February 2017 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1017792] New: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017792 Bug ID: 1017792 Summary: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In the "Verifying the %files section" chapter of the RPM guide [1], there is written "symlink", but it seems RPM uses "link" instead. Also I had trouble with the "maj" and "min", I guess there is "rdev" used instead. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. See the "Verifying the %files section" chapter Actual results: There are symlink, maj and min Expected results: The link and probably rdev Additional info: [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/R... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1003962] New: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003962 Bug ID: 1003962 Summary: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: daniel.neuberger(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The fedora RPM guide does not document the -p option that can be passed to the RPM scriptlets. It should probably be located here http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/R..., but I looked through the entire guide and couldn't find it. The only only place I could find it documented is here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets, but what it says is wrong. It says: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which allows the scriptlet to invoke a single program directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs. (ie: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig)" A more accurate description is: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which specifies the interPreter that should be used to run the script (the default is /bin/sh). Sometimes the -p option is used with no body in order to run a single command directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs (i.e. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig). Note that this form requires that there be nothing but white space (not even comments) until the next section begins." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
7
0 / 0

[Bug 1057882] New: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057882 Bug ID: 1057882 Summary: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an updated Czech version of the F20 Installation Quick Start Guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Mostly grammar errors found in current version. Expected results: An updated Czech translation published - missing translation(s) added, translation revision and precision. Additional info: If the bug BZ#1056196 is a serious obstacle, publish this update once the bug is resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1050903] New: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050903 Bug ID: 1050903 Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an update of the Czech translation of Burning ISO images to disc guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Translation update - missing translation, revision and precision. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1365347] New: Please Publish edits made to virt-getting-started and Release notes

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365347 Bug ID: 1365347 Summary: Please Publish edits made to virt-getting-started and Release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: grundblom(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Hello, I have made corrections to the release notes, and I would like to request to have them published to the website (docs.fedoraproject.org). Also, I would like to request that the Virtualization Getting Started Guide become available on the website (docs.fedoraproject.org) The Virtualization Getting Started Guide has been migrated to: https://pagure.io/virt-getting-started-guide Let me know if you need more information or I have missed a step in this process to get these published. Thank you very much! -Glen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1276867] New: Packaging:SourceURL#Git Tags is erroneous for GitHub repository

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276867 Bug ID: 1276867 Summary: Packaging:SourceURL#Git Tags is erroneous for GitHub repository Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: high Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: francis.andre.kampbell(a)orange.fr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Hi The documentation about specifying SourceURL at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL, chapter Git Tags is erroneous setup should be %prep %setup -qn %{name}-%{gittag0} [GitHub] instead of %prep %setup -qn %{name}-%{version} [GitHub] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 985020] New: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985020 Bug ID: 985020 Summary: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: bvoperdf21(a)mt2014.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Description of problem: First I'd like to thank for the awesome documentaions available. Also +1 for the export function (PDF,html-single,...). Looking at the packagers guide I missed some information. It would be nice if you also tell what kind of rpm packages are out there. What I found so far: .rpm .src.rpm .debugsource.... .debuginfo.... For example I still don't know if the debugsource is needed when using gdb for debugging or if the debuginfo package is enough. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Edition 18.0.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/P... 2.read everything Actual results: no description of the defferent types of rpm packages Expected results: find description of the defferent types of rpm packages and what they are used for/by. Additional info: would be nice to have this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 959626] New: config_name mismatch in mock example

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959626 Bug ID: 959626 Summary: config_name mismatch in mock example Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: axilleas(a)archlinux.gr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fnadge(a)redhat.com Category: --- Description of problem: In section 2.4.3. Testing a Package with Mock, the last example uses the epel-6-x86_64 config whereas Fedora 18 is referenced above. According to the preamble, the example should read: mock -r fedora-18-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eject-2.1.5-0.1.fc18.src.rpm Link: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1246286] New: Outdated websites in "Further information"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246286 Bug ID: 1246286 Summary: Outdated websites in "Further information" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: selinux-user-guide Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Reporter: ah(a)riseup.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mprpic(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: http://selinuxnews.org seems hopelessly outdated. Last post is from 2012. The documentations on the NSA page are all from 2007 or older. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 22, Edition 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1323502] New: Push fr "release-notes" and "welcome page" for f23

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323502 Bug ID: 1323502 Summary: Push fr "release-notes" and "welcome page" for f23 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jb.holcroft(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Hi there, Can you please push french release-notes for f23 and welcome page please ? I tried by email then ticket, but it looks like I took the wrong group. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/382#comment:1 Thanks for your help -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

2
6
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa February 2017