yelp, not Gnome Help. However, you probably just want to mention that "GNOME Help will automatically open...". "Figure 9.40. Language selection in Gnome Initial Setup" --> "Language selection in GNOME Initial Setup" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 904083] New: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904083 Bug ID: 904083 Summary: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: storage-administration-guide Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es I've seen in http://docs.fedoraproject.org that last version of "Storage Administration Guide" is for Fedora 14. It's more than two years ago!! I don't know if this fact is due to this guide doesn't need any update or if it's due to a lack of love from editors. I want to notify this in Bugzilla to remember this situation, but I'm not sure it is really a bug... Could you tell me the reason of this abandonment? Thanks!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1010674] New: kdeaccessibility
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '14

29 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010674 Bug ID: 1010674 Summary: kdeaccessibility Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: accessibility-guide Assignee: gerard(a)ryan.lt Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: gerard(a)ryan.lt, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Hi, In transifex: "In Fedora, <application>KMouseTool</application> is packaged in the <package>kdeaccessibility</package> package. This package also contains kmagnifier, kmouth, and ktts, all of which are discussed in other areas of this guide. To install <package>kdeaccessibility</package> you can either select <menuchoice><guilabel>System > Administration > Add/Remove Software</guilabel></menuchoice> and then type in <package>kdeaccessibility</package> in the screen that pops up, or in a terminal window type su -c "yum install kdeaccessibility"." I just searched and found kmousetool has been packaged as standalone package from f20, should we revise the doc? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 995128] New: Add a UEFI not compatible arch (i686)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995128 Bug ID: 995128 Summary: Add a UEFI not compatible arch (i686) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: kraymond(a)shaiton.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Please add that the i686 releases are not UEFI compatible on the following section: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/ch-ne… This is the one we use to choose the arch, that's where it should fit, more than in table 3.1 (Boot and installation media) or Chap 7 (Booting the Installer). Related to BZ#994854 Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1050178] New: Fedora - Documentation website - Updated Czech translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050178 Bug ID: 1050178 Summary: Fedora - Documentation website - Updated Czech translation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an updated Czech translation of the Fedora Documentation Website (docsite-publican). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Published version shows some typos and untranslated strings. Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1043292] New: simple typos
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043292 Bug ID: 1043292 Summary: simple typos Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Few typos found in some of the guide chapters/files: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: 1. File: Making_USB_Media Line 281 (last para): Use this method for the distribution image, the minimal boot media image, or on systems with a UNIX operating system (including Mac OX X). Incorrect name of the Apple operating system. 2. File: Making_Minimal_Boot_Media Line 27 (5th para, 3rd item/indent of the list Use minimal boot media): to use a kickstart file during installation (refer to <xref linkend="s2-kickstart2-boot-media"/> The ending round bracket/parenthesis is missing. 3. File: Procedure_dd_Image_to_USB Line 22 (3rd para, preceding the output of dmesg command): ...The output will identify the <systemitem>device node</systemitem> of the drive, in this case <literal>/dev/sdc</literal>: The actual output however contains sdd (inconsistency). Expected results: 1. Should be Mac OS X 2. The ending round bracket/parenthesis should be added 3. The device name should be changed to /dev/sdd Additional info: Just noticed, while doing the translation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982517] New: 4.4.1. Adding a New User
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982517 Bug ID: 982517 Summary: 4.4.1. Adding a New User Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 4.4.1 at item number 6 explaining the user creation process, it is inferred that the contents of /etc/skel are as follows: . .. .bash_logout .bash_profile .bashrc .gnome2 .mozilla They are in fact: . .. .bash_logout .bash_profile .bashrc .mozilla .zshrc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1023496] New: 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection - no IPsec tab found
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023496 Bug ID: 1023496 Summary: 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection - no IPsec tab found Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: bobgus(a)rcn.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 816182 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=816182&action=edit When I type system-config-network, this is what I see Description of problem: In section 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection The first few steps don't seem to work: 1) In a command shell, type system-config-network to start the Network Administration Tool. 2) On the IPsec tab, click New to start the IPsec configuration wizard. I don't see any IPsec tab. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@hoho6 user1]# uname -a Linux hoho6.chidig.com 3.11.6-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 18 22:34:18 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@hoho6 user1]# I did a yum update a few minutes ago. How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. open a terminal session, log in as root 2. type 'system-config-network' 3. look for IPsec tab. Actual results: Could not find IPsec tab Expected results: Found IPsec tab Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 891931] New: Chapter 3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891931 Bug ID: 891931 Summary: Chapter 3 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: jwboyer(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I wrote this a couple of weeks ago: http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46149.html It details building a custom kernel. Feel free to use anything you'd like from there. However, it doesn't cover: - generating your own key/certs - signing shim or grub2 (trivially derived from the existing kernel example) - third party module signing Peter is working on a tool to make generating certs that UEFI likes easier for people. I was waiting for that tool to be available before really covering those aspects, as that is what we want users to use. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1071943] New: Manual does not compile in f20
