[Bug 1956227] New: DNF System Upgrade page links to non-existent
component=dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956227
Bug ID: 1956227
Summary: DNF System Upgrade page links to non-existent
component=dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: install-guide
Severity: high
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: info(a)skierpage.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
(there's no Fedora Documentation component for Upgrading to a new release, or
Quick Docs)
Description of problem:
I followed https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/,
it went smoothly, well done!
But under "Frequently Asked Questions - How do I report issues with the
upgrade?", the step
Search Bugzilla for an existing bug report.
is a link to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=dnf-plugin-system-upgra...
The bug list currently has one open bug 1767781 for the component
dnf-plugin-system-upgrade, but this doesn't seem to be a valid component any
more; it's not in the pop-up list when you enter a new bug. I'm not sure what
the correct component is for dnf system-upgrade bugs: some bugs are filed
against dnf, and others against dnf-plugins-extras.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Not applicable.
How reproducible:
Every time.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Read https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/
2. Follow the link in "Search _Bugzilla for an existing bug report_."3
3. Try to file a bug.
Actual results:
Only one open bug for dnf-plugin-system-upgrade, and you can't choose this
Fedora component to enter a new bug.
Expected results:
Link should show a list of bugs with current system-update.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
5 months, 1 week
[Bug 2151717] New: The atopacctd.8 man page is not packaged in the
Fedora Project's RPM
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151717
Bug ID: 2151717
Summary: The atopacctd.8 man page is not packaged in the Fedora
Project's RPM
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: docs-requests
Severity: medium
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: metta.crawler(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Document URL: N/A
Section Number and Name: N/A
Describe the issue:
Description of problem:
The atopacctd.8 man page is not packaged in the Fedora Project's RPM, despite
it being referenced in the other atop man pages and also in the
atopacct.service systemd unit file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
atop-2.7.1-3.fc37.src.rpm
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. $ sudo dnf install atop
2. Run:
$ systemctl status atopacct.service | grep Docs:
Docs: man:atopacctd(8)
3. Run:
$ man atop | grep -A1 SEE.ALSO
SEE ALSO
atopsar(1), atopconvert(1), atopcat(1), atoprc(5), atopacctd(8),
netatop(4), netatopd(8), atopgpud(8), logrotate(8)
4. Run:
$ man atop | grep -A1 SEE.ALSO | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $5}'
atopacctd(8),
5. Run:
$ man atopacctd
No manual entry for atopacctd
Actual results:
Four man pages and a systemd unit file all mention a man page that is not
installed despite it being in the upstream release.
Suggestions for improvement:
Expected results:
All man pages provided by the upstream release are included in the binary RPM.
Additional information:
Copr repo with atop packaging modified to include the atopacctd(8) man page:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mettacrawler/atop-with-atopacctd....
Bug report where I ask an atop package maintainer to fix this they/them slammed
the door in my face:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151033
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151717
1 year, 4 months