June 2016 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 997219] New: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219 Bug ID: 997219 Summary: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Assignee: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Reporter: sirjake(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Guide says that you can right click on a ISO image and choose "Write to disc." This is not true, at least with Fedora 19. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 19 How reproducible: Always, at least in 32 bit. Steps to Reproduce: 1. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Burning_ISO_images_to_... 2. Insert a DVD. 3. Attempt to follow the directions above. No "Write to disk" option exists. Actual results: No obvious way to burn ISO images in Fedora Linux 19. Expected results: Directions to burn ISO disk in Fedora Linux 19 Additional info: I had a new-to-me computer that I assumed would not support 64 bit, but after installing 32 bit found out that 64 was supported by my processor. I downloaded 64 ( Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-1.iso ), and wanted to burn a disk of it, but the option was not available and the directions online did not help. I had to go back to Windows on a different machine to burn it. Note: I do have a DVD burner on this machine. The same thing occurs with CD's in the burner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1336138] New: System Administrator guide: Documentation of grubby commands must be run as root

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336138 Bug ID: 1336138 Summary: System Administrator guide: Documentation of grubby commands must be run as root Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: fh.fedora(a)fhenry.fr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In chapter: 21.4. Configuring GRUB 2 Using the grubby Tool The following commands should be mentioned to be executed also as root, like the other ones, using a sharp caracter at begining of each command; ~]$ grubby --info=ALL ~]$ grubby --info /boot/vmlinuz-4.2.0-1.fc23.x86_64 grubby --remove-args="argX argY" --args="argA argB" --update-kernel /boot/kernel ~]$ grubby --info /boot/vmlinuz-4.2.0-1.fc23.x86_64 Otherwise, this error is displayed in the console: Unable to access bootloader configuration file "/etc/grub2-efi.cfg": Permission denied Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 23 - System Administrator Guide How reproducible: Run command 'grubby --info /boot/vmlinuz-X.Y.Z-r.fc23.x86_64' as user Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Error: Unable to access bootloader configuration file "/etc/grub2-efi.cfg": Permission denied Expected results: Command is executed without error Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1343775] New: Guide for Fedora 23 still has "DRAFT" watermark

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343775 Bug ID: 1343775 Summary: Guide for Fedora 23 still has "DRAFT" watermark Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: jon(a)endpoint.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1165767 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1165767&action=edit simple patch to remove draft status The web documentation here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/System_Administrators... still has a big "DRAFT" watermark. But Fedora 24 is coming out soon. If the Fedora 23 docs aren't past draft stage now, they never will be. :) Maybe there's some official process for promoting a document beyond the draft stage, but if so, I'm not sure what the point is if it never happens before a new Fedora release comes out. Attached is a patch to change that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (636 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

7 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (629 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

7 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Predator drone adaptation of coding

by GARY SKEETE

Surveillance of Lone wolfs and other terror suspects The juxtaposition of frequencies projected to within the brain to be adjusted to the brains frequency of 40 Hz be adaptation of visuals within the brain visual cortex centre the adaptation of qubit strategically placed to allow for the magnification and visualization of brainwaves frequencies speech thought word and deed cognition memory brief response reflex action as well as emotional content be adaptation of split second decision making of change of mind of spur of the moment thinking the realization that within these patterns like a distinct method of contributing to actions which are not covered by Internet coverage but are equally covered by this type of noninvasive surveillanc

7 years, 10 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (622 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

7 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 948823] New: Need a search solution for docs.fedoraproject.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948823 Bug ID: 948823 Summary: Need a search solution for docs.fedoraproject.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: project-tracking Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Category: --- Description of problem: Due to the removal of Google search feature (see bug 616876) we no longer have a search solution for docs.fp.o. We need to investigate an alternate solution and bring the search feature back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 1220066] New: grub2-install suggestion doesn't distinguish between BIOS and UEFI installs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220066 Bug ID: 1220066 Summary: grub2-install suggestion doesn't distinguish between BIOS and UEFI installs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com ttps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/System_Administrators_... Section 20.4 and 20.4.1 apply only to BIOS computers, not UEFI. On UEFI: 1. grub2-install fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101352 2. If grub2-efi-modules is installed, grub2-install succeeds but then: 2a. This will break UEFI Secure Boot systems because the core.img/grubx64.efi binary that gets created isn't signed and therefore UEFI Secure Boot will reject it. 2b. On UEFI systems without Secure Boot, GRUB behavior is different in a number of ways including that it will no longer look to /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg but rather to /boot/grub2/grub.cfg. Two ways to fix the documentation: a.) A side bar that says this section doesn't apply to systems with UEFI firmware (maybe a link to where we give them a hint "how to find out what kind of firmware you have"), and/or that this section is effectively done by 20.4.2 step 3. b.) Reorganize 20.4 into discreet BIOS and UEFI sections. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 1344491] New: Add whatcanidoforfedora in welcome.xml file

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344491 Bug ID: 1344491 Summary: Add whatcanidoforfedora in welcome.xml file Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jb.holcroft(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Can you please add a description and a link to http://whatcanidoforfedora.org/ in https://pagure.io/release-notes/blob/f24/f/en-US/Welcome.xml ? It's complementary to Join wiki page -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa June 2016