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071943 Bug ID: 1071943 Summary: Manual does not compile in f20 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: defensive-coding-guide Assignee: fweimer(a)redhat.com Reporter: nmavrogi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fweimer(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Does not compile How reproducible: In f20, after installing publican" and the "publican-fedora" packages, try "make build-manual". Output: ... Can't open file 'tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Web_Applications.xml' not well-formed (invalid token) at line 46, column 43, byte 2693: Won't be escaped (DON'T DO THIS!) <h:outputText value="#{param.name}" escape=false> ==========================================^ </code> at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/XML/Parser.pm line 187. at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Publican/Builder/DocBook4.pm line 484. make: *** [build-manual] Error 255 using escape="false" instead fixes the issue, but different errors show up. I'm not familiar with docbook to provide a fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1035500] New: F19 security guide - iptables intallation command is wrong
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035500 Bug ID: 1035500 Summary: F19 security guide - iptables intallation command is wrong Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: maxime.carron(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The command to install iptables-services is wrong in fedora 19 documentation Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Current version (fedora 19), security guide, chapter "3.8.9.1. Using the iptables service" link : http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Security_Guide/sec-Disab… Actual results: quote : Then install the iptables-service package by entering the following command as root: ~]# iptables-service Expected results: The command should be : yum install iptables-services -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 995595] New: Allocators.xml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995595 Bug ID: 995595 Summary: Allocators.xml Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: defensive-coding-guide Assignee: fweimer(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fweimer(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In Allocators.xml, line 135 to 138, you write: " .... For instance, to allocate an array of <literal>n</literal> elements of type <literal>T</literal>, check that the requested size is not greater than <literal>n / sizeof(T)</literal>." It is not rather? " .... For instance, to allocate an array of <literal>n</literal> elements of type <literal>T</literal>, check that the requested size is not smaller than <literal>n * sizeof(T)</literal>." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1030257] New: Typo Fedora Amateur Radio Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030257 Bug ID: 1030257 Summary: Typo Fedora Amateur Radio Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: amateur-radio-guide Assignee: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Reporter: ikhyar.com(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: sparks(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: in transifex contain space typos in words "e dge" to "edge" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): transifex How reproducible: - Steps to Reproduce: - 1. 2. 3. Actual results: e dge Expected results: edge Additional info: Thanks for correcting these typos. https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-amateur-radio-guide/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 892673] New: UEFI Secure Boot Guide: suggestions for edits
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892673 Bug ID: 892673 Summary: UEFI Secure Boot Guide: suggestions for edits Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com Replace: "With the planned release of Windows 8, Microsoft has decided that all hardware that is marked "Windows 8 client ready" should" With: "Microsoft requires that client devices carrying the Windows 8 logo must" Replace: "This means that Fedora as it stands booted on such hardware will refuse to boot until the user disables secure boot in the firmware." With: "The UEFI boot loader on Fedora installation media and on the installed system are signed with the Microsoft key, to enable booting and installation on such systems." Remove the following paragraph, ending in "This plan has been approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee as of 23-Jul-2012." After: "any operations from userland which cause userland-defined DMA" Insert: "disable support for hibernate/suspend-to-disk, and other features which would allow executing arbitrary code in kernel mode (even for the root user)." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 782916] New: value of security measures; no metric, no scope description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: value of security measures; no metric, no scope description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782916 Summary: value of security measures; no metric, no scope description Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: security-guide AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: budden(a)nps.navy.mil QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, eric(a)christensenplace.us, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: The juncture between computer security and network security is inadequate -- too many seams which leaves too many man-in-middle attack opportunities. The most egregious omission in this (otherwise pretty good) document is treatment of SCOPE. This probably belongs in the vicinity of 1.3. Analysis first. Map each of the security solutions you have in the guide onto the ISO Reference Model: Layer 1/2 security measures (like WiFi security) protect frames. The scope of the security is limited to a single segment. No security beyond the router and no security within end systems. Layer 3 security protected datagrams (VPNs