May 2015 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (237 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1222303] New: Release notes on the TC4 beta iso differs from the website release notes

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222303 Bug ID: 1222303 Summary: Release notes on the TC4 beta iso differs from the website release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: medium Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 1026450 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1026450&action=edit Release Notes Edit example -- grade 5 versus high-school english Description of problem: The embedded release notes /usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes differs from the release notes posted on the website In addition the /usr/share/release notes refers to Fedora 19 in some links. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 22 Beta TC4 due to be released 26 May How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Good grammar and good release notes. The release notes should be on the wiki, where many eyes can see and improve them. Additional info: Justification for wiki Refer to attached two example of documentation (before editing and after editing) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 11 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (230 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1222337] New: kickstart options have no %addon paragraph

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222337 Bug ID: 1222337 Summary: kickstart options have no %addon paragraph Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: liebundartig(a)freenet.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co I am sorry, if this is the wrong component. Feel free to change accordingly. Description of problem: The new home of the kickstart options for Fedora: https://github.com/rhinstaller/pykickstart/blob/master/docs/kickstart-doc... is missing the paragraph for '%addon' The paragraph is present at: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (223 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1218853] New: Typo in Fedora 22 KDE Beta release notes

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218853 Bug ID: 1218853 Summary: Typo in Fedora 22 KDE Beta release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ch.pkts.ca QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The release notes on the Fedora 22 KDE Beta refers to itself as Fedora 19. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 22 Beta How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. file:///usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_22.html#sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora 2. Look at section 1.3.2 3. See "Graphical installation of Fedora 19 requires"... Actual results: It says Fedora 19 Expected results: It should say Fedora 22 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

9 years

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1197237] New: mancata conferma cambio password utente

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197237 Bug ID: 1197237 Summary: mancata conferma cambio password utente Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Severity: low Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: bagigis(a)tiscali.it QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 996206 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=996206&action=edit allegato Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

9 years

1
1
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (216 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

9 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1217734] New: Insecure network installation instructions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217734 Bug ID: 1217734 Summary: Insecure network installation instructions Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)lemmin.gs QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The install guide specifies to download the kernel/initrd for PXE boots over an unencrypted connection and skips any form of verification. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): N/A How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Follow instructions: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/px... (note the wget URLs) Actual results: If just a single network between my machine being booted and the Red Hat download server is malicious, then my machine could get 0wned :( (and I would probably be none the wiser) Expected results: To be able to securely install an operating system in 2015 on my new hard drive in a single evening without crying in despair. And to not have a deep dark fear that the instructions on the previous page are also horribly insecure: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/px... (I really hope those stage2 and root lines verify the image that is downloaded) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

9 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa May 2015