docs-qa April 2014

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
150 discussions

[Bug 1001367] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367 Bug ID: 1001367 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001187.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1021602] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021602 Bug ID: 1021602 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 Blocks: 1001367, 1001368 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:45:00 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Matthew Miller on 2013-10-15 14:41:27 EDT --- Here's the current status: A) New web site design will put cloud on equal footing as described. Will continue to work with web team on this. B) Yes, we have basic cloud image release criteria. C) The updated koji isn't in place for image generation with the new method, so we will just use the old one. Not a problem but we may need to kludge things differently in the kickstart file. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-16 06:58:37 EDT --- Ok, thanks, setting the Change to ON_QA. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998582 [Bug 998582] Visible Cloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367 [Bug 1001367] Visible Cloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001368 [Bug 1001368] Visible Cloud -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001335] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335 Bug ID: 1001335 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, rhughes(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186166.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021600] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021600 Bug ID: 1021600 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562, 1002288 Blocks: 1001335, 1001336 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-27 11:26:43 EDT --- Application Installer is tracked/still under discussion by FESCo. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-28 14:43:51 EDT --- Current status from Change Page: The hawkey backend is available in PackageKit git master. gnome-software is available in git.gnome.org. Neither is in f20 yet. We are aiming for a first gnome-software release by end of August, and will package it asap, then. --- Additional comment from Matthias Clasen on 2013-09-02 13:52:34 EDT --- gnome-software has been built for f20 today --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:26 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-21 09:06:29 EDT --- Change is completed, moving to ON_QA as agreed with the owner. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998562 [Bug 998562] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335 [Bug 1001335] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001336 [Bug 1001336] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002288 [Bug 1002288] Review Request: gnome-software - A software center for GNOME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1036625] New: Link to docs.redhat.com should properly link to access.redhat.com
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036625 Bug ID: 1036625 Summary: Link to docs.redhat.com should properly link to access.redhat.com Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In Section 3, Acknowledgements, link to "docs.redhat.com" (correctly) redirects to access.redhat.com, but links should really link directly to the correct page, I think. Not sure if this has already been logged, it's possible there are other links with the same property. rday -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001364] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001364 Bug ID: 1001364 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001195.h… and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186623.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1021603] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021603 Bug ID: 1021603 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: adam(a)spicenitz.org, jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 Blocks: 1001364, 1001365 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. --- Additional comment from Adam Goode on 2013-09-25 22:50:18 EDT --- This should be fixed in rawhide. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:54 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993551 [Bug 993551] F20 Unversioned doc dirs tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998579 [Bug 998579] Unversioned Docdirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001364 [Bug 1001364] Unversioned Docdirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001365 [Bug 1001365] Unversioned Docdirs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1021203] New: PDF version of Installation Guide misformatted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021203 Bug ID: 1021203 Summary: PDF version of Installation Guide misformatted Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ruslan.khafizov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: PDF version of Installation Guide looks unusual. Margins are huge and take 2/3 of page width. Font is quite small and barely readable. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 19 How reproducible: Download document from http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Installation_Guide/Fedora… Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Installation_Guide/Fedora… 2. See. Actual results: pdf document which is hard to read Expected results: pdf document which can be read and printed. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 991093] New: Innacurate information about deleting data in 12. Storage and partitioning
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991093 Bug ID: 991093 Summary: Innacurate information about deleting data in 12. Storage and partitioning Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Below is a copypaste of two e-mails from docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org explaining the issue. ================================================================================ Mail 1 from Adam Williamson: Someone on the forums kindly pointed out an inaccuracy in the Installation Guide: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Quick_Star… "All data will be erased during installation from the disks you select at this stage. Do not select disks that contain data you want to preserve." This is not correct. It would be correct to say that no data can *possibly* be deleted from any disks you *don't* select at this stage, but it is not true that all data will be removed from disks you *do* select. Suggesting that this is the case prevents people from following lots of common install paths. What actually happens to the data on the selected disks depends on the user's choices at Installation Options and 'custom partitioning' or Reclaim Space. If you go to custom partitioning, basically, you're in complete control of what happens; you can do all sorts of stuff from there, but no data/partitions will be lost unless you explicitly choose for that to happen. If the disk has sufficient unpartitioned space and you just pick the easiest 'install into empty space' path, no existing data will be disturbed, though any existing bootloader in the MBR will be overwritten (this is normal and has always been the case). If you go through Reclaim Space, you get the choice of what existing partitions to delete or resize. ===================================================================== Mail 2 from Chris Murphy: Yeah, the user actually needs to go to some extreme lengths to erase all data on the selected disk. In Custom, it's deleted one partition at a time, with an optional shortcut that popsup offering to delete all related partitions (which still may not be all data on disk). Further, a summary pops up and shows what will be deleted in red text. In Guided, user either must set each partition to be deleted, or click on the disk (make model number) and set it to delete which then shows all partitions being set to delete as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 995886] New: kickstart "repo" suboptions incomplete
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995886 Bug ID: 995886 Summary: kickstart "repo" suboptions incomplete Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: stephent98(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Description of problem: For the kickstart "repo" option, the F19 Installation Guide lists three suboptions: repo --name=<repoid> [--baseurl=<url>| --mirrorlist=<url>] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ki… The Anaconda/Kickstart wiki lists nine suboptions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo repo --name=<name> [--baseurl=<url>|--mirrorlist=<url>] [options] --name= --baseurl= --mirrorlist= --cost= --excludepkgs= --includepkgs= --proxy=[protocol://][username[:password]@]host[:port] --ignoregroups=true --noverifyssl Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 Installation Guide http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ki… Anaconda/Kickstart wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo Additional info: Bug 995526 - regression: --cost ignored in kickstart file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa April 2014