do this, IPSec ....). The scope is an enclave tunneled through an internetwork. The protection cannot extend beyond the VPN boxes, so data is wholly unprotected within end systems (and LAN if the VPN box is associated with the last router). Layer 4/5 security includes SSL (aka TLS). You have a how-to for securing an http server (good) but no admonitions regarding scope -- the security extends from the TCP socket in one end system to the TCP socket at the other end of the connection -- again no security inside the OS comes from SSL. All of the above security measures protect infrastructure. But they do not protect the data. Layer 6/7 security measures protect the data. Here the scope _can be_ truly end to end. S/MIME is a good example (so is ssh and XML sign/crypt) where the data passes over the internet and through the OS in protected form. Only in a fairly small space is the data unprotected. In Evolution, for example, only the parts of the UA that deal with composing, reading, ... mail are places where the authenticity and confidentiality of the data is possible. Most of the rest of the UA (including all the filing system deals with data that has been protected exactly the way it's been sent over the network. In the case of Evolution (UAs differ in implementation) secured data is stored in the file system exactly the way it was transmitted. Recommendations: 1) include a mapping similar to above so users have an idea what the scope of this or that security measure is. 2) emphasize those security measures that apply to applications (layer 6/7) as Fedora distribution evolves and matures. (What got me here this morning is the continuing frustration getting Evolution to properly play ball with DoD CAC cards ... works, but doesn't 'just work'). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Security Guide 16.3 (doesn't have a date) How reproducible: The above analysis doesn't invent anything; it only organizes and sorts. Anyone can reproduce it. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1005452] New: Outdated information
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005452 Bug ID: 1005452 Summary: Outdated information Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Severity: medium Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Quoted from http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…: The RPM bindings for Python are documented along with the C programming API. On a Red Hat Linux system, look in the file /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.1/apidocs/html/group__python.html to see the start of the Python-specific documentation. Note that much of this online documentation covers the C functions that provide the Python bindings, not the Python API itself. But, if you examine the online information on objects listed as classes, such as rpmts, you can find the Python-specific documentation. Furthermore, if you look into the .c files that make up the Python bindings, you can find PyMethodDef structure tables. These tables provide useful glimpses into the Python API. To learn more about programming in Python, install the python-docs package. The python-docs package has a large set of online documentation for Python, including the official Python Tutorial. With Red Hat Linux, start at /usr/share/doc/python-docs-2.2.1/html/tut/tut.html. Cross Reference Other tutorials are available at http://diveintopython.org for the Dive Into Python tutorial for experienced programmers, and at http://py.vaults.ca/parnassus/apyllo.py/935043691.636055170 for the Vaults of Parnassus listing of tutorials. I think we need to update some words like RPM4.1, /usr/share/doc/python-docs-2.2.1 (F20 docdir changes) and Red Hat Linux .... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1047428] New: ABRT section has deprecated service commands
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '14

28 May '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047428 Bug ID: 1047428 Summary: ABRT section has deprecated service commands Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Created attachment 843622 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=843622&action=edit This patch corrects the reported issue. The ABRT section has commands that use the deprecated service and chkconfig utilities instead of systemctl. The section should be updated to reflect the migration to systemd. I have attached a patch to correct this, please review and apply. Feedback would be welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1080005] New: Revision history shows version 1.1-0 released in the future
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080005 Bug ID: 1080005 Summary: Revision history shows version 1.1-0 released in the future Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: fedorabugs(a)aylett.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Power_Management_Guide/… gives the release date of 1.1-0 as 17 December 2014, which is in the future. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.1-0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 977063] New: New NetworkManager features should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Mar '14

21 Mar '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977063 Bug ID: 977063 Summary: New NetworkManager features should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com NetworkManager now offers hotspot functionality, allowing users to easily share a non-wireless connection over a wireless interface. As of F19, NetworkManager allows the creation and usage of both bridge and bond virtual devices. These features should be documented in the System Administrator's guide. --Pete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1071699] New: partition type crossref to partition type strings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071699 Bug ID: 1071699 Summary: partition type crossref to partition type strings Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-reference-guide Severity: medium Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugz.to.anomalyst(a)xoxy.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1066196 Description of problem: need a man page to 'officially' document partition types and their text string translations. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: May I suggest a centralized file /etc/fstype which would document the GPT fstypes and maybe a brief overview their history (date created & date modified) and official text translations. Its very difficult find this information with a search engine the closest thing I have found is "sgdisk --list-types" see also <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066194> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa March 2014