December 2015 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1217953] New: '--nombr' option from bootloader keyword in kickstart file is not documented

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217953 Bug ID: 1217953 Summary: '--nombr' option from bootloader keyword in kickstart file is not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: franta(a)hanzlici.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: 'ksverdiff -f F20 -t F21' command (among others) print: " The following options were added to the bootloader command in F21: --disabled --nombr " But F21 'Installation Guide' in "A.2.2. bootloader" chapter: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/sec... not mention '--nombr' option for this keyword. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F21 Installation Guide (above URL) ksverdiff from pykickstart-1.99.65-2.fc21.noarch Additional info: - for unknown reason, RH Bugzilla offers only 'devel' version for this issue, although I want report it again F21. - of course, there may be bug somewhere in 'ksverdiff'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 3 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1214964] New: Hold Option to select boot source on Mac hardware

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214964 Bug ID: 1214964 Summary: Hold Option to select boot source on Mac hardware Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: beland(a)alum.mit.edu QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co I'm not sure where to find the draft of the Fedora 22 Installation Guide, but I went through the Fedora 21 version steps in order to install the beta today. One suggestion for the new version of this page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/cha... I recommend adding something like "On Mac hardware, hold down Option to enter the boot media selection menu." Mac hardware with Intel chips is rather common now, so I hope a significant number of people would be aided by that addition. I spent several hours trying to figure that out the first time I put Fedora on a Macbook. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 3 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1280529] New: Document incorrectly suggests using FQDN in /etc/hostname

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280529 Bug ID: 1280529 Summary: Document incorrectly suggests using FQDN in /etc/hostname Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: networking-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: jkeating(a)j2solutions.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Networking_Guide/ch-C... This section of the documentation recommends using a FQDN for the static hostname, which is stored in /etc/hostname. However if one does that, uname -n (to find the node name) will always return the FQDN. This has impact on subsystems like python when determining the short name of the host. A better solution is to use the shortname in /etc/hostname and supply a FQDN in /etc/hosts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): devel (shown as 23) How reproducible: Very Steps to Reproduce: 1. Follow directions leading to FQDN in /etc/hostname 2. uname -n 3. hostname -s Actual results: FQDN shown as nodename, which does not match hostname -s Expected results: uname -n and hostname -s would both report the same short name, as defined in /etc/hostname Additional info: The RHEL7 documentation also suffers from this defect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1294989] New: [f23] Index section is empty, remove it?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294989 Bug ID: 1294989 Summary: [f23] Index section is empty, remove it? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: alan.christopher.jenkins(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Installation_Guide/ix... The Index contains a single entry (Feedback). It seems like the Index needs to be removed, maybe it was accidentally created by some annotation made on the Feedback section. (I looked at Index because there wasn't an obvious search function). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (454 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1294225] New: Search engines prefer old releases in docs.fedoraproject.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294225 Bug ID: 1294225 Summary: Search engines prefer old releases in docs.fedoraproject.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: federicoleva(a)tiscali.it QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Whenever I search Fedora documentation in search engines without setting a date interval, I end up in docs for fedora 14 or similar. There should be a way to make search engines prefer the most current version of each documentation page. It may be appropriate to add <link rel="canonical" from all pages to the most recent version of the same page, if existing; or there could be a directory //docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/latest/ or similar, which would be symlinked to 23/ or whatever is the latest version and would be the target of all links. More on rel canonical: * https://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-wit... * https://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2014/02/faceted-navigation-be... Related issues: bug 1284490, bug 1225537, bug 948823, bug 1115469. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (447 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1281564] New: Link to Common F23 Bugs in Fedora 23 Release Notes is wrong

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281564 Bug ID: 1281564 Summary: Link to Common F23 Bugs in Fedora 23 Release Notes is wrong Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/sect-Re... the link to "Common F23 Bugs" is wrong. It's value is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F_bugs but should be https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1292310] New: fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7, has unnecessary escapes, and will not parse correctly (in some cases)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292310 Bug ID: 1292310 Summary: fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7, has unnecessary escapes, and will not parse correctly (in some cases) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: PTrenholme(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: When parsed by KConfigIni, these errors appear: "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\\"\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\$\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\\"\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\$\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\$\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\$\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\$\"." "KConfigIni: In file /usr/share/applications/fedora-release-notes.webapp.desktop, line 7: " "Invalid escape sequence \"\\$\"." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): latest rawhide How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: run any KDE app (in GNOME or elsewhere) Actual results: See description Expected results: Epiphany display Additional info: The installed .desktop file works fine in GNOME, but causes errors when any KDE application that causes KConfigIni to run is started from a terminal in GNOME This line 7 works fine in GNOME, and, when parsed by KConfigIni, no errors are produced. Exec=sh -c "PROFILEDIR=$HOME/.config/epiphany/fedora-release-notes;DOC=/usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes/index.html; [ -d $PROFILEDIR ] || mkdir -p $PROFILEDIR;epiphany --application-mode --profile=$PROFILEDIR $DOC || xdg-open $DOC " (Note also the added "-p" option to the mkdir command. I seldom use epiphany, so I had no "epiphany" sub-dir in /.config. Adding the -p made it work.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (440 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2015