I agree with Jeff.
It looks good, go for it.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:49 AM Jeff Sheltren <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com> wrote:
Hi Jos, seems fine to me; I'd say go for it!
-Jeff
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:58 PM Jos de Kloe <josdekloe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I received a user request to update eccodes, see:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850633
>
> Currently EPEL7 and EPEL8 have version 2.14 that was published by
> upstream last October.
> The latest upstream version is 2.18 and is, as far as I can tell fully
> backwards compatible with 2.14.
> However, it does contain a number of bug-fixes and additions.
>
> When I look at the update pol;icy:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Some_examples_o...
> then my guess would be that it is okay to perform this update, since the
> update is in my eyes minor.
> The update policy on this page mentions ABI compatibility but does not
> mention what to do if an ABI change is backward compatible.
>
> So since knowing is better than guessing, before putting effort in to
> this, I would like to ask on this mailing list if my interpretation is
> correct.
>
> Jos de Kloe.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproj...