fuse-sshfs performance is poor? It can only reach 10M/s over the gigabits-ethernet. On the both endpoint, ssh and sshd processes take the CPU usage less than 20% with a single core of Inteal-E5520. It seems the speed should be at least 40M/s.
]# dd if=olddata/diskdata count=100000 bs=64k skip=8000 | md5sum 316211200 bytes (316 MB) copied, 32.2354 seconds, 9.8 MB/s
]# dd if=olddata/diskdata count=100000 bs=4k skip=8000 | md5sum 28954624 bytes (29 MB) copied, 3.80448 seconds, 7.6 MB/s
]# dd if=olddata/diskdata count=100000 bs=512k skip=8000 | md5sum 30408704 bytes (30 MB) copied, 4.33369 seconds, 7.0 MB/s
Regards, Kirby Zhou from SOHU-RD +86-10-6277-8261
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Kirby Zhou kirbyzhou@sohu-rd.com wrote:
fuse-sshfs performance is poor? It can only reach 10M/s over the gigabits-ethernet. On the both endpoint, ssh and sshd processes take the CPU usage less than 20% with a single core of Inteal-E5520. It seems the speed should be at least 40M/s.
]# dd if=olddata/diskdata count=100000 bs=64k skip=8000 | md5sum 316211200 bytes (316 MB) copied, 32.2354 seconds, 9.8 MB/s
]# dd if=olddata/diskdata count=100000 bs=4k skip=8000 | md5sum 28954624 bytes (29 MB) copied, 3.80448 seconds, 7.6 MB/s
]# dd if=olddata/diskdata count=100000 bs=512k skip=8000 | md5sum 30408704 bytes (30 MB) copied, 4.33369 seconds, 7.0 MB/s
It can depend on multiple things like encryption, network latency, latency of the fuse system itself. You would need to test with say arcfour as the encryption method or use a method that has no encryption to see what the base speed would be.
Regards, Kirby Zhou from SOHU-RD +86-10-6277-8261
epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kirby Zhou -
Stephen John Smoogen