[Bug 1095977] New: RFE: static IP assignment
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095977
Bug ID: 1095977
Summary: RFE: static IP assignment
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: cookbook
Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Static IP addresses are crucial for applications like DHCP servers or other
infrastructure that can't rely on external assignment. They're also helpful for
home users that want to predictably locate their Fedora installation.
Explain the use case for this and some alternative methods, then the procedure
for setting a setting a static IP using both ifcfg files and graphical methods.
Each method could be explained in a separate article; ie "... on the command
line" and "... with GNOME" and "... with KDE" and so on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1101798] New: RFE: Captive portal
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101798
Bug ID: 1101798
Summary: RFE: Captive portal
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: cookbook
Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Create a recipe for configuring a simple captive portal with Fedora that will
require users to acknowledge a terms of use message before allowing connections
to pass.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1101796] New: RFE: NAT router
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101796
Bug ID: 1101796
Summary: RFE: NAT router
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: cookbook
Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Create a recipe for using Fedora as a NAT router using Firewalld and
NetworkManager.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1096394] New: RFE: Thin Client (Tracking Bug)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096394
Bug ID: 1096394
Summary: RFE: Thin Client (Tracking Bug)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: cookbook
Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora can be used as a server and client environment for a thin client
deployment. Document the required procedures to do this.
Because of the broad scope and number of procedures involved, this should be
split up into recipes addressing component tasks. This bug will be used to
track the overall progress; please block this bug with any new bugs created for
the purpose.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1095945] New: RFE: disabling head parking on spinning drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095945
Bug ID: 1095945
Summary: RFE: disabling head parking on spinning drives
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: cookbook
Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Some drives have aggressive APM, and the resulting frequent head parking can
negatively impact access latency and produce an annoying clicking sound.
Explain the theory, benefits, procedure, and risks of adjusting APM settings
with hdparm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 982899] New: 7.3.1. Establishing a Wired (Ethernet) Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982899
Bug ID: 982899
Summary: 7.3.1. Establishing a Wired (Ethernet) Connection
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In section 7.3.1:
Default connection no longer called 'em1'
No field for 'connection name'
you can add new settings for the network under different profiles by selecting
'add profile...'
you can remove/reset a profile by going to the 'options' button under the
profile and selecting the 'reset' item on the left, and then choosing to either
'reset' or 'forget'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 9 months
[Bug 1001344] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001344
Bug ID: 1001344
Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
vgoyal(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998565
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot
Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This
feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines.
--- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT ---
I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not
sure how to do it.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT ---
(In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1)
> I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am
> not sure how to do it.
Vivek, create Package Review -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and
block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps.
Thank you.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 1001343] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001343
Bug ID: 1001343
Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
vgoyal(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998565
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot
Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This
feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines.
--- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT ---
I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not
sure how to do it.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT ---
(In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1)
> I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am
> not sure how to do it.
Vivek, create Package Review -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and
block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps.
Thank you.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 977042] New: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977042
Bug ID: 977042
Summary: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
The System Administrator's Guide references a number of GUI utilities, many of
which are specific to GNOME. It isn't immediately obvious to the uninitiated
that this is the case, causing non-GNOME users to find fault with the guide.
I suggest an admonition in the preface along the lines of "Some of the
graphical procedures and menu locations are specific to GNOME, but most command
line instructions will be universally applicable" Comprehensively
differentiating between GNOME procedures, procedures for other DEs, and
universal procedures would probably be prohibitively time consuming.
--Pete
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months