On Wednesday, July 21, 2010 08:39:56 am Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 10:49 AM, Mark Chappell wrote:
> > perl-Email-Date-Format,
>
> mark as dead
>
> > cairomm and wordnet appear to be in all arches
> > for beta 2 and should probably be removed from EPEL-6
> >
> >
> > perl-HTML-Format,
>
> 2.04-11.1.el6, 2.04-13
>
> > perl-Class-Data-Inheritable,
>
> 0.08-3.1.el6, 0.08-5
>
> > perl-Class-Trigger,
>
> 0.13-2.1.el6, 0.14-2
>
> > perl-Font-AFM,
>
> 1.20-3.1.el6, 1.20-5
>
> > perl-PadWalker,
>
> 1.9-1.el6, 1.9-1
>
> > perl-File-Copy-Recursive
>
> 0.38-4.el6, 0.38-1
>
> > and libart_lgpl
> >
> > appear to be newer versions in EPEL than in RHEL-6 beta 2, please could
> > you rebuild using the SRPMs available from the RedHat repositories
> > available at
ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Server
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark
>
> IMHO only perl-Class-Trigger has different version, but EL-5 < RHEL-6
> and RHEL-6 < EL-6.
>
> Could you point me to some guidelines about NVRs in EPEL? I suppose
> there is no rule, which say that RHEL-6.0 must have bigger NVRs than
> EL-6.
There is no supported upgrade path i know of from rhel5 to rhel6 without
reinstalling. If Red Hat ships a version in optional on one arch thats less
than the el-5 version we still must use the rhel5 version for the other
arches