On Sat, 2018-04-28 at 08:45 +0000, Bill Chatfield wrote:
> mod_jk is easy to build from source. I just did it
> myself. The instructions are easy to understand, there are only a few
> steps, and it actually compiles without errors. You're not going to
> waste most of a day getting it to build. It takes about 15 minutes at
> the most. It has some significant advantages over mod_proxy in that
> it has better load balancing and fail-over.
But now we have mod_proxy_ajp, with support to load balancing and ajp
things, I'm using it now and it is even more easy to configure . And I
don't need to build any package .
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, April 22, 2018, 3:51:00 PM EDT,
> Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2018-04-22 at 09:46 -0500, Rex Dieter
> wrote:
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > > To simplify my concerns, what is easy way to install mod_jk ? on
> > > epel 7and
> > > 6 BTW
> >
> > I went through similar searching for my @dayjob awhile back, ended
> > up
> > switching to use apache's mod_proxy
>
> ah mod_proxy_ajp.so is available on httpd package of el6, el7 and
> Fedora
>
> Thanks for the tips
>
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> _______________________________________________
> java-devel mailing list -- java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.
> org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> java-devel mailing list -- java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.
> org
--
Sérgio M. B.