[Bug 967695] New: Upload Firewalld.po to Transifex
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967695
Bug ID: 967695
Summary: Upload Firewalld.po to Transifex
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tomo(a)dream.daynight.jp
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com,
security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Firewalld.po is not uploaded to Transifex.
So, 3.9 Firewalld is not translated into any language.
Please upload Firewalld.po, not Firewall.po.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19 trunk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 902130] Boost is not a collection of C libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902130
Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Flags|needinfo?(docs-qa(a)lists.fed |
|oraproject.org) |
Last Closed| |2013-05-25 02:14:50
--- Comment #2 from Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> ---
Cleaning up some stale docs bugs today. The change was quick, we probably don't
need a rigorous QA on this one. Thanks again for reporting, Jonathan.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 962869] New: Some Textual improvements and a typographical correction
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962869
Bug ID: 962869
Summary: Some Textual improvements and a typographical
correction
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Category: ---
Created attachment 747746
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=747746&action=edit
ODT format markup of the first page of the release notes.
Provide details here. Do not change the blocking bug.
First page of the F19 release notes.
I have a markup document.
I rephrased some text and corrected errors.
I can do before/after here, so please advise how better to proceed.
Before
You can help the Fedora Project community continue to improve Fedora if you
file bug reports and enhancement requests. Refer to Bugs And Feature Requests,
on the Fedora wiki, for more information about bug and feature reporting. Thank
you for your participation.
After
You can help the Fedora Project community continue to improve Fedora by filing
bug reports and enhancement requests. Refer to Bugs And Feature Requests, on
the Fedora wiki, for more information about bug and feature reporting. Thank
you for your participation.
Please review the attachment. Yellow hightlighted text means no change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 964455] New: Node.js really shouldn't be in the "Java Development" section of the release notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964455
Bug ID: 964455
Summary: Node.js really shouldn't be in the "Java Development"
section of the release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Category: ---
Node.js is currently listed in the "Java Development" section of the release
notes, but JavaScript really has nothing to do with Java. (You can thank
Netscape's marketing department from the 90s for this wonderful confusion.)
Please consider moving it somewhere else. Perhaps adding a new "Web
Development" section is in order? I'm sure I can find a few more things to add
to such a section. ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 959636] New: Transifex expression check problem
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959636
Bug ID: 959636
Summary: Transifex expression check problem
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tomo(a)dream.daynight.jp
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com,
security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com
Category: ---
Description of problem:
I encountered error message saying
"The expression '% a' is not present in the translation."
while translating strings below[1] on transifex[2].
So, I couldn't save translation strings.
But, this string '% a' is not gettext expression.
If there is a blank characters following '%',
you should not check it, shouldn't you?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to Fedora Security Guide on Transifex.
2. Translate strings that contains character '%'.
e.g.
https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-security-guide/translate/#...
3. Click "Save".
Actual results:
"The expression '% a' is not present in the translation."
Expected results:
Save translated strings.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
[Bug 901704] New: Replace "Fedora" with "$PRODUCT"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901704
Bug ID: 901704
Summary: Replace "Fedora" with "$PRODUCT"
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: eric(a)christensenplace.us
Created attachment 682699
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=682699&action=edit
Patch to remove all "Fedora"
Description of problem: The Security Guide has a sprinkling of "Fedora" through
the guide. We want to try to make sure that the guides are easily changeable
to other products through the entity file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 18.0.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 12 months