[Bug 1036643] New: Example 3.1 appears to mix references to 32- and 64-bit install DVD isos
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036643
Bug ID: 1036643
Summary: Example 3.1 appears to mix references to 32- and
64-bit install DVD isos
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
In Example 3.1 in the current install guide, the mount command refers to a
64-bit version of the ISO, but the final call to "livecd-iso-to-disk" refers to
a 32-bit version of the ISO. Is this deliberate? It seems potentially
confusing.
rday
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 9 months
[Bug 982656] New: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation Complete
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982656
Bug ID: 982656
Summary: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation
Complete
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Keywords: Documentation
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pkovar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Hey Petr,
Just a couple of suggestions for section 9.17. Installation Complete
"Now that you have configured the remaining settings, your Fedora installation
is now complete!" --> "Now that you have configured the remaining settings,
your Fedora installation is complete."
"9.17.1. Initial Setup in GNOME" --> GNOME Initial Setup
"haven't" --> "have not"
"The Initial Setup application is only available for GNOME."
This might need some rewording since we now have two initial setup apps in
Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewFirstboot,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/InitialExperience) that do almost the
same thing, but target different DEs.
"create an user account" --> "create a user account"
"After you are finished configuring" --> "After you have finished configuring"
"On the first login, the Gnome Help application will automatically open"
The application is called Yelp, not Gnome Help. However, you probably just want
to mention that "GNOME Help will automatically open...".
"Figure 9.40. Language selection in Gnome Initial Setup" --> "Language
selection in GNOME Initial Setup"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 9 months
[Bug 904083] New: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904083
Bug ID: 904083
Summary: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not?
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: storage-administration-guide
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es
I've seen in http://docs.fedoraproject.org that last version of "Storage
Administration Guide" is for Fedora 14. It's more than two years ago!!
I don't know if this fact is due to this guide doesn't need any update or if
it's due to a lack of love from editors.
I want to notify this in Bugzilla to remember this situation, but I'm not sure
it is really a bug...
Could you tell me the reason of this abandonment?
Thanks!!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 1010674] New: kdeaccessibility
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010674
Bug ID: 1010674
Summary: kdeaccessibility
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: accessibility-guide
Assignee: gerard(a)ryan.lt
Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: gerard(a)ryan.lt, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Hi,
In transifex:
"In Fedora, <application>KMouseTool</application> is packaged in the
<package>kdeaccessibility</package> package. This package also contains
kmagnifier, kmouth, and ktts, all of which are discussed in other areas of this
guide. To install <package>kdeaccessibility</package> you can either select
<menuchoice><guilabel>System > Administration > Add/Remove
Software</guilabel></menuchoice> and then type in
<package>kdeaccessibility</package> in the screen that pops up, or in a
terminal window type su -c "yum install kdeaccessibility"."
I just searched and found kmousetool has been packaged as standalone package
from f20, should we revise the doc?
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 1050178] New: Fedora - Documentation website - Updated Czech translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050178
Bug ID: 1050178
Summary: Fedora - Documentation website - Updated Czech
translation
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: publishing-requests
Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Please publish an updated Czech translation of the Fedora Documentation Website
(docsite-publican).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Published version shows some typos and untranslated strings.
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 1043292] New: simple typos
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043292
Bug ID: 1043292
Summary: simple typos
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: readme-burning-isos
Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Few typos found in some of the guide chapters/files:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
1. File: Making_USB_Media
Line 281 (last para): Use this method for the distribution image, the
minimal boot media image, or on systems with a UNIX operating system (including
Mac OX X).
Incorrect name of the Apple operating system.
2. File: Making_Minimal_Boot_Media
Line 27 (5th para, 3rd item/indent of the list Use minimal boot media): to
use a kickstart file during installation (refer to <xref
linkend="s2-kickstart2-boot-media"/>
The ending round bracket/parenthesis is missing.
3. File: Procedure_dd_Image_to_USB
Line 22 (3rd para, preceding the output of dmesg command): ...The output
will identify the <systemitem>device node</systemitem> of the drive, in this
case <literal>/dev/sdc</literal>:
The actual output however contains sdd (inconsistency).
Expected results:
1. Should be Mac OS X
2. The ending round bracket/parenthesis should be added
3. The device name should be changed to /dev/sdd
Additional info:
Just noticed, while doing the translation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 982517] New: 4.4.1. Adding a New User
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982517
Bug ID: 982517
Summary: 4.4.1. Adding a New User
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In section 4.4.1 at item number 6 explaining the user creation process, it is
inferred that the contents of /etc/skel are as follows:
.
..
.bash_logout
.bash_profile
.bashrc
.gnome2
.mozilla
They are in fact:
.
..
.bash_logout
.bash_profile
.bashrc
.mozilla
.zshrc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 1023496] New: 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection - no IPsec tab found
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023496
Bug ID: 1023496
Summary: 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection - no IPsec tab
found
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bobgus(a)rcn.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Created attachment 816182
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=816182&action=edit
When I type system-config-network, this is what I see
Description of problem:
In section 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection
The first few steps don't seem to work:
1) In a command shell, type system-config-network to start the Network
Administration Tool.
2) On the IPsec tab, click New to start the IPsec configuration wizard.
I don't see any IPsec tab.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@hoho6 user1]# uname -a
Linux hoho6.chidig.com 3.11.6-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 18 22:34:18 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@hoho6 user1]#
I did a yum update a few minutes ago.
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open a terminal session, log in as root
2. type 'system-config-network'
3. look for IPsec tab.
Actual results:
Could not find IPsec tab
Expected results:
Found IPsec tab
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 891931] New: Chapter 3
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891931
Bug ID: 891931
Summary: Chapter 3
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: jwboyer(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I wrote this a couple of weeks ago:
http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46149.html
It details building a custom kernel. Feel free to use anything you'd like from
there. However, it doesn't cover:
- generating your own key/certs
- signing shim or grub2 (trivially derived from the existing kernel example)
- third party module signing
Peter is working on a tool to make generating certs that UEFI likes easier for
people. I was waiting for that tool to be available before really covering
those aspects, as that is what we want users to use.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months